Jullian Assange: Don't Leak my adress

[Deputy Chief Command]

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange tried to hide his bail address from the public in an astonishing move for the man responsible for leaking thousands of diplomatic secrets.
Assange's lawyers argued that the location - a 10-bedroom stately home - should not be disclosed on grounds of privacy during yesterday's hearing at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court.
But the move was dismissed by District Judge Howard Riddle, who ruled not to reveal the address would conflict with Assange's commitment to open justice.
The judge insisted the address - Captain Vaughan Smith's Ellingham Hall on the Norfolk/Suffolk border - was read out in open court as usual

.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ss-secret.html


what ? ? !!! can you say hypocrite ??!

not only does he not want the Judge to follow STANDARD PROCEDURE , he wants the Judge to withold information he deems too sensitive

[96ukssob]

.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ss-secret.html


what ? ? !!! can you say hypocrite ??!

not only does he not want the Judge to follow STANDARD PROCEDURE , he wants the Judge to withold information he deems too sensitive

im with him on this. its not that he's fearing the feds or police to find him, its nut job people of society that could endanger his home and life

[_Richard_]

guess the Captain didn't deserve the courts respect, either.

[Tom_PM]

Sounds like a petty judge there with a spiteful snarky attitude, lol. An eye for an eye makes sense?

[seeandsee]

this looks like leak peaker!

[czarina]

I don't think it's hypocrisy. Him, as an individual has the right to privacy. Governments and corporations do not.

[Deputy Chief Command]

how is not hypocrisy ? he wants everything be open and stuff ,but when it comes to his own things he wants it all hidden . . .

and it is not like they usually dont disclose the bail adress, it is standard procedure to make it public knowledge when someone gets bail , the judge reads out the bail adress, this idiot wanted the rules bend for him , hiding his bail adress for the sake of "privacy" , come on thats a joke ! this guy is a fooooool..

[Sly]

im with him on this. its not that he's fearing the feds or police to find him, its nut job people of society that could endanger his home and life

What about the nut jobs of society, around the world, that could attack and endanger the lives of those mentioned in the cables and their families?

Sounds like the judge doesn't like him very much, LOL. His reaction is pretty funny.

[Sly]

I don't think it's hypocrisy. Him, as an individual has the right to privacy. Governments and corporations do not.

A lot of cables had personal opinions. What a diplomat thought of another, what a diplomat thought of a President, etc., etc. That's not exactly government or corporate conspiracy.

I personally think the address should remain private to protect him. That's how the judge should have ruled, despite what Julian does or doesn't believe in.

[baddog]

im with him on this.

Of course you are.

[Si]

Nevermind,

More publicity for an old tramp with a girls name.

[PR_Glen]

how is not hypocrisy ? he wants everything be open and stuff ,but when it comes to his own things he wants it all hidden . . .

and it is not like they usually dont disclose the bail adress, it is standard procedure to make it public knowledge when someone gets bail , the judge reads out the bail adress, this idiot wanted the rules bend for him , hiding his bail adress for the sake of "privacy" , come on thats a joke ! this guy is a fooooool..

because his address is not a government or a corporation keeping secrets from people living or investing in them... do you really need to be told how this isn't hypocrisy?

and when factors such as the defendants safety is relevant? then standard procedure obviously changes... this judge made a pretty irresponsible decision whether you believe in what Assange is doing or not..

[Deputy Chief Command]

because his address is not a government or a corporation keeping secrets from people living or investing in them... do you really need to be told how this isn't hypocrisy?

and when factors such as the defendants safety is relevant? then standard procedure obviously changes... this judge made a pretty irresponsible decision whether you believe in what Assange is doing or not..

whatever, you obviously are not a neutral observer like myself, and if it is really all about safety , then he should be a happy man now, spending some more time in jail ,safe a way from all the lunatics of this world

[marketsmart]

What about the nut jobs of society, around the world, that could attack and endanger the lives of those mentioned in the cables and their families?

Sounds like the judge doesn't like him very much, LOL. His reaction is pretty funny.

FACT: not one person has been injured or killed from the leaks....






.

[Chris]

lol who would of thought

the man who wants everything to be open and free doesnt want his personal info out

[IllTestYourGirls]

because his address is not a government or a corporation keeping secrets from people living or investing in them... do you really need to be told how this isn't hypocrisy?

and when factors such as the defendants safety is relevant? then standard procedure obviously changes... this judge made a pretty irresponsible decision whether you believe in what Assange is doing or not..

Agreed.

[Sly]

FACT: not one person has been injured or killed from the leaks....






.

Fact: It's barely been a month.

I don't think anything will happen to those people. I also don't think anything would have happened to Julian, private citizen wise... now a government assassination, that's a different story. But they will do what they want anyway.

Dude dug his own grave. This is what he wanted. He can't cry like a baby now. He could have just as easily distributed all of this information without claiming it, he claimed it, he wanted the attention. He got it.

[Barry-xlovecam]

poetic justice

[baddog]

goose = gander

[cherrylula]

Nice pad. It takes a lot of paypal donations to keep that place running!

(couldn't resist that one)

[u-Bob]

Nothing hypocritical about that... Exposing government cover ups isn't the same as saying you are against privacy.

[The Demon]

I don't think it's hypocrisy. Him, as an individual has the right to privacy. Governments and corporations do not.

I'm sorry, governments and corporations don't have a right to privacy? What country are you living in with that belief?

[The Demon]

Nothing hypocritical about that... Exposing government cover ups isn't the same as saying you are against privacy.

That's assuming that your sense of entitlement is warranted. Any reasonable person is supposed to expect corruption and cover ups from any form of government. I don't care that it's happening as long as me, my family, and my country are ok.

[u-Bob]

That's assuming that your sense of entitlement is warranted. Any reasonable person is supposed to expect corruption and cover ups from any form of government. I don't care that it's happening as long as me, my family, and my country are ok.

I know governments are corrupt... All governments are corrupt... The fact is that governments claim to be clean and this guy is exposing their hypocrisy... for him

[The Demon]

I know governments are corrupt... All governments are corrupt... The fact is that governments claim to be clean and this guy is exposing their hypocrisy... for him

Everybody knows the government isn't clean so what this guy did was out of his element. He shouldn't expect a right of privacy at this point, ESPECIALLY since governments are corrupt

[MaDalton]

.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ss-secret.html


what ? ? !!! can you say hypocrite ??!

not only does he not want the Judge to follow STANDARD PROCEDURE , he wants the Judge to withold information he deems too sensitive

as someone who has to fear for his life i am right with him

[pornguy]

A lot of cables had personal opinions. What a diplomat thought of another, what a diplomat thought of a President, etc., etc. That's not exactly government or corporate conspiracy.

I personally think the address should remain private to protect him. That's how the judge should have ruled, despite what Julian does or doesn't believe in.

When those opinions were put into writing in duecorse of his work then he no longer has those as private thoughts.

Its not like thus guy gave away the address of the Presidents Mothers house.

[DamianJ]

Fact: This is being reported by the Daily Mail. They just print lies. It's nickname is the Daily Heil.

"I call it a racist, sexist, slanderous, homophobic, unprofessional, sensationalist Hitler fanzine"

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...erm=daily+mail

[Davy]

Two guys in suits and sun glasses will be waiting for him when he gets back home.
Two to the head, my boy!

[marketsmart]

Two guys in suits and sun glasses will be waiting for him when he gets back home.
Two to the head, my boy!

i hope so...

i am dying to see what those encrypted files contain...

if assange stays alive for another year, you'll know there was something really sweet in those files....




.

[u-Bob]

Everybody knows the government isn't clean so what this guy did was out of his element. He shouldn't expect a right of privacy at this point, ESPECIALLY since governments are corrupt

He probably didn't expect anything...

[BIGTYMER]

Did you see the story about him on Nightline last night? I'm starting to change my mind about him. And not in the good way.

[SmokeyTheBear]

a few thoughts.

i don't think he directly posted anyones personal info/address/etc. His leaks are generally exposing what is already supposed to be transparent.

I wonder if he didn't ask on purpose knowing it would be denied to show the hypocracy of the government/courts in expecting him to be transparent while they are not.

[SmokeyTheBear]

this quote seems appropriate either way.

"I never trusted that guy, for all I know he had me set up and had my friend Angel Hernandez killed"