Demo version of Tube Sites Submitter is ready!

[elmy]

Dear users,

Would like to try how easily it is possible to work with Tube Sites Submitter?
We have created a DEMO version for you. Just click on: https://secure.tubesitessubmitter.com/demo.php and you can try Tube Sites Submitter right now.

Do you know that the database of Tube Sites Submitter contains over 200 tube sites to which you can upload your videos? Check out the list of tubes on our blog: http://www.tubesitessubmitter.com/bl...be-sites-list/

Also we would like to thank to the users of Tube Sites Submitter and we are happy about your positive results. Also we thank for the comments and future suggestions.

[tranza]

Double post...

[tranza]

I've read some people saying that such submitter relies on watermark traffic exclusively, and that you can even get your videos listed but no traffic at all.

Is that true?

Have you guys tested it before making it live? If so, how many clicks can one expect to the affiliate link per video submission using this tool?

[margarita]

Is there any problem with watermark? It's not that hard to put some into video.

[u-Bob]

strange decision to make the tutorial vids available in .exe form instead of embedding them. </2 cents>

[tranza]

Is there any problem with watermark? It's not that hard to put some into video.

If you are an affiliate, most of the videos you get will already have a watermark.

If you add a second watermark, to a domain of yours, you can even get some type-in traffic, but it won't be much.

[Paul Markham]

Just what the business needs. Another automated way to add more free content to the existing mountains of free porn. How did we manage without it?

[margarita]

If you are an affiliate, most of the videos you get will already have a watermark.

If you add a second watermark, to a domain of yours, you can even get some type-in traffic, but it won't be much.

I'm new to this, but I've replaced sponsor's watermark with mine (with prior sponsor's permission). I don't see reason why anybody would have problem with this if you are promoting video owner's sites and you are not submitting full videos. But it's too soon for me to evaluate effectivity of this.

PS spam me with CCB sponsors offering 3-5 min clips with possibility to insert my own watermark

[margarita]

Just what the business needs. Another automated way to add more free content to the existing mountains of free porn. How did we manage without it?

I doubt anybody will buy it to post full length videos to give them for free

[tranza]

I'm new to this, but I've replaced sponsor's watermark with mine (with prior sponsor's permission). I don't see reason why anybody would have problem with this if you are promoting video owner's sites and you are not submitting full videos. But it's too soon for me to evaluate effectivity of this.

PS spam me with CCB sponsors offering 3-5 min clips with possibility to insert my own watermark

How many users actually take the time to type in what they see on the watermark after watching the video??

You'll be lucky to get 1 single click each 100,000 video views.

That's the issue.

[Axeman]

I bought it for a month to try it out. I submitted 2 videos just to see how it would do for tubes actually using the sponsor link etc. Only one site hard sex tube sent any traffic at all via the sponsor link. And that was 31 total hits for the month so far. So yes, I would say this is relying heavily on watermarks and the hope people actually type it in, which I would imagine would be a very low ratio of views to type ins.

Also the tube submitter really requires a fast upload speed to make it remotely functional. Was impractical on my 1 up. So needless to say I canceled my subscription for the site.

Programs owners looking to get their brand out there and with a quick uplink may find value is mass uploading with the product though.

[john FVC]

Sounds like an utter waste of time..

[tranza]

I bought it for a month to try it out. I submitted 2 videos just to see how it would do for tubes actually using the sponsor link etc. Only one site hard sex tube sent any traffic at all via the sponsor link. And that was 31 total hits for the month so far. So yes, I would say this is relying heavily on watermarks and the hope people actually type it in, which I would imagine would be a very low ratio of views to type ins.

Also the tube submitter really requires a fast upload speed to make it remotely functional. Was impractical on my 1 up. So needless to say I canceled my subscription for the site.

Programs owners looking to get their brand out there and with a quick uplink may find value is mass uploading with the product though.

Thanks for your feedback. That's exactly what I heard elsewhere. And I guess their lack of response to my question, proves that the results are not so great.

[Dwreck]

I just sighed up for it. I'm looking forward to getting this in place.

[tranza]

I just sighed up for it. I'm looking forward to getting this in place.

For you, as a program owner, it will probably do good.