GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Senate Repeals Don't Ask, Don't Tell (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1002478)

Agent 488 12-19-2010 08:37 PM

http://queermenow.net/blog/wp-conten.../gruntsxxx.jpg

The Demon 12-19-2010 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17785267)
I will enlighten you...among other problems it will cause...is a reduction in re-enlistments of current...would be career military...especially in Combat Arms...as the largest percentage of those that were/are opposed to the repeal of DADT were/are serving in Combat Arms. It will also affect the enlistment rate.

What the percentage of loss will be remains to be seen. I suspect somewhere around the 10% mark at a minimum.

There will be other problems...specifically for those gays that choose to enlist...ranging from the minor to the severe.

QFT...

Quote:

Maybe the military will start discharging "bigots" instead of "gays".
I enjoy reading left wing stupidity like this. If you don't support homosexuals, you MUST be a hater/bigot!

Redrob 12-19-2010 10:00 PM

I referenced "haters" and hating someone because of their biological characteristics has nothing to do with whether or not you support gays, women or minorities in the military.

The Demon 12-19-2010 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob (Post 17785359)
I referenced "haters" and hating someone because of their biological characteristics has nothing to do with whether or not you support gays, women or minorities in the military.

You'd first have to prove that homosexuality is a biological disorder to make this assertion.

TCLGirls 12-19-2010 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17784772)
She was on the flag ship of the Navy, USS Ronald Reagan, I guess you got the real consenus? What is your experience in the military,nothing, so you know nothing

In the United States, civilians control the military...say so in the US Constitution

TCLGirls 12-19-2010 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17785380)
You'd first have to prove that homosexuality is a biological disorder to make this assertion.

He didn't claim homosexuality is a biological disorder. He claimed it is a biological characteristic.

The Demon 12-19-2010 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17785389)
He didn't claim homosexuality is a biological disorder. He claimed it is a biological characteristic.

Semantics and a poor attempt to draw away from the discussion. He claimed it was "biological", he would have to prove that..

TCLGirls 12-19-2010 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17785472)
Semantics and a poor attempt to draw away from the discussion. He claimed it was "biological", he would have to prove that..

You have doubts that it is "biological" when a human becomes physically aroused by another same-sex human?

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 17785177)
how many of those 4000 are uncomfortable serving with black people?

Don't know, why does it matter?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17785383)
In the United States, civilians control the military...say so in the US Constitution

That's a stupid response

_Richard_ 12-20-2010 10:30 AM

when i was in cadets doing winter exercises, i don't recall ever even caring if anyone was gay as we piled on top of one another in the transport out, for the first chance at warmth in three days

i was happy i was warm

MaDalton 12-20-2010 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786215)
Don't know, why does it matter?

because you say with 1000 people not liking to serve along gay people something is bound to happen

so - do you think it's more or less than 25% who don't like to serve along black people? and how much does happen to black soldiers since we have like 60 or 70 years of experience on that?

or what about women? how high is the percentage of male soldiers who would prefer if women don't serve? or just be nurses like in the good old times?
in the german army women with arms are only allowed since maybe 8-10 years and still many male soldiers would prefer if they would not be allowed to.

so where do you draw the line? color? gender? sexual preferences? religion? IQ?

who's worthy to defend your country and worthy to have his human rights preserved?

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 17786359)
because you say with 1000 people not liking to serve along gay people something is bound to happen

so - do you think it's more or less than 25% who don't like to serve along black people? and how much does happen to black soldiers since we have like 60 or 70 years of experience on that?

or what about women? how high is the percentage of male soldiers who would prefer if women don't serve? or just be nurses like in the good old times?
in the german army women with arms are only allowed since maybe 8-10 years and still many male soldiers would prefer if they would not be allowed to.

so where do you draw the line? color? gender? sexual preferences? religion? IQ?

who's worthy to defend your country and worthy to have his human rights preserved?

Get your facts straight, Blacks served during the civil war, they did so openly.
http://sf.funcheap.com/wp-content/up...-Civil-war.jpg

Quit being an asshole and keep to the subject and stop looking so hard for a fight, thats why in it's self that there will be problems, people that don't like it will over think it

MaDalton 12-20-2010 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786398)
Get your facts straight, Blacks served during the civil war, they did so openly.
http://sf.funcheap.com/wp-content/up...-Civil-war.jpg

Quit being an asshole and keep to the subject and stop looking so hard for a fight, thats why in it's self that there will be problems, people that don't like it will over think it

i'm the asshole? funny.

ok, i'm not the expert on american history and at which point black people in the army weren't only cannon fodder but also allowed to become general etc., but if you still fail to see the similarity i am trying to point out, then i am officially giving up on you.

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 17786416)
i'm the asshole? funny.

ok, i'm not the expert on american history and at which point black people in the army weren't only cannon fodder but also allowed to become general etc., but if you still fail to see the similarity i am trying to point out, then i am officially giving up on you.

Your right, your not an expert so shut the fuck up

magicmike 12-20-2010 11:04 AM

I know a pilot that serves on the regan, i'll ask him about this concensus.

MetaMan 12-20-2010 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17785267)
I will enlighten you...among other problems it will cause...is a reduction in re-enlistments of current...would be career military...especially in Combat Arms...as the largest percentage of those that were/are opposed to the repeal of DADT were/are serving in Combat Arms. It will also affect the enlistment rate.

What the percentage of loss will be remains to be seen. I suspect somewhere around the 10% mark at a minimum.

There will be other problems...specifically for those gays that choose to enlist...ranging from the minor to the severe.

Ok so you have no proof. Congrats.

You would have to have your head in the sand for the past 30 years especially to not know there was gays in the military before enlisting. i mean common that is pretty much common knowledge.

so there is a difference between knowing and hearing? go to almost any high end store these days there will be a gay guy working. they are usually dressed in suites with dress shoes, you know business attire.

um and what do people expect gay guys prancing around in drag? i mean they have uniforms.

and soldiers arent allowed to have sexual contact with each other in the first place last time i read.

to "enlighten" me about something that has no factual backing is quite hilarious.

MaDalton 12-20-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786436)
Your right, your not an expert so shut the fuck up

dammit - i have this problem that everytime someone tells me to shut up i start posting twice as much... :(

The Demon 12-20-2010 11:39 AM

Gotta love metaman. Someone makes him look stupid yet again, and he comes back with "you have no proof".


Quote:

You have doubts that it is "biological" when a human becomes physically aroused by another same-sex human?
Kinda takes out the purpose of saying "I'm gay and I'm proud" right? Also if it was conclusively biological, that's another reason not to support same sex marriage, but I digress.

TCLGirls 12-20-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786215)
That's a stupid response


Stupid or not, it's true and in the US Constitution...in the US, civilians control the military. So one does not need to have served in the military in order to pass judgment on certain military practices.

DaddyHalbucks 12-20-2010 11:45 AM

Great, now we will have more soldiers like Bradley Manning.

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/th...in-uniform.jpg

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17786556)
Stupid or not, it's true and in the US Constitution...in the US, civilians control the military. So one does not need to have served in the military in order to pass judgment on certain military practices.

The president is the commander and chief of the military, you moron
so shut the fuck up on matters you have no fucking idea about.

Civilians can't even get on base without a reason, moron

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 17786542)
dammit - i have this problem that everytime someone tells me to shut up i start posting twice as much... :(

Go ahead, I mean what if a gay black woman with one leg wants to join up?

If she can do the job, go for it

TCLGirls 12-20-2010 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17786545)
Kinda takes out the purpose of saying "I'm gay and I'm proud" right? Also if it was conclusively biological, that's another reason not to support same sex marriage, but I digress.

Not following...could you explain further? How does homosexuality being a biological characteristic take away from the purpose of saying "I'm gay and I'm proud". Are you saying people should not be proud of their own unique biological characteristics?

Regarding gay marriage, that's off topic, but I will say I think the Government should get out of the business of marriage all together and leave it to private entities/organizations themselves to choose whether or not they want to marry gay couples.

TCLGirls 12-20-2010 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786565)
The president is the commander and chief of the military, you moron
so shut the fuck up on matters you have no fucking idea about.

Civilians can't even get on base without a reason, moron

Congress also has control of the military...last I heard all Congress members are civilians.

http://captionsearch.com/pix/thumb/nb0pw5n8yk-t.jpg

Bryan G 12-20-2010 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 17786562)
Great, now we will have more soldiers like Bradley Manning.

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/th...in-uniform.jpg

Jesus you really are an ignorant redneck asshole Aren?t you

The Demon 12-20-2010 12:12 PM

The typical stupid liberal response is always a combination of redneck/hillbilly.

Amputate Your Head 12-20-2010 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786565)

Civilians can't even get on base without a reason, moron

except on all the bases that are wide open, that you can drive right in.

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17786678)
except on all the bases that are wide open, that you can drive right in.

Last time I was on one, I had to show ID
And we were on a list

if they close a base, it's closed, civilians can demand all they want

Amputate Your Head 12-20-2010 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786714)
Last time I was on one, I had to show ID
And we were on a list

if they close a base, it's closed, civilians can demand all they want

isn't Ft. Jackson wide open?
isn't Ft. Riley wide open?

etc.

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TCLGirls (Post 17786583)
Congress also has control of the military...last I heard all Congress members are civilians.

And do you in all your wisdom think you're getting the same rights given to members on congress? What a fucking moron!

Even members of congress can't get at every piece of military secrets, only the president can

KillerK 12-20-2010 12:39 PM

The big issue with this passing, is ....

If you are married in the military you get $400 more pay than if you aren't. So the Gays will fight hard for this next.

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17786722)
isn't Ft. Jackson wide open?
isn't Ft. Riley wide open?

etc.

Ever been on a base that was closed, I have

Ever loaded a nuke on a section of base that if anyone unauthorized would have been shot trying to get to?

I have.

Amputate Your Head 12-20-2010 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786733)
Ever been on a base that was closed, I have

Ever loaded a nuke on a section of base that if anyone unauthorized would have been shot trying to get to?

I have.

yes, i have.

but that's not the point. You said "Civilians can't even get on base without a reason". You are wrong.

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 17786729)
The big issue with this passing, is ....

If you are married in the military you get $400 more pay than if you aren't. So the Gays will fight hard for this next.

Didn't think of that, I wonder how they will do that, I mean if the military accepts gay marriage, they are considered federal, state law I don't think would apply, but I could be wrong

Vendzilla 12-20-2010 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17786738)
yes, i have.

but that's not the point. You said "Civilians can't even get on base without a reason". You are wrong.

OK, my bad. Should have said what I know, on a ship

baddog 12-20-2010 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan G (Post 17786587)
Jesus you really are an ignorant redneck asshole Aren?t you

Are you suggesting he is not gay?

cwd 12-20-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 17783184)
By a vote of 65 to 31 this afternoon, the Senate voted to repeal the military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy.


Now, if they can get their shit together and pass the Zadroga Bill this lame duck session won't seem so lame.

good deal. And they should not be allowed to leave until they can get the Zagroda bill passed, which it should have been long ago.

baddog 12-20-2010 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwd (Post 17786807)
they should not be allowed to leave until they can get the Zagroda bill passed, which it should have been long ago.

:thumbsup

TCLGirls 12-20-2010 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17786726)
And do you in all your wisdom think you're getting the same rights given to members on congress? What a fucking moron!

Even members of congress can't get at every piece of military secrets, only the president can

Pro Tip: The President is also a civilian.

Thus, civilians (President and Congress) control the military, regardless of how much that fact annoys you.

Rochard 12-20-2010 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17784467)
No, it's the consensus of the ship she was on that gays serving openly would make people uncomfortable more than having women on the ship.
When kids join the military they are surrounded by women, they are not always surrounded by gays.
Remember that I'm for gays serving

But that's part of my point. Shortly before they allowed women to serve on US Navy ships, all the men sat around saying "this is going to be more uncomfortable than serving with blacks". Change is always difficult.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123