Courts dont just issue orders, they are asked to do so and they're supposed to have good reason to even ask. Isn't that right? SO how can we just blanket courts and call them the problem when a cop kills a dog in a citizens home, even if they have a warrant?

Are we REALLY saying that if a court issues the entry warrant that it's a GIVEN that all dogs will be killed?

Where the fuck is the country I was born in?

Those squads entering homes and raising hell often just for fun are a bunch of sick people that deliberately decide to be violent. Just sad.....

let us know when the true story comes out, not the criminal's version of events.

Which is fine in my opinion. They didn't find enough to hit me with any serious charges, simply personal use.

In my opinion they had no reason to be in my house in the first place but I am no lawyer so unsure how those situations work. They obviously had some sort of probable cause though since they were able to obtain a warrant.

Going to check your profile to see if your ICQ is in there, if not feel free to hit me up on mine - 310171594.

Thanks! :thumbsup

I can't watch.

:(

How awful! Those cops should lose their animals now since they don't care about dogs.

That's too fucked up..fuckin assholes

I am not going to defend the police.

But I will tell you this.

A friend of mine has been a cop for over 5 years. At first it was very exciting for him to serve and protect the people while getting paid to do it.

Within a year, his mind was changed a lot. He would call me once a day and tell me stories and situations that makes you question what is wrong with people's heads.

All cops are stressed out, depressed, under paid, and get treated like shit from the majority of the public. The exciting days for them are gone faster than a few paychecks.

The majority of the public that cops come in contact with daily are not just your average weed smoker or traffic speeder. These kind of people cops consider a vacation to deal with.

So why these things happen like shooting three dogs? As a cop working year after year dealing with 100 scumbags a day, you start to develop an instant accurate profile of most people you come in contact with. This profiling has common factors that all cops agree on. You need to have such skills or you will end up dead or mentally insane.

You have to take into account, there were more than one cop at the scene. Something happened that made the cops kill the puppies. What happened? No one knows for sure. But you can be confident if the cops did not have to shoot the puppies, they would not have done so. They were pushed to do it and there are at least a dozen scenarios I can think of which prompts cops to shoot a dog.

That puppy that was said "hiding under the table" could have been ready to attack the cops. Cops are not trained to combat animals, specially pit bulls.

No one needs what is effectively the world largest street gang. AKA the police

FUCK THE POLICE

You sound like a bigger dumbass than your prick over-wound cop friend.

Waiting for that cunt baddog to come in here and defend this one.

I guess you did not get the memo. These days it is pretty much SOP for SWAT to shoot the dogs when they raid a house like this. Especially pit bulls. It's disgusting. I keep hoping someone brings a civil suit against these pieces of shit.

Ok, I'm not sure how to go about this.


Let's see........

• AMP copy/pastes a story from infowars, infowars mind you.
• A story where anyone in their right mind would read it and say "Whaaaa?".
• A story that is so completely and utter absurd.
• And not only so absurd, but so absurd with ZERO proof or factual content.
• The "facts" it tries to put forth are a youtube video of some dogs, and then a youtube video of a blood spot.

Then from all of this. Here we are two pages later. Herds of people blindly jumping on the bandwagon. And I'm the ONLY person to question the legitimacy of it? Did you people arrive to the internet yesterday or something?

If you are questioning whether this occurred or not here is your proof:

http://www.wsaz.com/news/headlines/D...111571679.html

Still not enough information yet to make an informed decision. I like to think for myself. I don't jump to conclusions on things.

From the infered tone of your post it seems you have jumped to the conclusion that the entire story is a work of fiction.

you are not aware that the gfy answer to a few bad apples is to get rid of police entirely and let a society of a few 100 million do wtf ever they want?

Has anyone here actually suggested that? If so, they are an idiot.

My comments were directed at everyone in the thread, not the story. My only comment to the story was that it is absurd (doesn't matter if it's true or fake, it's still an absurd story).

edit: Oh, I also said it lacked facts. But it does lack facts.

the post potter was replying to.

it's a fucking dog, get over yourself. THEY ARE PETS. NOT HUMANS...

I know most dogs are probably smarter than you are, but ...

This has happened dozens of times, and if you were 1/4 as aware and intelligent as you believe yourself to be, you would already know that.

It is now SOP for cops to kill dogs on raids. And it's completely unnecessary and total bullshit.

Drug laws are bullshit :2 cents

Shoot a police dog and watch what happens.

Mute point I figure... there's more humans in the world than dogs, they're just humans.

Only difference really is that the average human makes more friends in a lifetime which means more peeps will miss it when it's gone.

poor puppies!!

Most likely their brutal aggrressions which may result of their working conditions

Sorry, but I had to laugh out loud.:1orglaugh

Most likely the cops were bored, just plain stupid or brutal fuckers.

Oh yeah! He was lying on his back in fear. That´s the well known position of puppies being ready to attack.

I have always admired the US for freedom. But I can´t believe what is going on at the moment.

Again, think for yourself. Why do you think it is SOP. Because of a reasonable precedence that has been set forth over years and thousands upon thousands of other raids. Or because police like to shoot dogs?

Did you see this video from earlier this year?

what makes y'all think this is sop? i've done some snooping around to verify it is and haven't found anything along those lines.

Because I have been told by police officers I know personally that if SWAT raids a place and there are noisy dogs they are as good as dead.

Yeah, that really sucks.

But since this was a reply to this post by me:

The point you were trying to make was..... ????? Police like to shoot dogs? There's only two points that could be made directly to my post. And that is, "yes, there has been precedence set in the past" or "yes, police like to shoot dogs".

Seriously this is so ridiculous. I say, "Why do you think it is SOP". And your response is another youtube video of a dog that got shot during a raid. I mean, WTF dude? Where the hell are you at?

most likely because the cops like to get their rocks off by shooting something they know they can easily get away with.

Fuck the police.

right.

and that's not sop. that's you saying what an idiot with a gun might say.

And I have zero doubt that YOU truly and wholeheartedly believe this to be reality.

Dont forget the Mayor who's house was used as a drug drop point and when he brought the package into his house, SWAT bashed in the door, killed their 2 dogs and made the Mayor lay there in his underpants surrounded by his dogs blood.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...073003299.html

There. I dug it up so no memory required.

It's a disgusting trend, like auto-tazering anyone you feel like (can I prove that? no)

And it always fascinates me how on the internet people seem to be pushed to take such extreme polarized opinions on things. Everything always has to be an illogical battle to make it black and white. There's never any logical middle ground.

And now for lolcats
http://icanhascheezburger.files.word...eg?w=498&h=476

there are several stories online like this. but i'm sure you know people have a tendency to go online to recant a shitty situation like this more often than those who go online to state their homes were invaded and the dogs were not shot by idiots with guns.

Yes I know human nature is to share bad stories and keep good ones secret and safe. But this was not a BS story, it was on national news media when it happened. It goes to the point that regardless of someone saying it's not SOP, they certainly kill dogs that are running to hide from them as well as pit bulls being sent to attack. Every dog is a threat when swat breaks in is the default setting. I dont have a problem believing that or being convinced that it needs to be the approach to a raid. It still sucks pretty bad because although pets are legally simple property, everyone knows they are more like family.