"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." Washington, D.C., Sept. 13, 2001
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." Washington, D.C., March 13, 2002
------------------------------
"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories hahaha65533; And we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." Washington, D.C., May 30, 2003
"Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!" President George W. Bush, joking about his administration's failure to find WMDs in Iraq as he narrated a comic slideshow during the Radio & TV Correspondents' Association dinner, Washington, D.C., March 24, 2004
Why did we give up looking for him? He is no longer a priority yet he killed 3000 American citizens? Why is that? It makes no sense to me. Oh yeah, he doesn't carry any oil around in his pockets.
No WMD. Saddam was one hell of a threat to our safety. Glad we got him out of there. He could have started shooting spitballs at any moment!!
News flash. Bin Laden killed 3000 of OUR people. Oh but lets give up on him and get Saddam. Makes perfect sense.
News Flash, 300,000 Iraqi lives are worth more than 3000 American lives. A man the murders one man in America is just as guilty as a man that murders another man in Africa. Isolationism will do nothing but allow others to hate you more and more, and rally up more troops that have "Faith". Fuck the greedy American liberal mindset that doesn't want to get involved with the world we fucking live on.
You either stand with us or against us. How about we invade every country who supported terrorists past or present.
First stop: Saudi Arabia.
We invaded Iraq because they had weapons of mass destruction! They were a threat to the United States! That is what we told ourselves and the world.
This is a list of other countries that are known by the world to also have weapons of mass destruction. In order to avoid exposing our mistruths we should get started invading these other countries so the world will see that we weren't lying about why we invaded Iraq . . . (and so we can be safe).
Which one is next? How about North Korea who has said fuck off to the U.S.A.? They said they will continue to develop nuclear weapons and use them on us if we try to stop them. Iraq never posed anywhere near the same level of threat. North Korea alone exposes our hypocrisy. Then consider the rest of the world filled with countries posing far more of a threat to the United States (than Iraq) and realize that NOBODY believed our stated reasons for invading Iraq.
Algeria
Belarus
Bulgaria
Chile
China
Cuba
Ethiopia
Egypt
France
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Kazakhstan
Laos
Libya
Myanmar
North Korea
Pakistan
Romania
Russia
Serbia
South Africa
South Korea
Sudan
Syria
Taiwan
Thailand
Ukraine
Vietnam
United Kingdom
I knew there had to be a good reason. I can rest easy now.
If he wasn't hiding, then we would have cought him. You guys act as if there isn't a complicated answer, there is no answer at all. Why didn't you find whoever when you were playing hide and go seek? Because he/she was fucking hiding.
If he wasn't hiding, then we would have cought him. You guys act as if there isn't a complicated answer, there is no answer at all.
By any chance, are you related to Dubya?????
If the US would have used half the troops allocated to Iraq and used them in Afghanistan/Pakistan, they would have found him....
But :
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." Washington, D.C., March 13, 2002
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Why did we give up looking for him? He is no longer a priority yet he killed 3000 American citizens? Why is that? It makes no sense to me. Oh yeah, he doesn't carry any oil around in his pockets.
No WMD. Saddam was one hell of a threat to our safety. Glad we got him out of there. He could have started shooting spitballs at any moment!!
Right, we have totally given up looking for him. Listen, stop listening to AirAmerica and Al Franken, then when you get back to reality you will know we still have troops in the middle east besides Iraq searching for Bin Laden as well as other terrorists.
And your post about Saddam not being a threat shows that you are a total moron.
Hurry up and answer your phone Michael Moore is calling you
If the US would have used half the troops allocated to Iraq and used them in Afghanistan/Pakistan, they would have found him....
But :
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." Washington, D.C., March 13, 2002
The number of foot soldiers does not matter. It's the intelligence. We found Saddam and his boys due to someone telling on them for money. Why in the fuck would you put thousands of troops in the middle of the desert to simply find one person? You have to be rational about it.
If we would have had troops in afganistan, you anti-war liberal shit heads would still be crying. Don't act as if the scenereo changed, your mindset would change. When you affiliate yourselves with a political party, you're a sheep, and you will do as your leader says in order to conform to the ideals around you.
"We should be in North Korea."
Bullshit, you would be crying about that as well.
"We don't need Saddam, we need Osama lol!!!!!!1111oneone"
We need whoever we can get.
"Make peace, not war."
I don't even want to touch that one. The tree huggers may shit themselves.
The number of foot soldiers does not matter. It's the intelligence. We found Saddam and his boys due to someone telling on them for money. Why in the fuck would you put thousands of troops in the middle of the desert to simply find one person? You have to be rational about it.
If we would have had troops in afganistan, you anti-war liberal shit heads would still be crying. Don't act as if the scenereo changed, your mindset would change. When you affiliate yourselves with a political party, you're a sheep, and you will do as your leader says in order to conform to the ideals around you.
"We should be in North Korea."
Bullshit, you would be crying about that as well.
"We don't need Saddam, we need Osama lol!!!!!!1111oneone"
We need whoever we can get.
"Make peace, not war."
I don't even want to touch that one. The tree huggers may shit themselves.
Fuck, the stench must be unbearable with your head up your ass so far.
"Don't be deceived when they tell you things are better now. Even if there's no poverty to be seen because the poverty's been hidden. Even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which industries foist on you and even if it seems to you that you never had so much, that is only the slogan of those who still have much more than you.
Don't be taken in when they paternally pat you on the shoulder and say that there's no inequality worth speaking of and no more reason to fight because if you believe them they will be completely in charge in their marble homes and granite banks from which they rob the people of the world under the pretence of bringing them culture.
Watch out, for as soon as it pleases them they'll send you out to protect their gold in wars whose weapons, rapidly developed by servile scientists, will become more and more deadly until they can with a flick of the finger tear a million of you to pieces."
The number of foot soldiers does not matter. It's the intelligence. We found Saddam and his boys due to someone telling on them for money. Why in the fuck would you put thousands of troops in the middle of the desert to simply find one person? You have to be rational about it.
Why were we even in Iraq? Do you ever read a newspaper?
"We should be in North Korea."
Only if Bush intends to make us believe he wasn't lying about Iraq.
"We don't need Saddam, we need Osama lol!!!!!!1111oneone"
What?
Osama = 9/11
We were supposed to be getting him not invading Iraq.
"Make peace, not war."
I agree, the last thing we need is to have less war in this world!
Right, we have totally given up looking for him. Listen, stop listening to AirAmerica and Al Franken, then when you get back to reality you will know we still have troops in the middle east besides Iraq searching for Bin Laden as well as other terrorists.
And your post about Saddam not being a threat shows that you are a total moron.
Hurry up and answer your phone Michael Moore is calling you
I don't listen to liberal news or conservative news. I read the argument from both sides and then make my own decision. Bush said it from his own mouth that we aren't concerned about Bin Laden. That wasn't me talking it was him. I am not arguing anyway, I won't change your viewpoint and you won't change mine. Just don't call me a moron for having an opinion ok fuckwad? Have a great rest of your weekend.
Osama bin Laden is just a character created by the government in order to put a face on someone that American's should be focused on instead of the shit that's going on in Iraq.
Drivel = meaningless talk you all do you speak meaningless talk .
You speak shit as in shit dribbling out you mouths.
Add the Mob you would have to study really hard just to get to the level of an idiot.
Why should I read a newspaper, let alone be brainwashed with the lies that American media presents to the sheep on a daily basis. That was one lame ass comment. "Do you ever read a newspaper". Wow, just fucking wow.
Only if Bush intends to make us believe he wasn't lying about Iraq.
He was misinformed by the British, Russian, United States, and French government about Iraq, but there were already reasons to be in Iraq before WMD were brought into play.
What?
Osama = 9/11
We were supposed to be getting him not invading Iraq.
Osama = War on Terror, just as Saddam. You can't take out Osama due to personal reasons when there is a much bigger picture.
I agree, the last thing we need is to have less war in this world!
If you want less war, then you should be for the massive reform that will take place in the middle east. You just can't lie to yourself and act as if America left Iraq alone, that they would be a country of peace towards us later on, or can you?
Do you like to kill for fun on the weekend?
That was a stupid comment. Thank you for making an ass out of yourself for me.
"I just want you to know that, when we talk about war, we're really talking about peace." Washington, D.C. June 18, 2002
G.W. Bush
Yes, and George Bush is correct, but only after intelligent thought is put into the the idea. It's easy be a mindless drone that laughs at Bush without giving him the fair chance of comprehending what he says. You guys are sheep, and I bah at you all in mockery. Baaaahhh!
Comment