Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
He said he sent them to epassporte , and they said they were "altered" , they wouldnt say they were "altered" if they hadn't seen them.. I think the onus is on epassporte to provide him with what is "altered". The pictures are up on several sites.. so obviously a contract exists in some fashion and there is a content provider that has a legal right to sell them no ? If epassporte's position is merely about 2257 then i can understand the problem.. just as any biller would.
|
i missed that in the thread - if that IS the case - it would be epassport's onus to show where the docs were altered.
if i bought altered 2257 docs from a content company i'd sure a fuck want to know about it. but i'd want proof too.
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|