Military Has Discharged 26 Gay Linguists

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CET
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2003
    • 2754

    #1

    Military Has Discharged 26 Gay Linguists

    This line really hit me hard.

    "The military is placing homophobia well ahead of national security,"

    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...tary_linguists

    What do you think?
    Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

    Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

    "Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
  • sharpx9
    Registered User
    • Sep 2004
    • 2085

    #2
    Homosexuals are gay.

    Comment

    • BRISK
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Feb 2003
      • 12240

      #3
      Land of the Free
      I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
      I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

      Comment

      • Joe Citizen
        Confirmed User
        • Oct 2003
        • 4552

        #4
        I think that anything that helps turn this war into a neverending nightmare for the Bush administraion is a good thing.

        On a side note, I think that gays should be allowed to serve in the military. Homosexuals should not be denied the right to volunteer to be fresh meat for the capitalist system.

        Comment

        • erehwon
          Confirmed User
          • Nov 2003
          • 3759

          #5
          Jeez, I can't fucking belive this country in at times, we're at war and they are more concerned with who their translators are sleeping with.

          Someone should remind them if this "Don't ask, don't tell" policy was in place during WWII, we might either still be at war, or I'd be typing this in german as many of the top cryptographers at the time were gay.

          Money NEVER $leep$...

          Comment

          • Sarah_Jayne
            Now with more Jayne
            • Dec 2002
            • 40077

            #6
            wonder who will liberate them

            Comment

            • Rui
              web
              • Dec 2001
              • 9533

              #7
              Maybe they wanted their hetero soldiers to be safe in the barracks also? ROFL

              Comment

              • theking
                Nice Kitty
                • Sep 2002
                • 21053

                #8
                Originally posted by Joe Citizen
                I think that anything that helps turn this war into a neverending nightmare for the Bush administraion is a good thing.

                On a side note, I think that gays should be allowed to serve in the military. Homosexuals should not be denied the right to volunteer to be fresh meat for the capitalist system.

                Homosexuals are allowed to serve in the military. They are made aware that they cannot announce the fact that they are homosexual and they are made aware that they cannot engage in homosexual conduct...during their term of enlistment. Some of them simply do not have enough self control to abide by the regulations for the two-six years of their initial enlistment or do not want to fulfill their contractual military obligation...thus they violate the regulations. They...like all soldiers...must follow regulations or they are subject to pay consequences for their disobedience of regulations.
                When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                Comment

                • theking
                  Nice Kitty
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 21053

                  #9
                  Originally posted by CET
                  This line really hit me hard.

                  "The military is placing homophobia well ahead of national security,"

                  http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...tary_linguists

                  What do you think?
                  The military is not placing homophobia ahead of national security. The military is applying obedience to regualtions...for all of its personell...and homosexuals are not excluded from obedience to regulations...nor are those personell with select MOS's.
                  Last edited by theking; 01-15-2005, 05:54 AM.
                  When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                  FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                  Comment

                  • Nysus
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2001
                    • 7817

                    #10
                    Originally posted by theking
                    Homosexuals are allowed to serve in the military. They are made aware that they cannot announce the fact that they are homosexual and they are made aware that they cannot engage in homosexual conduct...during their term of enlistment. Some of them simply do not have enough self control to abide by the regulations for the two-six years of their initial enlistment or do not want to fulfill their contractual military obligation...thus they violate the regulations. They...like all soldiers...must follow regulations or they are subject to pay consequences for their disobedience of regulations.
                    So straight guys don't sleep with 1 or more women? It's hypocritical. A limitation to a soldier stating that their conduct can't interfere with/or be on military property, but you shouldn't say specifically "homosexual conduct" ...

                    Matt
                    What name is pr0 / Untouched Markets using these days? Untouched Markets - pr0 - Refund My Money Now

                    Someone owes me $2,000 because they didn't do any work that was paid for *pointing at pr0 / William / UntouchedMarkets*

                    See http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?p=16744521 and for more detailed see http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=948645

                    Comment

                    • theking
                      Nice Kitty
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 21053

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Nysus
                      So straight guys don't sleep with 1 or more women? It's hypocritical. A limitation to a soldier stating that their conduct can't interfere with/or be on military property, but you shouldn't say specifically "homosexual conduct" ...

                      Matt
                      Call it "hypocritical" or whatever you want to call it. The military made this descision many years ago...it is regulation...and all soldiers are required to obey regulations. Homosexuals are not required to serve in the military...they volunteer for the military...and are made aware of the regulations. When they choose to violate the regulations they are discharged...end of story.
                      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                      Comment

                      • QuaWee
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2004
                        • 5791

                        #12
                        I still do not understand why homosexuals are banned from the army
                        i luv mainstream

                        Comment

                        • DirtyGold-Doug
                          Registered User
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 62

                          #13
                          I don't think butch lesbians are banned from the military, in fact I think they like them, cause the're so tough!

                          Gay linguists... probably all talked with a lisp, that's really why they got fired, if you're a linguist, you just can't talk with a lisp
                          SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.

                          Comment

                          • Tala
                            Fucked if I know
                            • Dec 2002
                            • 23368

                            #14
                            Originally posted by theking
                            Homosexuals are allowed to serve in the military. They are made aware that they cannot announce the fact that they are homosexual and they are made aware that they cannot engage in homosexual conduct...during their term of enlistment. Some of them simply do not have enough self control to abide by the regulations for the two-six years of their initial enlistment or do not want to fulfill their contractual military obligation...thus they violate the regulations. They...like all soldiers...must follow regulations or they are subject to pay consequences for their disobedience of regulations.
                            Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

                            Explain to me, then, why it is written in the regulations that any sexual intercourse other than "missionary position" is illegal as well for soldiers "during their term of enlistment", (or any uniformed member of the US armed forces), and yet no one gets called on that one?
                            __________________________________________________ ______________

                            10 U.S.C. 925 (2002). According to the explanation provided in the Military Manual for Courts Martial:

                            It is unnatural carnal copulation for a person to take into that person's mouth or anus the sexual organ of another person or of an animal; or to place that person's sexual organ in the mouth or anus of another person or of an animal; or to have carnal copulation in any opening of the body, except the sexual parts, with another person; or to have carnal copulation with an animal.

                            U.S. Department of Defense, Manual for Courts-Martial, 1998, 51(c).

                            __________________________________________________ _____________

                            Ever hear of a straight man or woman getting court martialed for a blowjob or anal sex, (without other extrenuating circumstances, i.e., "Corps whores", promotions, fraternization, etc. between heterosexuals)?

                            If you think that the US military isn't homophobic, you're out of your mind. Anything they can get against you will be used against you, especially if you're gay. Why the hell do you think the damn sodomy laws are in place?

                            Basically what the USAFs are saying is, "Yeah, you're gay. You can fight, you can die, you can drink, but you can't get laid."

                            ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.

                            Comment

                            • DaddyHalbucks
                              A freakin' legend!
                              • Feb 2004
                              • 18975

                              #15
                              I guess they weren't very CUNNING linguists..
                              Boner Money

                              Comment

                              • Tala
                                Fucked if I know
                                • Dec 2002
                                • 23368

                                #16
                                Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks
                                I guess they weren't very CUNNING linguists..
                                Thanks, Tom.

                                ICQ: 11120676 | Google: mindcrime | Skype: suitemindcrime|E-Mail: mindcrime AT gmail.com|PR girl with great writing skills for hire!!!! Contact me to work for YOU!|TECHIEMEDIA? 24/7 support from some of the best techs in the biz. Tell Jim that I sent you.

                                Comment

                                • BRISK
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Feb 2003
                                  • 12240

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by QuaWee
                                  I still do not understand why homosexuals are banned from the army
                                  America loves God

                                  God hates gays

                                  Therefore, America hates gays


                                  It's ok to have discrimination as long as the moral majority support it

                                  Praise Allah!
                                  I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
                                  I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

                                  Comment

                                  • colpanic
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • May 2004
                                    • 1007

                                    #18
                                    I think that they should let the lesbians stay.

                                    I heard that they are cunning-linguists.



                                    (I kill me)
                                    I like ducks.

                                    Comment

                                    • mardigras
                                      Bon temps!
                                      • Feb 2003
                                      • 14194

                                      #19
                                      I'm with theking. Who cares if a terrorist act happens because there wasn't someone to translate some critical information as long as the military can uphold it's ironclad policy of discrimination
                                      .

                                      Comment

                                      • theking
                                        Nice Kitty
                                        • Sep 2002
                                        • 21053

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Tala
                                        Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

                                        Explain to me, then, why it is written in the regulations that any sexual intercourse other than "missionary position" is illegal as well for soldiers "during their term of enlistment", (or any uniformed member of the US armed forces), and yet no one gets called on that one?
                                        __________________________________________________ ______________

                                        10 U.S.C. 925 (2002). According to the explanation provided in the Military Manual for Courts Martial:

                                        It is unnatural carnal copulation for a person to take into that person's mouth or anus the sexual organ of another person or of an animal; or to place that person's sexual organ in the mouth or anus of another person or of an animal; or to have carnal copulation in any opening of the body, except the sexual parts, with another person; or to have carnal copulation with an animal.

                                        U.S. Department of Defense, Manual for Courts-Martial, 1998, 51(c).

                                        __________________________________________________ _____________

                                        Ever hear of a straight man or woman getting court martialed for a blowjob or anal sex, (without other extrenuating circumstances, i.e., "Corps whores", promotions, fraternization, etc. between heterosexuals)?

                                        If you think that the US military isn't homophobic, you're out of your mind. Anything they can get against you will be used against you, especially if you're gay. Why the hell do you think the damn sodomy laws are in place?

                                        Basically what the USAFs are saying is, "Yeah, you're gay. You can fight, you can die, you can drink, but you can't get laid."
                                        It is not written "in the regulations that any sexual intercourse other than "missionary position" is illegal."

                                        Basically "what the USAF's are saying is"...all soldiers must obey regulation...irregardless of MOS...and irregardless of your personell approval...or lack there of...of a particular regulation.

                                        The same applies in the civilian world...one is required to obey law...irregardless of ones personal approval...or lack there of...of a particular law.
                                        When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                        FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                        Comment

                                        • baddog
                                          So Fucking Banned
                                          • Apr 2001
                                          • 107089

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by erehwon
                                          Someone should remind them if this "Don't ask, don't tell" policy was in place during WWII, we might either still be at war, or I'd be typing this in german as many of the top cryptographers at the time were gay.


                                          How do you know that?

                                          Comment

                                          • pxxx
                                            First African GFY Member
                                            • Mar 2004
                                            • 12114

                                            #22
                                            i dont think that is a good idea.

                                            Comment

                                            • baddog
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Apr 2001
                                              • 107089

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by theking
                                              Some of them simply . . . do not want to fulfill their contractual military obligation....

                                              Most likely the case.

                                              Comment

                                              • baddog
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Apr 2001
                                                • 107089

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Tala
                                                Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

                                                Explain to me, then, why it is written in the regulations that any sexual intercourse other than "missionary position" is illegal as well for soldiers "during their term of enlistment", (or any uniformed member of the US armed forces), and yet no one gets called on that one?

                                                Because straight guys don't feel the need to describe their sexual encounters to their superiors?

                                                Don't ask, don't tell applies to more than just homosexuals.

                                                Comment

                                                • theking
                                                  Nice Kitty
                                                  • Sep 2002
                                                  • 21053

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by erehwon
                                                  Jeez, I can't fucking belive this country in at times, we're at war and they are more concerned with who their translators are sleeping with.

                                                  Someone should remind them if this "Don't ask, don't tell" policy was in place during WWII, we might either still be at war, or I'd be typing this in german as many of the top cryptographers at the time were gay.

                                                  Maybe you should be reminded that the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy is a relatively new policy. During the 2nd World War...they did ask and if you stated that you were a homosexual you would be denied the previlige of serving in the military...thus serving their country. The "don't ask, don't tell" allows homosexuals the previlige of serving in the military...thus serving their country.

                                                  Thanks BadDog...I had over looked this post.
                                                  When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                  FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                  Comment

                                                  Working...