[QUOTE=directfiesta]He gave you the reason .. but you are too dumb to undersrtand what is written ...
Quote:
* The extent of the damage and severity of the fires are thought to be too minimal to have resulted in the loss of the building. New York Fire Department personnel on the scene describe the damage inflicted to the south face of WTC 7. Many question why so few photographs or video of this building's damage exists, given the below reports of such widespread damage. The following quotes document the impressions of authorities on the scene. [36] These statements were given by firefighters and other first responders:
* "The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro
Article
Oups, sorry for the link; I know you never post any links, just give your personnal opinions backed up by your immense knowledge of structural engeneering 9 in this threrad ...  )....
Now, back to your spoon
|
You should learn about the maliability of metal, and what happens to metal under pressure that is heated in a spot.
Also go look at every video you can find of that collapse. Find me one showing an explosion.