Palm Beach County Logs 88,000 More Votes Than Voters - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

messiah1

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 549
Share

Post
#1

Palm Beach County Logs 88,000 More Votes Than Voters

11-05-2004, 08:34 PM

Palm Beach County Logs 88,000 More Votes Than Voters
November 5, 2004 04:56 PM

According to the official election results posted on the Palm Beach County election website, 542,835 ballots were cast for a presidential candidate while only 454,427 voters turned out for the election (including absentee). This leaves a discrepancy of 88,408 votes cast for the presidential candidates.

Palm Beach County's supervisor of elections is Theresa LePore who is known for the 2000 Presidential Election and the notorious "butterfly ballot" that caused confusion among seniors and other Floridians.

Other election oddities occurred throughout Florida with some counties registering a 400% increase in expected voter turnout among Republicans while Democrats supposedly experienced a -60% decline in expected support within certain counties. The 50+ counties experiencing the high percentage fluctuations in expected turnout used optical scan voting machines on November 2nd.

Vote discrepancies were also found in Gahanna, Ohio which gave an extra 4,000 votes to President Bush. The error was explained away by Franklin County administrators as a "glitch" in the electronic voting system.

Update: Palm Beach County has updated their numbers and added 91,802 absentee ballots and 1,041 provisional ballots. The vote totals for president increased by 1,543. To view an archived copy of the previous report, click here. While Palm Beach County appears to have accounted for the discrepancy, this underscores the flaws in the system and data compilation.

http://www.washingtondispatch.com/sp...es/000715.html
Tags: None
messiah1

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 549
Share

Post
#2

11-05-2004, 08:37 PM

This shit is starting to look crazy.
Comment
strats

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 1805
Share

Post
#3

11-05-2004, 08:39 PM

'o woops' or 'right where we want em'?
Comment
jukeboxfrank

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 1207
Share

Post
#4

11-05-2004, 08:39 PM

Update: Palm Beach County has updated their numbers and added 91,802 absentee ballots and 1,041 provisional ballots. The vote totals for president increased by 1,543. To view an archived copy of the previous report, click here. While Palm Beach County appears to have accounted for the discrepancy, this underscores the flaws in the system and data compilation.

For more information, see Shane Cory's latest commentary, Should

ICQ= 231-182-592
Comment
KRL

Entrepreneur

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 31429
Share

Post
#5

11-05-2004, 08:46 PM

Do people honestly believe its possible to count the 120 million votes in 50 states in thousands of counties using all sorts of manual and electronic systems in one night like they do?

Right there you know something isn't kosher.

If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
Comment
strats

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 1805
Share

Post
#6

11-05-2004, 08:59 PM

Originally posted by KRL
Do people honestly believe its possible to count the 120 million votes in 50 states in thousands of counties using all sorts of manual and electronic systems in one night like they do?

Right there you know something isn't kosher.

only way to do it is randomly select people for the counting/monitoring jobs.

There is a way which it could be completely randomized (and honestly) as to who monitors/counts vote counting.

it could be fun as well..

Pack everyone in your little stadium thingie, or a theatre, fly one of those blimps around and drop pieces of paper with job assignment on them. very simple. the whole town is invited. counters, poll boxers, monitors. all done on paper. simple. but then the people might actually be doing the choosing. its sad kinda. but whateva yo za
Comment
Theo

HAL 9000

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 34515
Share

Post
#7

11-05-2004, 09:07 PM

Originally posted by strats
only way to do it is randomly select people for the counting/monitoring jobs.

That's how it works in most EU countries and if you dont attend you face a serious penalty.
Comment
swedguy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 7981
Share

Post
#8

11-05-2004, 09:13 PM

Can someone explain why you need to register as Rep, Dem or No Party when you register to vote?
Comment
Paul Markham

Too old to care

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 52942
Share

Post
#9

11-05-2004, 11:01 PM

Originally posted by swedguy
Can someone explain why you need to register as Rep, Dem or No Party when you register to vote?

You are joking aren't you?

This would make any election easy to defraud.

It's bad enough to know whare someone lives, but to know how they vote is ludicrous. Can't not be true.

Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#10

11-05-2004, 11:05 PM

Let me guess . . . Bush won by 88,408 votes there?
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#11

11-05-2004, 11:07 PM

Originally posted by charly
You are joking aren't you?

This would make any election easy to defraud.

It's bad enough to know whare someone lives, but to know how they vote is ludicrous. Can't not be true.

Look dumbass, you do not understand the political process here, so why don't you read before coming up with stupid comments.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#12

11-05-2004, 11:09 PM

Originally posted by swedguy
Can someone explain why you need to register as Rep, Dem or No Party when you register to vote?

Simple. Before the final elections they hold primaries so each party can decide who their candidate will be.

The Democrats chose from a list of possible Democrat candidates, and the Republicans vote on who they want to represent them in the big election.

If Republicans could vote in the Democrats primaries, the Democrats would be pimping Al Sharpton, and the Republicans would be pimping Dan Quayle.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#13

11-05-2004, 11:11 PM

Originally posted by KRL
Do people honestly believe its possible to count the 120 million votes in 50 states in thousands of counties using all sorts of manual and electronic systems in one night like they do?

Right there you know something isn't kosher.

Ummm, they don't. Small states that have a few hundred thousand residents do, but states like NY and CA, FL etc did not have all votes counted that night. Shit, even Iowa did not have a final vote that night.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#14

11-05-2004, 11:14 PM

Originally posted by charly

It's bad enough to know whare someone lives, but to know how they vote is ludicrous. Can't not be true.

your presumptions are ludicrous. no one knows who you vote for just because they know what party you are registered with
Comment
CET

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 2754
Share

Post
#15

11-05-2004, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by baddog
Simple. Before the final elections they hold primaries so each party can decide who their candidate will be.

The Democrats chose from a list of possible Democrat candidates, and the Republicans vote on who they want to represent them in the big election.

If Republicans could vote in the Democrats primaries, the Democrats would be pimping Al Sharpton, and the Republicans would be pimping Dan Quayle.

Some states, including mine, have open primaries, but most have closed primaries.

Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
Comment
CET

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 2754
Share

Post
#16

11-05-2004, 11:25 PM

Kerry conceded. The results aren't going to change with anything short of at least a small scale revolution.

Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
Comment
VeriSexy

Join The Royal Family

Join Date: Apr 2002

Posts: 25463
Share

Post
#17

11-05-2004, 11:34 PM

88,000 OMG

Looking for a KICK ASS TEEN SPONSOR? Check out ROYAL CASH - THE KING OF TEEN!
Incredible webmaster tools FHGs, Morphing Blog and RSS Feeds, Embedded FLV & WMV Videos.
With TOP RATIO Sites like

TeenStarsOnly.com - Earn $$ with our New Site & Bonus Payouts!!

ATMovs.com | iTeenVideo.com | TeenSexMovs.com | TeenSexMania.com
Comment
playa

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 6432
Share

Post
#18

11-05-2004, 11:41 PM

Originally posted by CET
Kerry conceded. The results aren't going to change with anything short of at least a small scale revolution.

It's a political courtesy not a law... Rumor is that they made that statement but still working in the background
Comment
pussyluver

Clueless OleMan

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 11009
Share

Post
#19

11-05-2004, 11:45 PM

Originally posted by KRL
Do people honestly believe its possible to count the 120 million votes in 50 states in thousands of counties using all sorts of manual and electronic systems in one night like they do?

Right there you know something isn't kosher.

On election night or the next day, we get unoffical results. Just plain can't count that many votes with out errors. No big surprise. So the unoffical results is cause we wanna know NOW. Usually the spread is wide enough that errors won't affect the outcome.

This is a good time to point out to our friends that don't live here that there are poll watchers from BOTH parties making sure all is "kosher".

Cheating? Of course!! on both sides, the hope is it is evenly distributed along with the errors.

Chad? If you didn't check your ballot this time around, you ARE an idiot. My polling place had big signs up advising to check the ballot. To be honest, I think the punch cards are fine. Esp if you check it before you place the vote in the box. Data can be lost to easy with computerized voting. Just don't have the same confort level as with the paper ballot.
Comment
SleazyDream

I'm here for SPORT

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 41470
Share

Post
#20

11-05-2004, 11:46 PM

Originally posted by KRL
Do people honestly believe its possible to count the 120 million votes in 50 states in thousands of counties using all sorts of manual and electronic systems in one night like they do?

Right there you know something isn't kosher.

it's possible if the powers that be actually want it to happen

This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

Now read without the word dog.
Comment
playa

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 6432
Share

Post
#21

11-05-2004, 11:49 PM

Originally posted by pussyluver
Data can be lost to easy with computerized voting. Just don't have the same confort level as with the paper ballot.

especially when there using m$.. I couldn't believe states were using Microsoft Access for their database
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#22

11-05-2004, 11:51 PM

Originally posted by SleazyDream
it's possible if the powers that be actually want it to happen

They don't even pretend that all the votes are counted. The make projections based on the votes that were counted. They new Kerry had CA when only 19% of the votes were counted. They don't need exact numbers to be able to figure it out, except in very rare situations.

Small counties and states are able for count 300,000 ballots in 5 hours rather easily
Comment
WickedVenus

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 3877
Share

Post
#23

11-05-2004, 11:51 PM

Originally posted by playa
It's a political courtesy not a law... Rumor is that they made that statement but still working in the background

your absolutly right!!!

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.
Comment
pussyluver

Clueless OleMan

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 11009
Share

Post
#24

11-05-2004, 11:53 PM

Originally posted by playa
It's a political courtesy not a law... Rumor is that they made that statement but still working in the background

Yes, it is possible for the results to change. Ohio would be the place. Casue a Kerry win there would give him the EVs to win the election. None of this is offical yet.

Find a few thousand ballots in the trunk of a car (this has happened) and it is possible for things to change and Kerry could become the offical winner. Doubt this will happen as a 100K+ votes is a big number, but....
Comment
pussyluver

Clueless OleMan

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 11009
Share

Post
#25

11-05-2004, 11:55 PM

Originally posted by baddog
They don't even pretend that all the votes are counted. The make projections based on the votes that were counted. They new Kerry had CA when only 19% of the votes were counted. They don't need exact numbers to be able to figure it out, except in very rare situations.

Small counties and states are able for count 300,000 ballots in 5 hours rather easily

Hey baddog Another night of political humor!!!
Comment
pussyluver

Clueless OleMan

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 11009
Share

Post
#26

11-06-2004, 12:01 AM

Required reading:

http://www.archives.gov/federal_regi...llege/faq.html

Also note:
Guam has cast its Zero electoral votes. Unfortunately, the territory of Guam cannot cast votes in the electoral college for President, because like Puerto Rico it is not a state. The citizens of Guam are also United States citizens and can vote if they move to the States or D.C.

That's fair, NOT.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#27

11-06-2004, 12:15 AM

Originally posted by pussyluver
Required reading:

http://www.archives.gov/federal_regi...llege/faq.html

Also note:
Guam has cast its Zero electoral votes. Unfortunately, the territory of Guam cannot cast votes in the electoral college for President, because like Puerto Rico it is not a state. The citizens of Guam are also United States citizens and can vote if they move to the States or D.C.

That's fair, NOT.

I think Washington DC got EV's sometime after I graduated highschool.

I seemed to recall that there used to be only 535 EV's. Never had to worry about a tie in those days.
Comment
bizmak

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 10014
Share

Post
#28

11-06-2004, 02:44 AM

the whole thing is getting exposed.. what now?
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...