Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shap
Simple question for you. There are 6 examples above, do you think they should be allowed to do that?
|
Example 1: yes. because of watermarked and branded content.
Example 2: borderline, no watermarks on content, unclear where it came from. I've seen TGP galleries and free sites that do this or worse for years tho. Seems acceptable practice, but I wouldnt do it.
Example 3: yes, has a TON of links to nextdoornikki. Every page you click on has one. Some dozen or more links to the sponsor.
example 4: not great. But this is ripped from a magazine? With the current legal landscape they can do this until they recieve a C and D.
Example 5: one of the largest watermarks I've ever seen + several links to the sponsor, seems fair game to me.
example 6: massive watermarks again, every large sized image has a link to penthouse. Borderline but why not? Penthouse is getting brand recognition, buzz, and typeins from it as well as banner clicks.