Thought I'd rub it in...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crowkid
    o.g. spammer
    • Jan 2003
    • 1240

    #1

    Thought I'd rub it in...

    Canadians, I trust you will enjoy this the most! Take that Lensman! What??!? what?!?!? what?!??!?!

    rofl




    my pres fucking ownz, not only does he piss off all you silly canucks, he gets Person of the Year for the 2nd time!!! life is good fellas, life is good.
  • TurboTrucker
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2003
    • 2363

    #2
    They should have used the picture of him made from all the dead soldiers.

    Comment

    • Manowar
      jellyfish  
      • Dec 2003
      • 71528

      #3

      Comment

      • machinegunkelly
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2003
        • 3304

        #4
        Just shows how ignorant alot of americans are .
        dead.

        Comment

        • crowkid
          o.g. spammer
          • Jan 2003
          • 1240

          #5
          Originally posted by TurboTrucker
          They should have used the picture of him made from all the dead soldiers.
          Why would Time Magazine use something one of your hippie buddies on the internet came up with? I'm sure they've got some designers, they've got it taken care of buddy..But Time thanks you for the suggestion!

          Comment

          • Carol@Pixipay
            I have traffic for sale
            • Aug 2002
            • 1118

            #6
            I caught it on the news this morning and they were mentioning that it had nothing to do with how "wonderful" he is, more of a "who created the most news" kinda thing. (That was my impression)

            In any case, more evidence that Playboy has better articles then most of the mainstream bullshit out there!

            Comment

            • titmowse
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2001
              • 5320

              #7
              Hitler, Stalin and the Ayatollah Khomeini were Time's "Person of the Year".

              Here's what the Time site said about Bush when the page first went up:

              "For sharpening the debate until the choices bled, for reframing reality to match his design, for gambling his fortunes?and ours?on his faith in the power of leadership, George W. Bush is TIME's 2004 Person of the Year. "

              Now it says:

              "For sticking to his guns (literally and figuratively), for reshaping the rules of politics to fit his ten-gallon-hat leadership style and for persuading a majority of voters that he deserved to be in the White House for another four years, George W. Bush is TIME's 2004 Person of the Year."

              The 'nice' version is no compliment.
              I still love everybody

              Comment

              • tony299
                lurker
                • Aug 2002
                • 57021

                #8
                Originally posted by titmowse
                Hitler, Stalin and the Ayatollah Khomeini were Time's "Person of the Year".

                Here's what the Time site said about Bush when the page first went up:

                "For sharpening the debate until the choices bled, for reframing reality to match his design, for gambling his fortunes?and ours?on his faith in the power of leadership, George W. Bush is TIME's 2004 Person of the Year. "

                Now it says:

                "For sticking to his guns (literally and figuratively), for reshaping the rules of politics to fit his ten-gallon-hat leadership style and for persuading a majority of voters that he deserved to be in the White House for another four years, George W. Bush is TIME's 2004 Person of the Year."

                The 'nice' version is no compliment.
                very true

                Comment

                • crowkid
                  o.g. spammer
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 1240

                  #9
                  Originally posted by tony404
                  very true

                  Comment

                  • Screaming
                    I can change this!!!!!
                    • Feb 2004
                    • 18972

                    #10
                    not another bush thread

                    Comment

                    • Freakster
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 833

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Screaming
                      not another bush thread
                      yup!
                      174-38-56

                      Comment

                      • reynold
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Oct 2002
                        • 51271

                        #12
                        another bush grabbing attention

                        Comment

                        Working...