100 under age models
WARNING: DoMyPhoto.com selling underaged model sets?!?
Collapse
X
-
-
That's what my broken English to English dictionary says tooOriginally posted by cyberxxxOk, here is the Russian to English translation: "Hi Logan, she was over 18 at the moment when I sold you her pics. What's the problem?"
LIZZIE 
Comment
-
Yea, but you shouldn't pick on girlsOriginally posted by Antoniolol
couldn't resist ;)
And that poor boy is sooo ugly!
LIZZIE 
Comment
-
Comment
-
Ok, but why you not answer now?Originally posted by ModelPerfectLook at my last post...I clearly stated I had to leave for a few hours...that's why I haven't replied yet, Mark. I'm just stopping by to check in...I have to be somewhere for the next couple of hours again...I'll reply when I get back.Comment
-
I see now why you like the war on public.Originally posted by ModelPerfect...And for the record, there are several different kinds of teachers...I teach martial arts. You assume too much...not that there would be anything wrong with that anyway. I remember one of the biggest names in adult (a few years ago anyway) being a former guidance counselor.Comment
-
OK...I cut my meeting short so I can address this. I'll answer in order...Originally posted by m2mmOk Logan.
1. you reselling my content over one year. Right? Do you have any problems before? I think you bought hundrest sets from me.
2. you received this content in Dec 2004. Why you told here that you received it in Sep 2004?
3. you ask me about this problem two days back. I told you: show me please ID of this model. I send wrong release probably. Or you can read Russian yourself?
4. show here please ID of this model and I will show her release. So webmasters will check it. I think you would like delete competitor via this way. If not then show please ID here.
5. do you have content of my models who have under 18 now?
6. if you think I provide wrong papers WHY you not deleted my content from your site still?
You was my customer over one year without problems. But you not value good partner. Miserable
1) I've been working with you...or at least buying content from you...Since March of 2004, so yeah; it's been almost a year. And I don't feel I had been mistreated...this isn't about that. I wouldn't say there's not been problems. The first order took over 2 months to receive 5,000 pics when the original estimate was 3 weeks for 10,000 pics. And of course I didn't get all the docs or licenses for a long time after that. And then there was the time you resold a set that you sold as exclusive...y'know? everyone makes mistakes; I don't think anyone is above that. That's why I haven't severed our relationship because of these things. This issue, however, is one I can't overlook. I don't hold personal grudges, but I still feel I have a responsibility to my friends and to other webmasters who may inadvertently publish content that was overlooked by you. Note: I'm not saying you did this on purpose, but the consequences would still be the same for the webmaster.
2) I received the content on Sept 9, 2004. The screenshot you posted earlier simply shows the date of the folders which reflects the latest activity in the folder. That would be when you added the docs.
3) All our communication is posted. You have the IDs already. If not, check the ftp I set up for you...I haven't deleted yet, and you can get the same ids I have. Suz is the 15. Ella, Mara, Saka, and April are 17 judging by the ids and releases. And the releases are in English not Russian...the IDs are Russian, but babelfish is all you need to confirm the text by the date says birthdate.
4) I'm not posting the IDs. I don't know enough about the legal consequences to do so. In the US, the release is invalid (minors cannot enter legally binding contracts), so I don't want to post her "likeness". Feel free to do so yourself...as I said before, they are still in the folder. No offense, but I don't think of you as my competition...you said you don't even want to sell non-exclusive anymore and I was going to be your only seller...so there's no point.
5) That doesn't matter. It's how old they are in the photo.
6) I never said all your content was illegal...I don't see any point in deleting content that I have verified as being legal...Comment
-
Comment
-
Damn that guy wiht the knife is ugly..
Comment
-
You know as well as I do that I do have the IDs and releases. I wouldn't base this just on the release...how could I figure out her age if I only had one date?!? See my last post regarding posting IDs.Originally posted by m2mmyes, Logan not have claims to ID's. Just to two releases (from 300 releases). So can I do two mistakes in 300 things? And I proposed to Logan choose it. But Logan prefer big drama on GFY.
So Logan. Show please here ID's and I will show correct releases.Comment
-
The birthdate I got off the IDs, the release dates I obviously got off the releases.Originally posted by freeadultcontentI was going to ask if by chance the date was reversed, which has caused panic to me before as well when buying from europe. But it looks like with what you posted above you already accounted for that. Well except for the release signed one which doesnt match the date of june 11th (june 6th) yet either way the year is correct.
Did you get copies of the passports as well? If so have you checked those in relationship to the releases?Comment
-
Do you have any facts? Or words only? If I gave you so much problems why you bought and bought content from me after it?Originally posted by ModelPerfectOK...I cut my meeting short so I can address this. I'll answer in order...
1) I've been working with you...or at least buying content from you...Since March of 2004, so yeah; it's been almost a year. And I don't feel I had been mistreated...this isn't about that. I wouldn't say there's not been problems. The first order took over 2 months to receive 5,000 pics when the original estimate was 3 weeks for 10,000 pics. And of course I didn't get all the docs or licenses for a long time after that. And then there was the time you resold a set that you sold as exclusive...y'know? everyone makes mistakes; I don't think anyone is above that. That's why I haven't severed our relationship because of these things. This issue, however, is one I can't overlook. I don't hold personal grudges, but I still feel I have a responsibility to my friends and to other webmasters who may inadvertently publish content that was overlooked by you. Note: I'm not saying you did this on purpose, but the consequences would still be the same for the webmaster.
2) I received the content on Sept 9, 2004. The screenshot you posted earlier simply shows the date of the folders which reflects the latest activity in the folder. That would be when you added the docs.
3) All our communication is posted. You have the IDs already. If not, check the ftp I set up for you...I haven't deleted yet, and you can get the same ids I have. Suz is the 15. Ella, Mara, Saka, and April are 17 judging by the ids and releases. And the releases are in English not Russian...the IDs are Russian, but babelfish is all you need to confirm the text by the date says birthdate.
4) I'm not posting the IDs. I don't know enough about the legal consequences to do so. In the US, the release is invalid (minors cannot enter legally binding contracts), so I don't want to post her "likeness". Feel free to do so yourself...as I said before, they are still in the folder. No offense, but I don't think of you as my competition...you said you don't even want to sell non-exclusive anymore and I was going to be your only seller...so there's no point.
5) That doesn't matter. It's how old they are in the photo.
6) I never said all your content was illegal...I don't see any point in deleting content that I have verified as being legal...
And if you had little problems only why you show it on GFY? I told you: I will not talk with you? I asked what should I do, you said: we will talk later. No?
I'm sure - you post it here because you want move me as competitor. No? Then why?Comment
-
[QUOTE=ModelPerfect]
4) I'm not posting the IDs. I don't know enough about the legal consequences to do so. In the US, the release is invalid (minors cannot enter legally binding contracts), so I don't want to post her "likeness". Feel free to do so yourself...as I said before, they are still in the folder. No offense, but I don't think of you as my competition...you said you don't even want to sell non-exclusive anymore and I was going to be your only seller...so there's no point.
[QUOTE]
ok, I sent it. HERE
What you will answer now?Comment
-
I'm not avoiding you Mark...I was simply away...as I told the board I would be before I left. I'm back now. And I put the question marks up on purpose...I want answers.Originally posted by m2mmTitle of this topic: "WARNING: DoMyPhoto.com selling underaged model sets?!? "
If Logan sure about it why he use my content still? He not told "WARNING: DoMyPhoto.com selling PART underaged model sets?!?"
If Logan unsure about if WHY he open this topic?
I tell again: Logan try to avoid competitor. Via bad way. WHY you not see it???
And again: WHERE YOU, LOGAN? WHY YOU NOT ANSWER? Guys, you do him work now. I hope he will tell 'thank'. Strange forum. Only scandals here.Comment
-
Mark, I would love to have this all cleared up. I don't think you're a bad guy, but there are some issues that I just can't walk away from. This is one of them. I'm sure somewhere there was an error, but that's not something we're really allowed.Originally posted by m2mmI see this topic is too long. Let me propose next:
1. I'm sorry, I got very upset when people was accused me of underage.
2. Logan, when you comes back, post please the names of the models and I will post IDs.
3. I don't sell underage and I want to clear this up.
Thanks for your advices, lessons and even swearing
I hope all will know who is right in short time 
Comment
-
yes, I use glasses. But I see jet:Originally posted by swedguy04.04.1984 Mara date-of-birth
02.01.2002 Signed the release
17 years old
13.08.1984 Saka date-of-birth
05.06.2002 Signed the release
17 years old

04.04.1984 Mara date-of-birth
09.01.2002 Signed the release
No?
13.08.1984 Saka date-of-birth
05.06.2003 Signed the release
No?Comment
-
Then WHY you post it on GFY? Can we discuss about it without people? I not answered on your messages? WHY?Originally posted by ModelPerfectMark, I would love to have this all cleared up. I don't think you're a bad guy, but there are some issues that I just can't walk away from. This is one of them. I'm sure somewhere there was an error, but that's not something we're really allowed.Comment
-
What the fuck is wrong with you.Originally posted by m2mmI see it now. Sorry. I not thought Logan will show it. Because he told in this dialogue than he is teacher. Can teacher do adult business in US?
You shoot underage nude models and you try to play it off by saying that he is an adult webmaster and a teacher?
No, i would rather have you. Someone sick fuck shooting underage models.Originally posted by m2mmReally? Do you want such teacher for your children?
Care about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?Comment
-
Did you see the ID's of my models? Did you buy content from me? Why you told it? Or you think you can convict me? Who are you? The Fool. I miserable time for youOriginally posted by kaliboy2gWhat the fuck is wrong with you.
You shoot underage nude models and you try to play it off by saying that he is an adult webmaster and a teacher?
No, i would rather have you. Someone sick fuck shooting underage models.

Comment
-
Translation for you guys:
Originally posted by cyberxxxm2mm: nu u tebya i angliyskiy blin. udivlyaius', kak ludi voobshe tut tebya ponimayut...
2all: sorry for the non-English remark above.
m2mm: Damn you have horrible english. I am amazed at how people here can understand you.
Originally posted by m2mmdumaesh' im eto vagno? im vagno chto ya russkii
Do you think they fucking care? All they care about is the fact that im russian.Care about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?Comment
-
are you reaterted?????????????Originally posted by kaliboy2gWhat the fuck is wrong with you.
You shoot underage nude models and you try to play it off by saying that he is an adult webmaster and a teacher?
No, i would rather have you. Someone sick fuck shooting underage models.

He did NOT shoot underage models. He posted the IDs and the release forms
Can you read?Comment
-
Mark...now I'm really confused.Originally posted by m2mmOk, I put all ID's HERE
What you think now?
ELLA: You have the same ID and Release zipped (as near as I can tell, since you blurred it), but THE BIRTHDATE IS DIFFERENT!!! WTF?!? Mine clearly states 19.12.1984
MARA: This is the same ID and release I have. 04.04.1984 to 29.01.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until April of 2002)
SAKA: This is the same ID and release I have. 13.08.1984 to 05.06.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until August of 2002)
SUZ: Totally different everything.Comment
-
You misunderstand martial artsOriginally posted by m2mmI see now why you like the war on public.Comment
-
Comment
-
Don't threaten me, Mark. I only started this thread to do what is right. You're own posting of IDs proved my point. Two of the ids you posted show the girls were 17 when they signed the releases.Originally posted by m2mmyou thought: Mark will not protect here. Now you see - I can wage war also. You will remember me.Comment
-
If you plan to insult my intelligence, please spell retarted correctly.Originally posted by Antonioare you reaterted?????????????
He did NOT shoot underage models. He posted the IDs and the release forms
Can you read?
From the zip i downloaded:
Saka was born
13-08-1984
Because there is no 13th month, we assume that the date means August 8, 1984. Her relase form is 05-06-2002
That could either mean May 06, 2002 making her 17 something
Or that can mean June 05, 2002 making her 17 something
That is underage.
Now who is the
"reaterted" one
Care about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?Comment
-
Here's all the dates I have for the ids/releases/sets:
Ella (non-nude set)
Birthdate: 19.12.1984
Release date: 30.02.02
Mara (Full-nude with spread)
Birthdate: 04.04.1984
Release date: 29.01.02
Saka (Full-nude)
Birthdate: 13.08.1984
Release date: 05.06.02
Suz (Topless with thong)
Birthdate: 20.10.1986
Release date: 11.06.02
April (no sets in possession, just docs)
Birthdate: 01.10.1985
Release date: 11.02.03Comment
-
I'm confused much more.Originally posted by ModelPerfectMark...now I'm really confused.
ELLA: You have the same ID and Release zipped (as near as I can tell, since you blurred it), but THE BIRTHDATE IS DIFFERENT!!! WTF?!? Mine clearly states 19.12.1984
MARA: This is the same ID and release I have. 04.04.1984 to 29.01.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until April of 2002)
SAKA: This is the same ID and release I have. 13.08.1984 to 05.06.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until August of 2002)
SUZ: Totally different everything.
ELLA: You have the same ID and Release zipped (as near as I can tell, since you blurred it), but THE BIRTHDATE IS DIFFERENT!!! WTF?!? Mine clearly states 19.12.1984
Hi, who speak Russian here? Look please ID of Ella. Please comparate ID and release. It's same girl?
Logan, I know you not know Russian so you may speak here all.
-----------------
MARA: This is the same ID and release I have. 04.04.1984 to 29.01.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until April of 2002)
Delete PLEASE wrong release what you downloaded from my server 8 months back. I told you many times: I changed it on server.
-------------------
SAKA: This is the same ID and release I have. 13.08.1984 to 05.06.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until August of 2002)
Look please BETTER. Release signed 05.06.03!!! not 05.06.02
---------------------
SUZ: Totally different everything.
Again. Her name is Suzanne (ask Russian guys) so it is Suz. I not sure why you not use it.
So? What more?Comment
-
This shows how important using a standard date format is in some cases... However not this one. Sad m2mm, very sad.Originally posted by kaliboy2gIf you plan to insult my intelligence, please spell retarted correctly.
From the zip i downloaded:
Saka was born
13-08-1984
Because there is no 13th month, we assume that the date means August 8, 1984. Her relase form is 05-06-2002
That could either mean May 06, 2002 making her 17 something
Or that can mean June 05, 2002 making her 17 something
That is underage.
Now who is the
"reaterted" one
Free agentComment
-
Comment
-
It might say 09 instead of 02 on Mara as I said, but it still makes her 17 (January 9 instead of January 2).Originally posted by m2mmyes, I use glasses. But I see jet:
04.04.1984 Mara date-of-birth
09.01.2002 Signed the release
No?
13.08.1984 Saka date-of-birth
05.06.2003 Signed the release
No?
As far as I see it says 2002 (if you compare the 2's on the other rel forms) on Saka, which make her 17.Comment
-
I understand some russian. THe realse name on the model is "Bella" Her ID name is listed ad "Ella" Might be the same girl, she could have added the B on the realease form.Originally posted by m2mmI'm confused much more.
ELLA: You have the same ID and Release zipped (as near as I can tell, since you blurred it), but THE BIRTHDATE IS DIFFERENT!!! WTF?!? Mine clearly states 19.12.1984
Hi, who speak Russian here? Look please ID of Ella. Please comparate ID and release. It's same girl?
Logan, I know you not know Russian so you may speak here all.
-----------------
MARA: This is the same ID and release I have. 04.04.1984 to 29.01.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until April of 2002)
Delete PLEASE wrong release what you downloaded from my server 8 months back. I told you many times: I changed it on server.
-------------------
SAKA: This is the same ID and release I have. 13.08.1984 to 05.06.02 = 17 (she doesn't turn 18 until August of 2002)
Look please BETTER. Release signed 05.06.03!!! not 05.06.02
---------------------
SUZ: Totally different everything.
Again. Her name is Suzanne (ask Russian guys) so it is Suz. I not sure why you not use it.
So? What more?
Mara:
If her realse form is truelt 9-01-02. Now because you dont use the same date standard we do, this means she signed January 1, 2002, and was born April 4, 1984. SHe was seventenn in January
Saka:
The release form is signed in 02 not 03, dont BS.
Suz:
Perfectly fine.Care about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?Comment
-
Why January 9? September 2. 09.01.02 not?Originally posted by swedguyIt might say 09 instead of 02 on Mara as I said, but it still makes her 17 (January 9 instead of January 2).
As far as I see it says 2002 (if you compare the 2's on the other rel forms) on Saka, which make her 17.
it's '3' not '2'Comment
-
Originally posted by m2mmWhy January 9? September 2. 09.01.02 not?
it's '3' not '2'
No No, i doubt you would mess around like taht.
ALl the IDs, are in the date-month-year format.
Dont try to pull off this BS about the release forms being in month-date-yearCare about me?
Who?
Me!
Who?Comment
-
ok, did you see on release of Ella word 'Ella' on top? Secretary did mistake because we have sisters Ella and Bella with same last names. And secretary put real name on top. I sent to Logan release named as "ella' and ID named as "ella'. what problem?Originally posted by kaliboy2gI understand some russian. THe realse name on the model is "Bella" Her ID name is listed ad "Ella" Might be the same girl, she could have added the B on the realease form.
Mara:
If her realse form is truelt 9-01-02. Now because you dont use the same date standard we do, this means she signed January 1, 2002, and was born April 4, 1984. SHe was seventenn in January
Saka:
The release form is signed in 02 not 03, dont BS.
Suz:
Perfectly fine.
why I don't use your standart? Who said it? You choose standarts as you like. No, Mara signed release October 1th.
Russian '2' have tail. Did you see tail on this release? So it 2003 year.Comment

Comment