Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
ouch i thought they were on a different angle im not sure i support this
They are saying a guy who gets a chick prego can say "either you get an abortion or i get to sign off on any financial obligation now"
theres 2 people that create an unplanned pregnancy. not just the woman , the mistake was not using a condom , not "not getting an abortion"
|
Oh right, I think they meant more of if they both agree it was an unplanned pregnancy the father can opt out of the financial responsibility...
If the mother can't support it she could give it up for adopotion if she doesn't want to go the abortion route.
Look at that guys case, his ex-gf said she had a physical impairment that wouldn't allow her to get pregnant... now she says she's prego and wants to keep it and is gonna jack him for child support. Thats going to have a big effect on that guys life and its not fair to him at all.
Even if they don't go the route of letting the guy opt out of financial responsibility maybe they can do something else like a lower responsibility... tax breaks on money given... something besides just stealing $ from his pocket
afterall it takes 2 and BOTH parties have equal (if not better options for the female) contraceptives
there are a good amount (not all) of women that do things like lie about being on birth control, etc because they know they can get $ from the father... the good ol 'keep a nigga' baby