Epassporte account denied??

They were asked to show the model release, then remove her and call them to discuss they refused all 3 then they get upset because they got denied an account.

then all the haters come out and slam epass for protecting and employee i will never understand this biz fully LOL

this is one of many pages on the internet http://www.porneskimo.com/leslie%20kamarad.htm

if it was done to someone close to you would you just ignore it if you could possibly help

Enough already Rog...as you keep reminding everyone, we know that you once banged the bikini chick (says a lot about her morals, hehe - j/k), oh yeah, and half the other girls who ever spread Hawaiian Tropics on their bodies, but like you've posted the same shit over and over multiple times in this thread and in multiple others. Unless you have something new to add, kindly give it a rest...



All it sounds like to me is that you are either an attention whore, or you are trying to parlay your shining knight defense of Leslie into another jump on her bones (not that I wouldn't join you if you needed a wingman)...

ADG Webmaster

Thats what I am trying to figure out.

In one of the the other threads it seems that Dean shot alot of content for this dude named Chasin or somthing. Twissty's bought Dean and supposedly Twistys had no idea that Dean shot for Chasin or some shit.
Suposedly those contacts for Chasin were used to produce for Twistys or somthing...

But ultimatly Dean just started cappin on Epassport or somthing about a model wearing a bikini or some shit...
Then there was some attorney thing thrown down by Mallic in another thread.

Fuck this I am gettin another beer.
This shit dont make sense and does not involve me.

And apparently did, although later Chris Mallick claimed that the release had been altered. In that it is the site owner with whom Chris is refusing to do business and he didn't suggest any wrong-doing on the part of the content provider, he effectively implied that the site owner had made the changes.

We are all aware that ePassporte can choose to do business (or not) with anyone they want. But whether it is professional to exercise that choice depends on the circumstances and despite 5 pages of drama, those circumstances are still not clear.

Was the model release altered? If so, by whom? If it was altered by the owner(s) of bikinibabes.tv then certainly that is a dishonest business no-one should want to deal with. If the release was altered by the content provider and eP demonstrated that clearly to the owner(s) of bikinibabes, asking (as opposed to demanding) the pictures be removed, but ran into a brick wall, their refusal to do business was still marginally reasonable.

But in the very first post of this thread the site owner wrote "I... asked the content provider of the sets to contact Epassporte and the sort the mess out. I was 100% sure the content was ok to use - and even more sure a respectable content provider wouldn't forge legal documents just to sell a set lol. Well it turns out all the docs are correct and ok". If that was the truth and nothing has emerged in this thread to prove otherwise, then eP's decision, admirable as it may be to want to protect an employee/friend from their own foolishness, was very unprofessional, not least because it affects affiliates of the program, as well as its owner(s).

Okay, but what does it have to do with this thread? Even if we stay on topic I doubt we shall ever find out who has been telling us lies, so why confuse things further? It's already likely that while claiming to be defending a friend, since you have nothing more solid to contribute than anyone else here, you have kept the thread going twice as long as would otherwise have happened.

Dollars4babes have come to a decision. We are going to remove ALL pictures of Lesley from our Bikinibabes site.

This is NOT an admittance to any of Chris's allegations, but solely out of respect to the model. In no way have we promoted
Lesley as a Porn Star. Inevitably some of our affiliates have linked to Lesley's galleries from their Porn Star sites, so we
will also be mailing out all of our affiliates instructing them to update/remove their links.

Let us make it clear that we brought the content in good faith and still 100% believe that we are legally allowed to do so, but to
stop any embarrassment to the model that we may have caused her we shall delete all of Lesley's content from our site.

I'm actually sorry for bringing this to the boards and causing this drama, ours as well as others, and hope by removing the
content of Lesley we can bring this issue to an end. Thanks

Nick
Dollars4babes.com

Actually I was refering to Epassporte helping her not me. I dont have that kind of leverage sorry if your missunderstanding my post. I could always use wing men I'm get old and lazy in my old age

I would just like to add that the urls people are showing are NOT ours or from our site. We did NOT suggest she was a pornstar at any time.


Anyway they are going down now, and affiliates will be asked to remove all links.

But please understand these sets have been sold to many many adult webmasters. We used the images in good faith, but will now remove them out of respect for Lesley. We would have done this in the first place if we were asked in the correct manner.

We never post drama, but this was posted to let people know about this situation....perhaps that was not the best idea

that was a very classy thing to do.. like I said I thought the site looked great just hit to close to home and it wasnt your site it was really how they were promoting her to you.. and the trash talk about epass that upset me..

your program looks great BTW

good post.. i think your original "beef" wasnt the photo's as i'm sure anyone would pull photo's if they thought they had been used in a way that was derogatory of the original contract.. it was that they first told you , it would be ok as long as you provided documents , and when you did then they decided to do it for personal reasons.. I certainly wouldn't have been offended if they had told me that up front flat out .. ( ie. we noticed one of our employees displayed on your website in a fashion that she feels she did not authroize, and we ask you to remove the pictures in question out of fairness to our employee etc etc )

What he said.....the whole way they DEMANDED to take down the pics even
prior of finding out details obviously made you go....EXCUSE ME? If Epass would
just had friendly asked to provide documents with a friendly explanaition I'm
sure you would have done so and you most likely would have been willing
to sort this thing out in a professional manner. Epass could have saved face
and you could have used Epass as a processor.....This is not the first time
and I doubt it will be the last......oh well....I guess they are free to run
their company as they see fit.....but I doubt it will benefit them.

No worries, and thanks for the comments

But who was the photographer or content supplier?

BTW very cool to remove the pics, but if the sets been sold multiple times
shouldnt it come down to the content supplier to do the right thing?

Was there something odd about the whole shoot such that paper work may have actually been altered???

The content provider was azurecontent.com
I understand they were sold exclusive rights to the pictures from the company Click1Media, who took the pics. There is nothing in my opinion to suggest that the paper work had, or has been altered.

actually it was a good idea, at least we can see how is epass staff unprofessional in such cases.

Bitch slapp'd