Quote:
|
Originally Posted by onlytease
|
Hell... and if you read between the lines (bottom of article) .. there is a reference to other admitted offences against a 14 year old. This is a pathetic specimen where, bets on, he has committed other related offences as well - but just not been caught.
Only
worth but he knew what he was doing - he's done similiar shit before and either just a sicko or combination of that and evil with probably "controlling tendencies" (eg.. the other defendant). This sounds like he is of similar makeup to Ian Brady (of moors murders) and he seriously need locked up for a long time for the protection of others plus undergo psycho treatment to see if they can do anything with him.
Only my unbalanced view, but 25 years served time sounds more relevant. But presume the judge knows better from the evidence and psycho reports he's had - who are we to judge?
