Of we are not going to really help they dont have oil
America's lack of solidarity to the tsunami victims is trully appaling
Collapse
X
-
December 30, 2004
EDITORIAL
Are We Stingy? Yes
President Bush finally roused himself yesterday from his vacation in
Crawford, Tex., to telephone his sympathy to the leaders of India, Sri
Lanka, Thailand and Indonesia, and to speak publicly about the
devastation of Sunday's tsunamis in Asia. He also hurried to put as
much distance as possible between himself and America's initial measly
aid offer of $15 million, and he took issue with an earlier statement
by the United Nations' emergency relief coordinator, Jan Egeland, who
had called the overall aid efforts by rich Western nations "stingy."
"The person who made that statement was very misguided and ill
informed," the president said.
We beg to differ. Mr. Egeland was right on target. We hope Secretary
of State Colin Powell was privately embarrassed when, two days into a
catastrophic disaster that hit 12 of the world's poorer countries and
will cost billions of dollars to meliorate, he held a press conference
to say that America, the world's richest nation, would contribute $15
million. That's less than half of what Republicans plan to spend on
the Bush inaugural festivities.
The American aid figure for the current disaster is now $35 million,
and we applaud Mr. Bush's turnaround. But $35 million remains a
miserly drop in the bucket, and is in keeping with the pitiful amount
of the United States budget that we allocate for nonmilitary foreign
aid. According to a poll, most Americans believe the United States
spends 24 percent of its budget on aid to poor countries; it actually
spends well under a quarter of 1 percent.
Bush administration officials help create that perception gap. Fuming
at the charge of stinginess, Mr. Powell pointed to disaster relief and
said the United States "has given more aid in the last four years than
any other nation or combination of nations in the world." But for
development aid, America gave $16.2 billion in 2003; the European
Union gave $37.1 billion. In 2002, those numbers were $13.2 billion
for America, and $29.9 billion for Europe.
Making things worse, we often pledge more money than we actually
deliver. Victims of the earthquake in Bam, Iran, a year ago are still
living in tents because aid, including ours, has not materialized in
the amounts pledged. And back in 2002, Mr. Bush announced his
Millennium Challenge account to give African countries development
assistance of up to $5 billion a year, but the account has yet to
disperse a single dollar.
Mr. Bush said yesterday that the $35 million we've now pledged "is
only the beginning" of the United States' recovery effort. Let's hope
that is true, and that this time, our actions will match our promises.Comment
-
dude, didn't you see the day after tomorrow? those other fucking 'countries' wouldn't help us either.Originally posted by Shaddam IVAre we finally seeing the real Modern America's ugly fat face?
and if you can't see i'm kidding you should go shoot yourselfComment
-
They live in tents because they are Nomads.. The fucking nation is oil rich... Tell their own leaders to buy them a fucking house.Originally posted by tony404Making things worse, we often pledge more money than we actually
deliver. Victims of the earthquake in Bam, Iran, a year ago are still
living in tents because aid, including ours, has not materialized in
the amounts pledged. And back in 2002, Mr. Bush announced his
Millennium Challenge account to give African countries development
assistance of up to $5 billion a year, but the account has yet to
disperse a single dollar.Comment
-
Originally posted by pornguyWTF people, US said they were donating, but it will take a while. I think they should've sent rescue teams in the meantime, but...
we sent 2 aircraft carriers thats 10,000 sailors and marinesComment
-
EDITORIAL...care to post the link and author's name? Might make your post conviencingOriginally posted by tony404December 30, 2004
EDITORIAL
Are We Stingy? Yes
President Bush finally roused himself yesterday from his vacation in
Crawford, Tex., to telephone his sympathy to the leaders of India, Sri
Lanka, Thailand and Indonesia, and to speak publicly about the
devastation of Sunday's tsunamis in Asia. He also hurried to put as
much distance as possible between himself and America's initial measly
aid offer of $15 million, and he took issue with an earlier statement
by the United Nations' emergency relief coordinator, Jan Egeland, who
had called the overall aid efforts by rich Western nations "stingy."
"The person who made that statement was very misguided and ill
informed," the president said.
We beg to differ. Mr. Egeland was right on target. We hope Secretary
of State Colin Powell was privately embarrassed when, two days into a
catastrophic disaster that hit 12 of the world's poorer countries and
will cost billions of dollars to meliorate, he held a press conference
to say that America, the world's richest nation, would contribute $15
million. That's less than half of what Republicans plan to spend on
the Bush inaugural festivities.
The American aid figure for the current disaster is now $35 million,
and we applaud Mr. Bush's turnaround. But $35 million remains a
miserly drop in the bucket, and is in keeping with the pitiful amount
of the United States budget that we allocate for nonmilitary foreign
aid. According to a poll, most Americans believe the United States
spends 24 percent of its budget on aid to poor countries; it actually
spends well under a quarter of 1 percent.
Bush administration officials help create that perception gap. Fuming
at the charge of stinginess, Mr. Powell pointed to disaster relief and
said the United States "has given more aid in the last four years than
any other nation or combination of nations in the world." But for
development aid, America gave $16.2 billion in 2003; the European
Union gave $37.1 billion. In 2002, those numbers were $13.2 billion
for America, and $29.9 billion for Europe.
Making things worse, we often pledge more money than we actually
deliver. Victims of the earthquake in Bam, Iran, a year ago are still
living in tents because aid, including ours, has not materialized in
the amounts pledged. And back in 2002, Mr. Bush announced his
Millennium Challenge account to give African countries development
assistance of up to $5 billion a year, but the account has yet to
disperse a single dollar.
Mr. Bush said yesterday that the $35 million we've now pledged "is
only the beginning" of the United States' recovery effort. Let's hope
that is true, and that this time, our actions will match our promises.
Comment
-
President FINALLY makes a statement about the tsunami. Interesting read:
"Long have I taken every opportunity to lead the fight against Terra, beating the earth into submissive at every step of the ride." The President was quoted as saying. "Now, it has been come clear that radical fringe groups like Greenpeace and Trader Joe's have been a mere smoke signal hiding the nefarious activities of Mother Nature, including terrah-fying weapons of mass destruction such as the punani responsible for killing tens of thousands of godless, non-American orientals. My driver informs me, however, that they are still technically humans. Only by embarking on a global antiearth campaign can we ever hope to quell these senseless acts of terror against america and even the commies too. Already in this first term, by the grace of god we have destroyed millions of acres of forest, and our commitment is to destroy all forests by the year 2010 as an opening shot in this new war on terra."
The three point Bush plan to stop terra forever has stirred up a fair amount of controversy with environmental groups and democratic leadership, and even the NWACP, an African American civil liberties group not yet shut down by investigations by the IRS seeking to take away its nonprofit status due to criticizing the president in unamerican fashion.
Skeptics in the democratic party feel that building a giant laser on the moon aimed at the earth could increase the national deficit. "Yes it's true." one source commented. "A gigantic laser capable of blowing up the earth could well cost thousands or even billions of dollars, take years to build, or even increase the national deficit slightly. The democratic party recognizes the danger posed by terra, but we feel it is something you just have to tighten security against and be prepared to deal with once in a while. Don't let anyone think we aren't soft on terra, though - we have caved in dozens of times on important environmental issues when it was popular or netted us a good enough kickback!"
Unfortunately Greenpeace representatives could not be reached for comment, as they have been permanently detained in Guantanamo Bay under the new Patriot Act; however we were able to reach NWACP spokesman Flava Flav.
"Wake up, Washington! Know what time it is? We got money for a moon laser, but you can't get a decent meal program for schools in the hood!" he said. "Let me guess - once we get to the moon all the brothers are gonna have to live on the Dark Side, right? This is just another ploy to keep the black man down!" he screamed as secret service personnel carted him away.Comment
-
It's been uncalled for for a while now. At first I could kind of see what the some of the Europeans think of us and listen to their complaints, but now it's pretty obvious that some are totally jaded beyond understanding.Originally posted by .?.All this America-bashing is uncalled for.
Comment


Comment