Scrubbing the fault of processors or merchant banks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DirtyGold-Doug
    Registered User
    • Jan 2005
    • 62

    #1

    Scrubbing the fault of processors or merchant banks?

    I am wondering if scrubbing is really in the hands of processors or the merchant banks when the transactions are posted

    likely each processor has their own blacklists, but after that, randomly declining transactions doesn't make sense
    SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
  • vicki
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2002
    • 1478

    #2
    both

    the gateway processor usually have their own fraud controls in place to top of the banks
    If at first you do succeed - try to hide your astonishment.

    HR merchant accounts from 3.45%
    solid biz since 98
    victoriakozub AT gmail.com
    skype: victoria.kozub | ICQ: 74296746

    Comment

    • Kimmykim
      bitchslapping zebras!!!!!
      • Jun 2001
      • 16015

      #3
      Processing isn't quite as cut and dry as that, Doug. While alot of processors use a negative database as their decline base, many of them, like CCBill or gateways using ProfileCheck, for instance, also use a scoring system, which is similar to say, a credit loan application. Then you also factor in things like CVV2 to finalize the scrub authorization or decline.

      Acquiring AND issuing banks may also have their own reasons for turning down a transaction, based on their own criteria that revolves around the cardholders spending habits or the banks own internal rule system.

      Comment

      • BV
        wtf
        • Sep 2001
        • 10914

        #4
        something is fucked up wherever it's being done

        Comment

        Working...