What do you think they will scare us with next...
Now that .xxx is pretty much over...
Collapse
X
-
Now that .xxx is pretty much over...
84Roaming Death Squads forcing anyone who distributes nude pictures to shovel their own grave and die.0%525% porn tax.0%11More .xxx0%32257 antics0%22"Voulentery labeling" (not a bad idea)0%4Utah Spam law0%1The Bush twins starting their own affiliate program0%6Visa shuts us down0%14Swarming Loucusts0%1People will stop masturbating.0%6Hitler II0%11Tags: None -
Aren't they rewriting 2257 to push through again?

EasyWebcamPro - FREE Script to Promote TopCams.com!
100 Profiles Loaded * Contact Us For Your FREE Copy *
ICQ: 328477888 - http://www.solidscripting.com - [email protected] -
yes....Originally posted by SolidScriptingAren't they rewriting 2257 to push through again?
Comment
-
Who cares.
The only time when people will stop fucking is when mankind dies off the planet. Till then it will always make money.

NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo!
| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily
| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 |ICQ: 78943384 |Comment
-
-
-
-
Little bit of makeup, we could turn them out into a KILLER lesbo shoot.Originally posted by -=LC=-





Comment
-
From what I understand, you are correct sir.Originally posted by shermsshackDefinitly 2257.... The restructuring is in place already, correct?Comment
-
-
Yup, scary there too.Originally posted by SolidScriptingAren't they rewriting 2257 to push through again?.Comment
-
Comment
-
That's my pick, becasue that approach is almost reasonable....I'm not sure about 5 years in the clink, but it would seem like it would actually protect kids.Originally posted by QualityMpegsNoone thinks Voluntary Labeling?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Don't laugh...it could be the downfall of all of us.Originally posted by A1R3KROFL
The Bush twins starting their own affiliate programComment
-
They can write and re-write all they want.Originally posted by xxxjayyes....
They can't get rid of the phrase 'overly restrictive and burdensome'
...the current congressional conservatives intent is to be OVERLY restrictive and burdensome.
I think any 2257 issues will be ultimately blocked by the courts as long as those last 2 conservatives don't go too blindly Jebus on us.
That is really my only concern.
If we knew for a fact that the current supremes were solidly judicial and didn't have any thread of talibanism running through there veins I would not sweat it at all.

EasyWebcamPro - FREE Script to Promote TopCams.com!
100 Profiles Loaded * Contact Us For Your FREE Copy *
ICQ: 328477888 - http://www.solidscripting.com - [email protected]Comment
-
I don't know about that,Originally posted by SolidScriptingThey can write and re-write all they want.
They can't get rid of the phrase 'overly restrictive and burdensome'
...the current congressional conservatives intent is to be OVERLY restrictive and burdensome.
I think any 2257 issues will be ultimately blocked by the courts as long as those last 2 conservatives don't go too blindly Jebus on us.
That is really my only concern.
If we knew for a fact that the current supremes were solidly judicial and didn't have any thread of talibanism running through there veins I would not sweat it at all.Comment
-
First they will hit us with a new 2257, and on the same bill push throught the 25% tax.
Right after that the .xxx will be started up again. and if all of that is not enough, Hillary will win the next election, providing someone finds a way to removie king bush from power.Comment
-
Originally posted by czarinaRight after that the .xxx will be started up again. and if all of that is not enough, Hillary will win the next election, providing someone finds a way to removie king bush from power.
She will outlaw all adult except lesbian
.Comment
-
It's going to the Senate - already passed the house.Originally posted by shermsshackDefinitly 2257.... The restructuring is in place already, correct?
http://www.fight2257.com/fight-2257/...dult-porn-avn/
Great article by Mark Kernes of AVN.Comment
-
As a photographer this bothers me, alot.
Sec. 606, ?PROHIBITING THE PRODUCTION OF OBSCENITY AS WELL AS TRANSPORTATION, DISTRIBUTION, AND SALE.?
Over the course of a shoot, (stills or video), sometimes only a fraction of images captured are used. Something "obscene" may be captured, edited out for finished product, never seen by the public .... but you did "produce" it, "transported" it from location to offices for editing.
Now you are guilty, two counts for something the public never sees.
.Comment
-
Worrisome---Net Neutrality (where Congress passes that bill to let cable/phone companies charge for access to certain places, like porn sites??????).Comment





Comment