Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites
It has not been determined that the "phone tapping" is illegal and the subject has been and is still being debated, but the consensus thus far, among constitutional legal scholars, appears to be that the President not only has the power via the Constitution, but the obligation to carry out "phone tapping". In addition the consensus appears to be that the Congress cannot enact a law that places limits on the power that is provided to the President via the Constitution unless the Supreme Court agrees that the law passed by the Congress is legally binding upon the President.
You saying that "there are high crimes he has committed" does not make it so and unless you are a constitutional scholar your statement does not bear any credibility.
|
The problem is the way the constitution is being defined. The president and his administration have found ways to interperate the constitition in a way that gives them a right to do what they want. Talk to other "scholars" and they say the constitution means something else. Unfortunetly scholars don't have the power or persuasian that the US government has.
And I may not be a scholar, but it doesn't take one to see that he has commited high crimes. There are a lot of things people know about him and his administration but they can't make progress in proving it. What about all those highly educated men and women that continue to talk how the Bush admin constently keeps them from saying certain truths to the media. The administration is a bunch of bully's and they don't want the American public knowing the truth about many things. They have so much power that they can control what people say and don't say.
If you don't think he has commited any crimes than I think you are just silly.