![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
bot
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 997
|
ICM Claims Dot-XXX Victory
http://business.avn.com/articles/ICM...ry-419245.html
First I thought that the meeting went against them, now seems that its closer to getting approved. You think that GAC will block it or not? Anyone knows what is/was the stand of GAC towards .xxx? |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: netherlands
Posts: 248
|
hope they block it
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,280
|
This letter from August of this year sent by GAC Chairman Heather Dryden to ICANN Board Chairman Peter Dengate-Thrush might give some indication of GAC's general disposition toward .XXX.
Note the bits about the need for "procedures to identify strings that could raise national, cultural, geographic, religious and/or linguistic sensitivities or objections" and that such procedures "should apply to all pending and future TLDs." This is far from establishing that the GAC is against the approval of .XXX, of course, but it doesn't take a lot of reading in between the lines to understand that .XXX could very well be something that could inspire some of the "sensitivities or objections" referenced in the letter.
__________________
Q. Boyer |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |