Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

i dont think anyone was dissing lesley..

I'm pretty sure most people would agree its perfectly fine for a company to deny service to someone merely for personal reasons ( some dont , but for the most part we can all agree on that )

I think this fellow just felt a little insulted that they didnt just "TELL" him that it was for personal reasons and instead chose to accuse him or his content provider of altering documents..


Lets use a hypothetical situation.. If my wife or girlfriend or close employee , shot porn when she was younger or nude or bikini shots , and she regretted it , and at some point i had the option of using my influence to help her possibly remove some of the content , i would... , but i also wouldnt feel "slighted" that someone felt "gyped". Its either worth it or not worth it..

If i ran a bar and told people i didnt like, that they needed i.d. to get in so hey go home to get it and come back and then they did , and i told them their id was fake ( even though it wasnt ) after they went home to get it , i wouldnt feel slighted that they told my fellow bar patrons about getting shafted.

I think his point was that it probably could have benn handled in a much more professional way i.e. simply telling the truth .. ( hey i notice you have one of our employees on your site and she really regrets the pictures being presented in that fashion , can you help ? )