Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
... what is their incentive to respond to someone who is not in a position to make realistic threats? of course they don't reply. there is no reason to.
if he called his bank and charged it back... its over. what do you mean "freeze that account"? its his bank that issues the chargeback... its their credit card. its their client. its 100% out of your control.
if the transaction was for traffic, then i don't think you are going to get it reversed. he can just say he did not get what he thought he was getting and thats the end of it. i seriously doubt he called his bank and said someone used his card without his authorization... he gave a reason why he did not want to pay. that puts the ball back in your court and basically, you stand little chance of changing it. you have to find out the reason for the chargeback. if he lied saying his card was stolen/used without his authorization... then i would say you have a chance. if he said he did not get what he thought he was buying (i forgot the terms and codes - its been a while) - then you can't argue something that abstract with a bank that has no real reason to take your side against their own client.
from what i have seen so far, i would say that the best advice for you is to just walk away and consider it a lesson learned.
|
On the authorization part, that is actually what it says not authorized. That it wasnt authorized. Fortunetly I have a printed out PO# and an invoice for the work order amount. I also have the reciept from where I bought the traffic for them. They wanted traffic so they dumped money in my account to purchase it from whatever sources I needed to. In all I spent about 1300.00 on traffic.
Well 3:15am here so im off for a nap. Thanks to all those that gave advice, and Ill check back on this in the AM.