Internet censorship
Internet censorship
December 9, 2005 -- Internet censorship. It did not happen overnight but slowly came
to America's shores from testing grounds in China and the Middle East.
Progressive and investigative journalist web site administrators are beginning to
talk to each other about it, e-mail users are beginning to understand why their e-
mail is being disrupted by it, major search engines appear to be complying with it,
and the low to equal signal-to-noise ratio of legitimate e-mail and spam appears to
be perpetuated by it.
In this case, ?it,? is what privacy and computer experts have long warned about:
massive censorship of the web on a nationwide and global scale. For many years, the
web has been heavily censored in countries around the world. That censorship
continues at this very moment. Now it is happening right here in America.
The agreement by the Congress to extend an enhanced Patriot Act for another four
years will permit the political enforcers of the Bush administration, who use law
enforcement as their proxies, to further clamp censorship controls on the web.
Internet Censorship: The Warning Signs Were Not Hidden
The warning signs for the crackdown on the web have been with us for over a decade.
The Clipper chip controversy of the 90s, John Poindexter?s Total Information
Awareness (TIA) system pushed in the aftermath of 9-11, backroom deals between the
Federal government and the Internet service industry, and the Patriot Act have
ushered in a new era of Internet censorship, something just half a decade ago
computer programmers averred was impossible given the nature of the web. They were
wrong, dead wrong.
Take for example of what recently occurred when two journalists were taking on the
phone about a story that appeared on Google News. The story was about a Christian
fundamentalist move in Congress to use U.S. military force in Sudan to end genocide
in Darfur. The story appeared on the English Google News site in Qatar. But the very
same Google News site when accessed simultaneously in Washington, DC failed to show
the article. This censorship is accomplished by geolocation filtering: the
restriction or modifying of web content based on the geographical region of the
user. In addition to countries, such filtering can now be implemented for states,
cities, and even individual IP addresses.
With reports in the Swedish newspaper Svensa Dagbladet today that the United States
has transmitted a Homeland Security Department "no fly" list of 80,000 suspected
terrorists to airport authorities around the world, it is not unreasonable that a
"no [or restricted] surfing/emailing" list has been transmitted to Internet Service
Providers around the world. The systematic disruptions of web sites and email
strongly suggests that such a list exists.
News reports on CIA prisoner flights and secret prisons are disappearing from Google
and other search engines like Alltheweb as fast as they appear. Here now, gone
tomorrow is the name of the game.
Google is systematically failing to list and link to articles that contain explosive
information about the Bush administration, the war in Iraq, Al Qaeda, and U.S.
political scandals. But Google is not alone in working closely to stifle Internet
discourse. America On Line, Microsoft, Yahoo and others are slowly turning the
Internet into an information superhighway dominated by barricades, toll booths, off-
ramps that lead to dead ends, choke points, and security checks.
America On Line is the most egregious is stifling Internet freedom. A former AOL
employee noted how AOL and other Internet Service Providers cooperate with the Bush
administration in censoring email. The Patriot Act gave federal agencies the power
to review information to the packet level and AOL was directed by agencies like the
FBI to do more than sniff the subject line. The AOL term of service (TOS) has
gradually been expanded to grant AOL virtually universal power regarding
information. Many AOL users are likely unaware of the elastic clause, which says
they will be bound by the current TOS and any TOS revisions which AOL may elect at
any time in the future. Essentially, AOL users once agreed to allow the censorship
and non-delivery of their email.
Microsoft has similar requirements for Hotmail as do Yahoo and Google for their
respective e-mail services.
There are also many cases of Google?s search engine failing to list and link to
certain information. According to a number of web site administrators who carry anti-
Bush political content, this situation has become more pronounced in the last month.
In addition, many web site administrators are reporting a dramatic drop-off in hits
to their sites, according to their web statistic analyzers. Adding to their woes is
the frequency at which spam viruses are being spoofed as coming from their web site
addresses.
Government disruption of the political side of the web can easily be hidden amid
hyped mainstream news media reports of the latest "boutique" viruses and worms,
reports that have more to do with the sales of anti-virus software and services than
actual long-term disruption of banks, utilities, or airlines.
Internet Censorship in the US: No Longer a Prediction
Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Cisco Systems have honed their skills at Internet
censorship for years in places like China, Jordan, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, the United
Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and other countries. They have learned well. They will be
the last to admit they have imported their censorship skills into the United States
at the behest of the Bush regime. Last year, the Bush-Cheney campaign blocked
international access to its web site -- www.georgewbush.com -- for unspecified
"security reasons."
Only those in the Federal bureaucracy and the companies involved are in a position
to know what deals have been made and how extensive Internet censorship has become.
They owe full disclosure to their customers and their fellow citizens.
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com
December 9, 2005 -- Internet censorship. It did not happen overnight but slowly came
to America's shores from testing grounds in China and the Middle East.
Progressive and investigative journalist web site administrators are beginning to
talk to each other about it, e-mail users are beginning to understand why their e-
mail is being disrupted by it, major search engines appear to be complying with it,
and the low to equal signal-to-noise ratio of legitimate e-mail and spam appears to
be perpetuated by it.
In this case, ?it,? is what privacy and computer experts have long warned about:
massive censorship of the web on a nationwide and global scale. For many years, the
web has been heavily censored in countries around the world. That censorship
continues at this very moment. Now it is happening right here in America.
The agreement by the Congress to extend an enhanced Patriot Act for another four
years will permit the political enforcers of the Bush administration, who use law
enforcement as their proxies, to further clamp censorship controls on the web.
Internet Censorship: The Warning Signs Were Not Hidden
The warning signs for the crackdown on the web have been with us for over a decade.
The Clipper chip controversy of the 90s, John Poindexter?s Total Information
Awareness (TIA) system pushed in the aftermath of 9-11, backroom deals between the
Federal government and the Internet service industry, and the Patriot Act have
ushered in a new era of Internet censorship, something just half a decade ago
computer programmers averred was impossible given the nature of the web. They were
wrong, dead wrong.
Take for example of what recently occurred when two journalists were taking on the
phone about a story that appeared on Google News. The story was about a Christian
fundamentalist move in Congress to use U.S. military force in Sudan to end genocide
in Darfur. The story appeared on the English Google News site in Qatar. But the very
same Google News site when accessed simultaneously in Washington, DC failed to show
the article. This censorship is accomplished by geolocation filtering: the
restriction or modifying of web content based on the geographical region of the
user. In addition to countries, such filtering can now be implemented for states,
cities, and even individual IP addresses.
With reports in the Swedish newspaper Svensa Dagbladet today that the United States
has transmitted a Homeland Security Department "no fly" list of 80,000 suspected
terrorists to airport authorities around the world, it is not unreasonable that a
"no [or restricted] surfing/emailing" list has been transmitted to Internet Service
Providers around the world. The systematic disruptions of web sites and email
strongly suggests that such a list exists.
News reports on CIA prisoner flights and secret prisons are disappearing from Google
and other search engines like Alltheweb as fast as they appear. Here now, gone
tomorrow is the name of the game.
Google is systematically failing to list and link to articles that contain explosive
information about the Bush administration, the war in Iraq, Al Qaeda, and U.S.
political scandals. But Google is not alone in working closely to stifle Internet
discourse. America On Line, Microsoft, Yahoo and others are slowly turning the
Internet into an information superhighway dominated by barricades, toll booths, off-
ramps that lead to dead ends, choke points, and security checks.
America On Line is the most egregious is stifling Internet freedom. A former AOL
employee noted how AOL and other Internet Service Providers cooperate with the Bush
administration in censoring email. The Patriot Act gave federal agencies the power
to review information to the packet level and AOL was directed by agencies like the
FBI to do more than sniff the subject line. The AOL term of service (TOS) has
gradually been expanded to grant AOL virtually universal power regarding
information. Many AOL users are likely unaware of the elastic clause, which says
they will be bound by the current TOS and any TOS revisions which AOL may elect at
any time in the future. Essentially, AOL users once agreed to allow the censorship
and non-delivery of their email.
Microsoft has similar requirements for Hotmail as do Yahoo and Google for their
respective e-mail services.
There are also many cases of Google?s search engine failing to list and link to
certain information. According to a number of web site administrators who carry anti-
Bush political content, this situation has become more pronounced in the last month.
In addition, many web site administrators are reporting a dramatic drop-off in hits
to their sites, according to their web statistic analyzers. Adding to their woes is
the frequency at which spam viruses are being spoofed as coming from their web site
addresses.
Government disruption of the political side of the web can easily be hidden amid
hyped mainstream news media reports of the latest "boutique" viruses and worms,
reports that have more to do with the sales of anti-virus software and services than
actual long-term disruption of banks, utilities, or airlines.
Internet Censorship in the US: No Longer a Prediction
Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Cisco Systems have honed their skills at Internet
censorship for years in places like China, Jordan, Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, the United
Arab Emirates, Vietnam, and other countries. They have learned well. They will be
the last to admit they have imported their censorship skills into the United States
at the behest of the Bush regime. Last year, the Bush-Cheney campaign blocked
international access to its web site -- www.georgewbush.com -- for unspecified
"security reasons."
Only those in the Federal bureaucracy and the companies involved are in a position
to know what deals have been made and how extensive Internet censorship has become.
They owe full disclosure to their customers and their fellow citizens.
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com
Comment