2257 Update?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baycouples
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2004
    • 1341

    #1

    2257 Update?

    So, anybody has a word on what's going on with this? Is it postponed yet another month?
  • baycouples
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2004
    • 1341

    #2
    Anybody?

    Comment

    • Denver
      Registered User
      • Apr 2004
      • 22

      #3
      I was wondering the same thing. The last extension expires today unless they grant another 30 days.

      Comment

      • chris01282
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2005
        • 370

        #4
        maybe it was all hype to scare people into closing their sites...

        Comment

        • LaoTzu
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2004
          • 350

          #5
          http://www.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=545946

          Comment

          • JasonB
            Confirmed User
            • Nov 2001
            • 1183

            #6
            Another extension today
            http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=546494

            Comment

            • Redrob
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2004
              • 4791

              #7
              Just got this in from Tom at FSC:

              Denver, Co. ? A motion was filed in the U.S. District Court of Colorado this afternoon that extends for one month the original stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales.

              The extension will terminate December 30, 2005, or until the Court rules on Plaintiffs? motion for preliminary injunction, whichever occurs first. During that time period, the
              Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 § 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition.

              Terms of the original stipulation are once more maintained intact. The Free Speech Coalition would like to thank its members and the adult community for their support and patience during this time period, and also express appreciation to the FSC attorneys for their efforts, and to the U.S. Justice Department for its cooperation.

              Free Speech Coalition is the trade organization of the adult entertainment industry. Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.

              Comment

              • Michaelious
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2004
                • 6720

                #8
                nice to see the regulation is working well then

                Comment

                • shermo

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Redrob
                  Just got this in from Tom at FSC:

                  Denver, Co. ? A motion was filed in the U.S. District Court of Colorado this afternoon that extends for one month the original stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales.

                  The extension will terminate December 30, 2005, or until the Court rules on Plaintiffs? motion for preliminary injunction, whichever occurs first. During that time period, the
                  Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 § 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition.

                  Terms of the original stipulation are once more maintained intact. The Free Speech Coalition would like to thank its members and the adult community for their support and patience during this time period, and also express appreciation to the FSC attorneys for their efforts, and to the U.S. Justice Department for its cooperation.

                  Free Speech Coalition is the trade organization of the adult entertainment industry. Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.
                  I'm willing to bet that this case is backburnered for quite some time. That's good for FSC members, but bad for others.

                  Comment

                  • GoodGuy
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 881

                    #10
                    What should we do, if we have some licensed DVDs, but the studios don't want to give away the 2257 info, because there is no final resolution to this issue? (wich is pretty logic)

                    should we just put the content on the site anyway? and if some day (who knows when?) the court says that we need 2257, the studios give us the 2257 and we are all happy?

                    I know this is a better question for a lawyer, but maybe somebody knows.

                    Cheers.

                    Comment

                    Working...