It depends on what you want out of the camera really. The rebel is a great camera and so is the 828, but both hit different "niches" if you will. The rebel has some advantages so does the 828... and both have some downfalls. Time to compare the features on each and decide which is most important to you...
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
I use a Digital Rebel and I like the fact that it is light and easy to handle with one hand and one finger unlike the bigger Canon cameras which are much heavier. It's all about the lens, light and the composition and focus. As far as I am concerned there is no need for those heavy-ass bodies unless you are going to be taking lots of pics in super-fast (fractions of a second) speed.
The white balance is fucking crap and the exposure settings are very inconsistant. You can take three pictures in the same settings and eack one will be different. When using a flashgun it just does its own fucking thing.
There are some good points, such as the speed. It's very quick and the remote trigger is good. But the general picture quality is not what you'd expect on a camera of this price.
Have a look on the Canon website at the FAQ and Problem solving page, Most of the questions and problems are with the EOS 300d. And most of the answers or help is fucking useless.
I had a Nikon 5700 coolpix before which is a more downmarket camera, but it produced far better pics.
I'll go with Nikon again next time and just write off the canon as a loss.
Comment