View Single Post
Old 04-23-2006, 04:48 PM  
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
I am going to go back to the Windows analogy.

So, if you had Windows 95, you would not use the upgrade disk to install 98?

I don't think the (mpa) software itself was questionable, just the use of some of the available features.

I understand your point , like i said its completely plausible ,

but because of the previous " problems " associated with the previous version , i would expect a fresh start not an upgrade with names like "shave" that may be percieved to be "shady" by potential clients..

The 95 - 98 analogy isnt exactly the best analogy..

If bill gates had built a component into windows 95 that allowed your i.s.p. to steal money from you, then you can be DAMN sure i wouldn't use an upgraded version of it when i paid for 98 and never used the 95..

This being said , all that matter is consumer confidence , and although this is more than likely nothing more than what was explained by oystein, it sure helps when your more transparent about things..
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote