View Single Post
Old 04-16-2006, 07:19 PM  
seeric
..........
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ..........
Posts: 41,917
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Buck
Airek.. i really mean no ofeense here but it seems that it IS what I thought... why is that in some way "pro revshare" ? A revshare program that went down and tons of people lost millions of dollars.


All it does is validate the fact that with revshare one puts their LONG TERM financial viability into a single pornographer. Re-read my post, one of my biggest reasons for saying revshare is disadvantageous is because if that program shuts down (ala busty amateurs) you can lose your ass... with PPS your receivables are more like 2 weeks, not 2 years.

Sorry that you were caught up in it man, but it is a piece of internet history.
i agree that people should not put all their eggs in one basket. i can also assure you that had busty stayed in business it would have had a pps model. guaranteed. the change in the industry and consumer mindset would have dictated that. revshare was where it was for the era it lived in. pps did not become the big thing till later, much later.

busty was at its biggest earning months when it was shut down. it was flourishing. we all got jacked. members, affiliates, employees, hosting company, you name it.


somethings i would do revshare on and some i will only ever do pps. both are viable business models in the right situations.

i see what you mean. we live and learn.

Last edited by seeric; 04-16-2006 at 07:20 PM..
seeric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote