Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bill8
The first four books are alright - I mean, they are all fiction, but the first four are interestingly done fiction, with a lot of Korzybski and Gurdjieff restated thru the mouth of the non-existent "Don Juan".
Better than a lot of similar books.
The history and background of the books is actually a lot more interesting then the books themselves.
But, their ideas perculated thru a lot of people, and beceme fairly influential, before everybody realized they were fiction.
There was a time everyone thought they were fact, and they were discussed openly in anthropology and religious studies circles.
I like both Korzybski and Gurdjieff, so I enjoyed them.
|
What proof is it you have that they indeed were fiction? Or are you basing these statements on public opinion...
As far as I know it's always been a debate, and it ceased to be a hot topic among scholars because noone really knew for sure whether it was real or not.
I could be wrong though.