View Single Post
Old 05-03-2006, 11:12 AM  
ronaldo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ICQ#: 272000271
Posts: 5,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by clickhappy
She defended the Duke university stripper saying that the woman was just trying to make a living and others were trying to demonize her because of her adult profession.

and she defended anna nicole smith a playboy playmate, from people saying she was just a stripper and doesnt deserve the money.
So its not like shes totally the church lady or evangelical. Just saying
But do you see the trend? Defending the woman at all costs. The MAN is always guilty...no matter what the proof says.

For the record, I have no problem with her defending either of the two you mention on the GROUNDS you mention, but the Duke university stipper's credibility will be an issue for pretty much everyone EXCEPT Nancy Grace. Even if she admitted to lying, Nancy Grace would probably STILL say something happened and someone is forcing her to say she's lying. That's her rationale.
ronaldo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote