Adult Industry Attorney

**fatfoo** · 07-07-2010, 01:12 PM

I think in Toronto women are allowed to walk topless outside, even.
Rules about tits are different in different locations.

**Jon Oso** · 07-07-2010, 01:38 PM

adultbizlaw.com

**deadbabes** · 07-07-2010, 01:43 PM

Originally posted by Jon Oso

adultbizlaw.com

thanks, jon

**dillonaire** · 07-07-2010, 01:46 PM

what if the guy is topless. do you still need 2257?

**2MuchMark** · 07-07-2010, 02:06 PM

tits = porn = illegal in most places still, unfortunately.

**BigDeanEvans** · 07-07-2010, 02:13 PM

There is one in FL and may i suggest you be very careful with your retainer because they will bleed it fucking dry before you even use them.

**Way3** · 07-07-2010, 02:17 PM

You may want see if Larry Walters can help you. He is in Florida!
http://firstamendment.com/

**CIVMatt** · 07-07-2010, 02:19 PM

Can I see your tits?

**Ron Bennett** · 07-07-2010, 02:20 PM

Below is a copy and paste of my reply from the thread http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=972124 regarding clothed models. While the OPs situation in that thread is different, my response to it, and that of others, will likely be helpful in regards to your question too.

If the pictures are intended to be of a sexual nature (and/or the websites / venues they're shown in), even if no nudity, 2257 would be wise to have.

Nudity alone isn't what determines whether a 2257 is required or not, but rather the intended use of the pictures. Nudism books, such as one will find on Amazon, B&N, etc, often have no 2257s on file and depict people of all ages, including minors, in the nude.

Digress a bit, but point is that it's how the pictures are posed / intended use that determines whether one needs a 2257 ... based on what you've described, in my view, you need to ensure all models, even those fully clothed, are of legal age and have 2257s for all of them.

With all that said, definitely consult with an attorney experienced with the adult business before hiring any models, let alone shooting any content.

Ron

**pornlaw** · 07-07-2010, 06:55 PM

Originally posted by deadbabes

I can't find anyone in my area, concerning the interpretation of 2257. All I want to do is show tits on my site. No porn, no cock, no vag, just tits. There was an attorney (I believe he was from Tampa, FL.) who posted here awhile back. Does anyone know his name? Thanks in advance!

Im the attorney that owns AdultBizLaw.com. Let me save you some money.

Tits, just regular bare tits are considered nudity and exempt from 2257 regs. Squeeze a nipple and now you have content that will require docs and IDs.

**V_RocKs** · 07-08-2010, 03:41 PM

What about if the tits are on a site that is promoting them for porn?

**L-Pink** · 07-08-2010, 03:44 PM

Originally posted by fatfoo

I think in Toronto women are allowed to walk topless outside, even.
Rules about tits are different in different locations.

They can where I live as well ..... in Tampa.

.

**deadbabes** · 07-08-2010, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by pornlaw

Im the attorney that owns AdultBizLaw.com. Let me save you some money.

Tits, just regular bare tits are considered nudity and exempt from 2257 regs. Squeeze a nipple and now you have content that will require docs and IDs.

Thanks so much for that response. I'll be taking down your information, should I ever need it.

**Ron Bennett** · 07-08-2010, 05:49 PM

Originally posted by V_RocKs

What about if the tits are on a site that is promoting them for porn?

Then you likely need 2257s.

Ron

Adult Industry Attorney

Adult Industry Attorney

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment