Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Matt_WildCash
Well I agree no software is unhackable, the fact that NATS is encypted on the backend certainly stops complicated indepth shaving going on. I'd certainly trust a $35 PPS console free program on NATS far more than I would a $35 console free run on someones own custom backend thats for sure.
|
This has been pondered quite a few times on gfy and many a "indepth shave" can be done without detection.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Matt_WildCash
Personally I look for high quality sites when promoting other sites and low trial prices (cause that matters alot), and if they are on NATS then I trust them just that little bit more.
Matt
|
Personally for me i trust every sponsors tracking about the same ZERO , until given some reason otherwise..
You should trust your sponsor first , the software they use second
If you trust the sponsor , it wont matter who the software is made by..
kind of like guns, they are made with safety locks , to prevent accidents.. , now would you trust a retard with a loaded gun with a safety lock , or a gun expert with no safety lock
People should use NATS because of what it offers not what it prevents ( especially when its been proven it doesn't )