CECASH down?

BIG B from CECash here..

I dont see any alerts.. I have been here and on the sites since 6AM PT.

all sites loading here from the CECash.com offices.
I checked with others outside the office and it seems there must be an ISP or routing problem somewhere on the Net. Some traceroutes reach us and some are failing currently.

I am doing traceroutes now and our tech staff is checking troubles from inside and outside the offices.
I see that Cogent, willtell and adelphia have huge latency right now on the net.
We are checking all here

Thanks for the heads up !!


BIG B
CECash.com

fast response....lol

all working here.

VERY VERY slow for me too, will post the trace in a few

Bezig met het traceren van de route naar www.cecash.com [64.125.99.196]
via maximaal 30 hops:

3 * * 17 ms bbn-1-tc1-core-1-ge-0-0-2-0.router.nl.demon.net
[213.222.28.246]
4 20 ms 19 ms 17 ms tc1-border-2-ae-1-0.router.nl.demon.net [82.161.
255.42]
5 19 ms 20 ms 19 ms ge9-0.mpr2.ams1.nl.above.net [82.98.253.37]
6 401 ms 402 ms 408 ms pos3-0.cr1.ams2.nl.above.net [64.125.31.169]
7 25 ms 24 ms 24 ms so-5-0-0.cr1.lhr3.uk.above.net [64.125.31.153]
8 96 ms 98 ms 99 ms so-7-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.31.186]
9 135 ms 134 ms 148 ms so-5-1-0.cr2.ord2.us.above.net [64.125.30.226]
10 350 ms 353 ms 352 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.ord2.us.above.net [64.125.29.185]
11 401 ms 411 ms 426 ms so-3-1-0.mpr3.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.30.209]

12 402 ms 408 ms 401 ms so-2-0-0.er10a.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.30.90]

13 190 ms 187 ms 185 ms host104-157.tncservers.com [64.125.104.157]
14 403 ms 403 ms 397 ms misc2.sjc.tncservers.net [64.125.99.196]

De trace is voltooid.

C:\Documents and Settings\Andre>

We've double checked paysite and database servers and the trouble is not in-house. However there are still some traceroutes that are broken from certain ISPs.

Our techies are still working to see if anything can be done on our end to remedy.

Big B
CECash.com

They look fine to me as well...

Seems they are back up.

everythings working on my end

Works here, although the response is quite slow.

works here