Donald Trump beat Fox News

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sly
    Let's do some business!
    • Sep 2004
    • 31380

    #1

    Donald Trump beat Fox News

    Stick to your guns and watch 'em beg for mercy!

    *

    According to two high-level Fox sources, Ailes?s diplomacy was the result of increasing concern inside Fox News that Trump could damage the network. Immediately following Thursday?s debate, Fox was deluged with pro-Trump emails. The chatter on Twitter was equally in Trump?s favor. ?In the beginning, virtually 100 percent of the emails were against Megyn Kelly,? one Fox source, who was briefed on the situation, told me. ?Roger was not happy. Most of the Fox viewers were taking Trump?s side.?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...ews/?tid=sm_fb
    Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

    Windows VPS now available
    Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
    Click here for more details.
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176

    #2

    Comment

    • mineistaken
      See signature :)
      • Apr 2007
      • 29656

      #3
      Kick Megan Kelly to mnbc

      Ps: this scandal is a bit overrated. Surely she may have gone after Trump a little bit harsher than others, but there were reasons as well, for example when he interrupted her during the question, she naturally got irritated etc.

      All in all it was not THAT bad. Trump was the top dog so he got a bit more.

      But it is good for him to taunt all that, so he would gain from being a "victim" of Fox.

      Comment

      • Joshua G
        dumb libs love censorship
        • Jul 2008
        • 8198

        #4
        im quite confused why fox news tossed such hardballs at the candidates. was fox trying to be fair & balanced? that would be a hoot.

        it would make sense had the debate been hosted by NBC. the questions sounded like they were written by hillary. so i understand why viewers were pissed. they want to be fed right wing tilted nonsense not left wing!

        big fumble by fox for the propaganda effort, & now trump has to endure reams of bullshit from the left over his blood comments, which would never have happened if fox stuck to the script.

        Comment

        • mineistaken
          See signature :)
          • Apr 2007
          • 29656

          #5
          Originally posted by Joshua G
          im quite confused why fox news tossed such hardballs at the candidates. was fox trying to be fair & balanced? that would be a hoot.
          They described those hard questions as weak sports, something that democrats would target etc.

          Comment

          • Joshua G
            dumb libs love censorship
            • Jul 2008
            • 8198

            #6
            Originally posted by mineistaken
            They described those hard questions as weak sports, something that democrats would target etc.
            so let the debates next year on CNN ask the left wing questions. there was nothing for fox to gain doing what they did. i do know megyn makes an effort to appear fair & balanced.

            maybe she should work elsewhere than a propaganda factory.

            Comment

            • dyna mo
              just a fucking jerk
              • Dec 2008
              • 68447

              #7
              Originally posted by Joshua G
              im quite confused why fox news tossed such hardballs at the candidates. was fox trying to be fair & balanced? that would be a hoot.

              it would make sense had the debate been hosted by NBC. the questions sounded like they were written by hillary. so i understand why viewers were pissed. they want to be fed right wing tilted nonsense not left wing!

              big fumble by fox for the propaganda effort, & now trump has to endure reams of bullshit from the left over his blood comments, which would never have happened if fox stuck to the script.

              FOX did stick to their script. Was reading an interview of chris wallace pre-debate. he's been working on the questions for 1 year + with the agenda being to completely disarm the candidates with questions that force them from their pre-conceived answers. it was always about gotcha questions.


              :::::::

              a presidential candidate debate should never be about the question askers. it's a debate between candidates, not between a candidate and some silly dingbat reporter.

              Comment

              • Joshua G
                dumb libs love censorship
                • Jul 2008
                • 8198

                #8
                Originally posted by dyna mo
                FOX did stick to their script. Was reading an interview of chris wallace pre-debate. he's been working on the questions for 1 year + with the agenda being to completely disarm the candidates with questions that force them from their pre-conceived answers. it was always about gotcha questions.


                :::::::

                a presidential candidate debate should never be about the question askers. it's a debate between candidates, not between a candidate and some silly dingbat reporter.
                well then their script was a retarded move. someone over at fox forgot what fox's mission statement was, & made it about themselves, the moderators. Who on the left will give the mods credit for what they did? nobody. just retarded.

                Comment

                • Rob
                  I'm a great bowler.
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 13310

                  #9
                  You'd still hit it.

                  Comment

                  • bronco67
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 29026

                    #10
                    Megyn Kelly reportedly received death threats from Donald Trump supporters

                    Not surprising.

                    Comment

                    Working...