Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Heywood Jablome
The Clinton administration was notably weak on online CP prosecutions, instead they gave us the 2257 law.
If the gov't deserves blame when things go wrong, then certainly they should deserve credit when they do right.
As an adult webmaster, I applaud the Bush administration's efforts to curb CP and regulate spam, and for working with us through the FSC to hammer out a reasonable version of 2257.
|
What has this got to do with Clinton or Bush??
Ask any "pedo chaser" and they will tell ya their top concern in enabling them to do their job is lack of funding. Tho not all, the main reason politicians get involved in CP is to save their sorry asses and gain popularity.
The day a US Admin actually addresses the issue of US citizens committing offenses against children in other countries and agrees to hand over bodies for trial in these countries - is the day I'll give them credit.
The last and first instance of that actually happening took over two years of work and pressuring by two guys, cumulating in threats of embarassment internationally unless they did hand over a US citizen. Of course they gave in on the 11th hour and the perp was eventually convicted and jailed abroad.
Since when was the US govt "working with us through the FSC"?
The US govt don't give a fuck about "us" - they have their own agenda and incase you never noticed, - are currently working on another angle to over-ride their court problems concerning 2257.