Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GatorB
It's who proposing it. Bush and his ilk have made no bones about their desire to rid the web of porn. I question his real motives. Also did you not read the part where he wants all ISPs to keep track of EVERYONE's web activities? WTF is this China. No wonder he and the China ruler are buddies.
I'm sure Hitler had some good ideas too, but would you be for any of them?
|
Why didn't you copy and paste the entire article. It looks like this started with Clinton.
""""
An idea once proposed by Democrats
The Bush administration's embrace of a rating system backed by criminal penalties is uncannily reminiscent of where the Clinton administration and a Democratic member of Congress were a decade ago.
In the mid-1990s, the then-nascent Internet industry began backing the Platform for Internet Content Selection, or PICS. The idea was simple: let Web sites self-rate, or let a third-party service offer ratings, and permit parents to set their browsers to never show certain types of content. Netscape and Microsoft soon agreed to support it in their browsers.
At a White House summit in July 1997
hosted by President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore, the head of the Lycos search engine proposed that only rated pages would be indexed. (Bob Davis, the president of Lycos at the time, said: "I threw a gauntlet to other search engines in today's meeting saying that collectively we should require a rating before we index pages.") Sen. Patty Murray, a
Democrat from Washington state, suggested that misrating a Web site should be a federal crime. And Australian government officials began talking about making self-rating mandatory. """