Supreme court says cops don't have to tell you why they are arresting you.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • - Jesus Christ -
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2003
    • 7197

    #1

    Supreme court says cops don't have to tell you why they are arresting you.

    http://courttv.com/news/2004/1213/arrests_ap.html

    "A predictable consequence ... is not ... that officers will cease making sham arrests on the hope that such arrests will later be validated, but rather that officers will cease providing reasons for arrest," Scalia wrote.

    Amen
  • Manowar
    jellyfish  
    • Dec 2003
    • 71528

    #2
    1984 will soon be classed as a non-fiction book

    Comment

    • XxXotic
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2002
      • 8500

      #3
      Oxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013

      Comment

      • directfiesta
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Oct 2002
        • 30184

        #4
        Originally posted by Manowar
        1984 will soon be classed as a non-fiction book
        like next year ...
        I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

        But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

        Comment

        • - Jesus Christ -
          Confirmed User
          • Mar 2003
          • 7197

          #5
          no, no, and no.


          Next....

          Amen

          Comment

          • theking
            Nice Kitty
            • Sep 2002
            • 21053

            #6
            It is a State law and the State law was upheld...and FYI many states have the same/similar law...and have had for many years.

            A person that has been arrested does not have a need to know...from the arresting officer...what he/she is being arrested for. When you are booked you will receive a copy of the booking...and/or your bonds person will... and/or you will at arraignment. Basically...it is a non issue.
            When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

            FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

            Comment

            • - Jesus Christ -
              Confirmed User
              • Mar 2003
              • 7197

              #7
              Originally posted by theking
              It is a State law and the State law was upheld...and FYI many states have the same/similar law...and have had for many years.

              A person that has been arrested does not have a need to know...from the arresting officer...what he/she is being arrested for. When you are booked you will receive a copy of the booking...and/or your bonds person will... and/or you will at arraignment. Basically...it is a non issue.
              UH its a good thing you somehow magically know the details of the case and what the booking documentation was.

              and it was such a "non-issue" the supreme court heard arguments and ruled on it.


              Amen

              Comment

              • tony299
                lurker
                • Aug 2002
                • 57021

                #8
                Thats very fucked up

                Comment

                • - Jesus Christ -
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 7197

                  #9
                  And if you buy the bullshit scalia is selling in that article I have some swamp land you may be interested in.

                  Such as this...

                  "Scalia also noted that a ruling to the contrary would deter officers from providing reasons for their arrest, as they did in Alford's case,"


                  Wich is complete and utter bullshit.

                  A ruling to the contrary would have detered them from filing charges that will eventually fall though so they can detain you long enough to set up new charges.

                  Amen

                  Comment

                  • chemicaleyes
                    UNSTOPPABLE
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 11569

                    #10
                    Originally posted by theking
                    It is a State law and the State law was upheld...and FYI many states have the same/similar law...and have had for many years.

                    A person that has been arrested does not have a need to know...from the arresting officer...what he/she is being arrested for. When you are booked you will receive a copy of the booking...and/or your bonds person will... and/or you will at arraignment. Basically...it is a non issue.
                    You're a joke
                    No way as way, No limitation as limitation. AmeriNOC formally PhatServers

                    Comment

                    • theking
                      Nice Kitty
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 21053

                      #11
                      Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                      UH its a good thing you somehow magically know the details of the case and what the booking documentation was.

                      and it was such a "non-issue" the supreme court heard arguments and ruled on it.

                      Re-read my post. It is basically a non-issue if the arresting officer informs you of what he/she is arresting you for...as you will learn what you are being arrested for...as I explained...and is SOP for officers in many states.
                      Last edited by theking; 12-16-2004, 02:33 PM.
                      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                      Comment

                      • - Jesus Christ -
                        Confirmed User
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 7197

                        #12
                        Originally posted by theking
                        Re-read my post. It is basically a non-issue if the arresting officer informs you of what he/she is arresting you for...as you will learn what you are being arrested for...as I explained...and is SOP for officers in many states.
                        I don't have to reread it. I already read it once and rebuted it then had a good laugh at you.

                        Amen

                        Comment

                        • theking
                          Nice Kitty
                          • Sep 2002
                          • 21053

                          #13
                          Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                          And if you buy the bullshit scalia is selling in that article I have some swamp land you may be interested in.

                          Such as this...

                          "Scalia also noted that a ruling to the contrary would deter officers from providing reasons for their arrest, as they did in Alford's case,"


                          Wich is complete and utter bullshit.

                          A ruling to the contrary would have detered them from filing charges that will eventually fall though so they can detain you long enough to set up new charges.
                          It would not necessarily have deterred the arrest...as they could have just as easily arrested him for "impersonating an officer" (this was there secondary reason for the arrest) and under State Law the arresting officers are not required to tell him what he is being arrested for.
                          When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                          FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                          Comment

                          • theking
                            Nice Kitty
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 21053

                            #14
                            Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                            I don't have to reread it. I already read it once and rebuted it then had a good laugh at you.
                            You did not rebut anything in my post...zero...nada.
                            When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                            FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                            Comment

                            • - Jesus Christ -
                              Confirmed User
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 7197

                              #15
                              Originally posted by theking
                              It would not necessarily have deterred the arrest...as they could have just as easily arrested him for "impersonating an officer" (this was there secondary reason for the arrest) and under State Law the arresting officers are not required to tell him what he is being arrested for.
                              Its not about HIS case, its about the fact that a federal court made a ruling that can be pointed at in all other courts....

                              If you cant see how this can be abused your pretty slow in the head.

                              Originally posted by theking
                              You did not rebut anything in my post...zero...nada.
                              Yea I did.... the smiley was all that was needed to rebut that bullshit for anyone with a half a brain and some knowledge of how supreme court rulings are used and abused.
                              Last edited by - Jesus Christ -; 12-16-2004, 02:45 PM.

                              Amen

                              Comment

                              • theking
                                Nice Kitty
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 21053

                                #16
                                Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                                Its not about HIS case, its about the fact that a federal court made a ruling that can be pointed at in all other courts....

                                If you cant see how this can be abused your pretty slow in the head.


                                Yea I did.... the smiley was all that was needed to rebut that bullshit for anyone with a half a brain and some knowledge of how supreme court rulings are used and abused.
                                I will repeat...many states and maybe even most states...arresting officers are not required to inform you of the reason that you are being arrested. Even if an arresting officer provides you with reason A...when they book you they can add reasons B-C-D etc. In addition it is really immaterial what reason an arresting officer provides you...if they choose to provide you with a reason...as it is not they that charge you...it is the DA's office that levies charges and the DA may add to or subtract from whatever the arresting officers arrested you for.
                                When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                Comment

                                • - Jesus Christ -
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Mar 2003
                                  • 7197

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by theking
                                  I will repeat...many states and maybe even most states...arresting officers are not required to inform you of the reason that you are being arrested. Even if an arresting officer provides you with reason A...when they book you they can add reasons B-C-D etc. In addition it is really immaterial what reason an arresting officer provides you...if they choose to provide you with a reason...as it is not they that charge you...it is the DA's office that levies charges and the DA may add to or subtract from whatever the arresting officers arrested you for.
                                  Keyword being states.


                                  God your thick.

                                  Amen

                                  Comment

                                  • sean416
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Feb 2004
                                    • 3633

                                    #18
                                    yaaay another pissing contest on gfy.

                                    ServerProvider.com

                                    Comment

                                    • theking
                                      Nice Kitty
                                      • Sep 2002
                                      • 21053

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                                      Keyword being states.


                                      God your thick.
                                      I assume that you are aware that this was a State Case that was challenged in the Federal Courts...so yes the keyword is "states".
                                      When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                      FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                      Comment

                                      • directfiesta
                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                        • Oct 2002
                                        • 30184

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                                        Keyword being states.


                                        God your thick.
                                        Invoking your father ???

                                        Give up. TheKing is always right...

                                        Post from TheKing:

                                        " I repeat" , "re-read my post" , " as I previously stated ", and so on ....
                                        I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                        But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                        Comment

                                        • - Jesus Christ -
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Mar 2003
                                          • 7197

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by theking
                                          I assume that you are aware that this was a State Case that was challenged in the Federal Courts...so yes the keyword is "states".
                                          Must be wonderfull to live in a fantasy world where the supreme courts ruling on a state case only effects that state.

                                          Amen

                                          Comment

                                          • Brown Bear
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • May 2002
                                            • 4982

                                            #22
                                            You are all dismissed!!!!
                                            Surrender all your independent thinking and Click Here for re-programming.

                                            Comment

                                            • The Bootyologist
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Jun 2004
                                              • 2912

                                              #23
                                              this is insane i hate what america is coming to

                                              Comment

                                              • directfiesta
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Oct 2002
                                                • 30184

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Brown Bear
                                                You are all dismissed!!!!
                                                LOL !!!!



                                                I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                Comment

                                                • theking
                                                  Nice Kitty
                                                  • Sep 2002
                                                  • 21053

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                                                  Must be wonderfull to live in a fantasy world where the supreme courts ruling on a state case only effects that state.
                                                  What fucking difference does it make what states it affects. The fact is...it is a non-issue...if an arresting officer provides you with a reason for the arrest...or doesn't provide you with a reason for the arrest.
                                                  Last edited by theking; 12-16-2004, 03:08 PM.
                                                  When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                  FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                  Comment

                                                  • theking
                                                    Nice Kitty
                                                    • Sep 2002
                                                    • 21053

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by The Bootyologist
                                                    this is insane i hate what america is coming to
                                                    This ruling does not affect what America is coming to...as this has been SOP for the police for many, many years.
                                                    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                    Comment

                                                    • - Jesus Christ -
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Mar 2003
                                                      • 7197

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by theking
                                                      What fucking difference does it make what states it effects. The fact is...it is a non-issue...if an arresting officer provides you with a reason for the arrest...or doesn't provide you with a reason for the arrest.
                                                      The being told is a non-issue.

                                                      THE RULING IS AN ISSUE....

                                                      Notice the thread is "Supreme court says..." not "State laws say..."

                                                      This is not the same thing as Upholding a state law.

                                                      (This is like talking to a wall. Except less fun.)

                                                      Amen

                                                      Comment

                                                      • theking
                                                        Nice Kitty
                                                        • Sep 2002
                                                        • 21053

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                                                        The being told is a non-issue.

                                                        THE RULING IS AN ISSUE....

                                                        Notice the thread is "Supreme court says..." not "State laws say..."

                                                        This is not the same thing as Upholding a state law.

                                                        (This is like talking to a wall. Except less fun.)
                                                        KISS...and explain to me why you place importance upon an arresting officer...providing a reason for the arrest.

                                                        For many years arresting officers have not provided a reason to the arrestee for an arrest (unless they chose to) and this ruling just affirms that they do not have to.
                                                        Last edited by theking; 12-16-2004, 03:21 PM.
                                                        When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                        FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                        Comment

                                                        • - Jesus Christ -
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Mar 2003
                                                          • 7197

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by theking
                                                          KISS...and explain to me why you place importance upon an arresting officer...providing a reason for the arrest.
                                                          You don't understand the court system. Please go read about it becasue you're really getting on my nerves. This thread was never ment to be about cops not telling you shit. Its about the SUPREME COURT ruling on that issue.

                                                          Theres a big difference between a state law and a supreme court ruling on a state law. You don't seem to grasp that concept and keep trying to keep the argument on what cops do in specific states.


                                                          It affirms somthing lots of poeple DON'T agree with.
                                                          Thats the fucking point. Not weather or not cops were already doing it.

                                                          You are trying to argue a point IM NOT ARGUING ABOUT and I guess you keep doing it to save face or somthing... but I'm done responding to it.

                                                          Amen

                                                          Comment

                                                          • NichePay_Manny
                                                            Registered User
                                                            • Jul 2004
                                                            • 1833

                                                            #30
                                                            We are fucked

                                                            Comment

                                                            • theking
                                                              Nice Kitty
                                                              • Sep 2002
                                                              • 21053

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by - Jesus Christ -
                                                              You don't understand the court system. Please go read about it becasue you're really getting on my nerves. This thread was never ment to be about cops not telling you shit. Its about the SUPREME COURT ruling on that issue.

                                                              Theres a big difference between a state law and a supreme court ruling on a state law. You don't seem to grasp that concept and keep trying to keep the argument on what cops do in specific states.


                                                              It affirms somthing lots of poeple DON'T agree with.
                                                              Thats the fucking point. Not weather or not cops were already doing it.

                                                              You are trying to argue a point IM NOT ARGUING ABOUT and I guess you keep doing it to save face or somthing... but I'm done responding to it.
                                                              Hmm...to remind you what the topic title is "Supreme court says cops don't have to tell you why they are arresting you."

                                                              It appears that I have been on point in all of my posts. Now...KISS...and exlain why you have a concern about an arresting officer not providing an arresttee with a reason for the arrest.
                                                              When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                              FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Bama
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Nov 2001
                                                                • 2727

                                                                #32
                                                                First it was the id marks a printer made when it was used, now this...

                                                                What exactly are you folks doing when not posting on GFY that this kind of stuff is a threat to you or your way of life?

                                                                Bad people need to be put away and if living in a free society means a few inconveinences for good people along the way - that's really not that high of a price to pay.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Jinx
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Feb 2002
                                                                  • 636

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by Bama
                                                                  First it was the id marks a printer made when it was used, now this...

                                                                  What exactly are you folks doing when not posting on GFY that this kind of stuff is a threat to you or your way of life?

                                                                  Bad people need to be put away and if living in a free society means a few inconveinences for good people along the way - that's really not that high of a price to pay.
                                                                  I agree as long as it's only a few inconveniences, but what if it gets worse?


                                                                  ICQ: 360-63-200

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • jimmyf
                                                                    OU812
                                                                    • Feb 2001
                                                                    • 12651

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by theking
                                                                    This ruling does not affect what America is coming to...as this has been SOP for the police for many, many years.

                                                                    I know this and have for a loooooooong time, and see you do also..... but you have a few on this board believe what they want 2 believe, or interpret things in such way 2 fit there agenda
                                                                    Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
                                                                    Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
                                                                    Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • UniversalPassLorence
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Dec 2004
                                                                      • 3721

                                                                      #35
                                                                      They are slowly taking aquaring more power, the problem is some of the cops will abuse it.


                                                                      $25.00 PPS for $1.00 Trial

                                                                      Making Webmasters Money Since 1997

                                                                      ICQ: 305090349

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • machinegunkelly
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Jun 2003
                                                                        • 3304

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by Bama
                                                                        Bad people need to be put away and if living in a free society means a few inconveinences for good people along the way - that's really not that high of a price to pay.

                                                                        yep , thats about what George W wants you to think .
                                                                        Im glad Im in canada ;)
                                                                        dead.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Honeyslut
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Jan 2001
                                                                          • 6436

                                                                          #37
                                                                          It does not matter what the Supreme court or constitution says. The local Judges will do the fuck what ever they want and you just have to spend the big bucks to stop them..

                                                                          http://nakedlunchnews.comWhat's up ? Naked Lunch News !

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Mr. Mike
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Aug 2004
                                                                            • 913

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Hmm, im moving somewhere sunny!

                                                                            Really tho, I never ever considered leaving the country, but lately, i have been thinking about it. Things like this just keep piling up. Before you know it we will have random home searches without warrants. I see it comming in the next 10 years.
                                                                            Sig for sale. ICQ: 163-545-054

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            Working...