Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BoogieCFZ
Example 1: yes. because of watermarked and branded content.
|
This is the problem. Content is to be used to promote the sponsor that provided the content Watermark or no Watermark. A watermark is not a clickable link. In bed with faith did not give them that content to promote AFF. I don't see how you can think that is acceptable. I mean come on it's common sense. I guarantee not a single paysite owner would allow that.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BoogieCFZ
Example 3: yes, has a TON of links to nextdoornikki. Every page you click on has one. Some dozen or more links to the sponsor.
|
You are missing the point. The content is being used in a misleading way. People read top to bottom, right? At the bottom of this gallery are links to other sponsors and none to nikki.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BoogieCFZ
Example 5: one of the largest watermarks I've ever seen + several links to the sponsor, seems fair game to me.
|
I bet penthouse hasn't seen this yet. No paysite owner would allow this unless they were desperate.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BoogieCFZ
example 6: massive watermarks again, every large sized image has a link to penthouse. Borderline but why not? Penthouse is getting brand recognition, buzz, and typeins from it as well as banner clicks.
|
Boogie you are obviously new to the industry and very unaware of how paysite owners feel. I have a feeling this thread may be an awakening for you and it will give you a heads up on what paysites feel is acceptable. That will allows you to be ahead of the other sites and compliant and making money.