Attention COMCAST users

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • goBigtime
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2002
    • 7761

    #1

    Attention COMCAST users

    http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/lis.../msg38939.html


    Comcast Admits To Spying on Customers
    To [email protected]
    From Jei <[email protected]>
    Date Fri, 15 Feb 2002 03:03:58 +0200
    Reply-To Law & Policy of Computer Communications <[email protected]>
    Sender Law & Policy of Computer Communications <[email protected]>

    http://www.osopinion.com/perl/story/16316.html

    Comcast Admits To Spying on Customers

    By Tim McDonald
    www.NewsFactor.com,
    Part of the NewsFactor Network
    February 13, 2002

    Stored data can be subpoenaed by law enforcement officials or by lawyers in
    civil cases - and it can be stolen.

    Cable Internet giant Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSK) reportedly has begun tracking
    the Web browsing habits of its customers, keeping records of every Web page
    they visit. The company has roughly 1 million high-speed Internet customers.

    The third largest cable TV company behind AT&T Cable and AOL Time Warner
    (NYSE: AOL), Comcast admitted that it stores the Internet Protocol (IP)
    addresses -- unique numeric Internet addresses assigned to subscribers --
    along with the Internet address of every Web page subscribers visit.

    Jeffrey Chester of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Digital Democracy,
    a nonprofit watchdog group, called the tracking "incredibly aggressive."

    "It's not a surprise they are tracking what people are doing, it's just the
    tip of the iceberg," Chester told NewsFactor. "The next generation of
    broadband services provided by Comcast and others allows for this kind of
    tracking. The whole business model moving forward for cable and the
    television industry generally is one which emulates the deeply personalized
    e-commerce strategies."

    Sensitive Information

    Comcast also said it stores sensitive information, such as credit card
    numbers and passwords, in a database managed by network infrastructure
    specialist Inktomi (Nasdaq: INKT).

    Stored data can be subpoenaed by law enforcement officials or lawyers in
    civil cases -- and, as has been proven several times, it can be stolen.

    For example, last week, a database with thousands of records involving
    potential Comcast Business Communication Internet customers was found
    exposed on the Web.

    Comcast said the snooping was part of a technological overhaul launched to
    save money, according to wire service reports. However, Inktomi, which sold
    the technology to Comcast, asserted that Comcast was collecting more
    information than was absolutely necessary for technological enhancements.

    Leading Role

    Comcast claimed the tracking is permitted in its service agreement with
    subscribers and said it does not intend to infringe on the privacy of its
    customers. The company would not say how long the information it collected
    was stored.

    A company spokesperson said that customers' Web browsing is being recorded
    in Detroit, Michigan, and parts of Delaware and Virginia, and that such
    tracking will spread across the United States by the end of this week.

    "Personalized television is really the cornerstone of the plan Comcast and
    others have for the convergence of television with the Internet in the
    broadband online medium," Chester said. "So, technologies are being
    deployed, strategies are being developed, investments are being made in
    hardware and software and applications all across the board -- and Comcast
    is playing the leading role in that regard."

    Excuse for Privacy Erosion?

    Some civil libertarian groups have openly expressed concern about the
    erosion of online privacy in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist
    strikes.

    The FBI has been particularly aggressive in rooting out online evidence,
    serving ISPs with warrants under a 1978 antiterrorism law.

    "The privacy debate has been placed on the back burner, conveniently for
    companies like Comcast, because of the concern over security since September
    11th," Chester said. "As this and other incidents will undoubtedly show, we
    need strong consumer safeguards when it comes to cable broadband."

    More Cities 'Digitized'

    Comcast announced a fourth-quarter net loss of US$321 million, due mainly to
    its costly effort to migrate customers from @Home, the broadband Internet
    service provider that recently filed for bankruptcy.

    The company has said it plans to add more high-speed Internet customers and
    is planning to spend $1.3 billion to get more cities "digitized."

    Comcast made a winning bid of $72 billion for AT&T Broadband in December. If
    the deal is approved by shareholders, the Federal Trade Commission and the
    Federal Communications Commission, it will result in the largest cable ISP
    in the United States, with 2.2 million high-speed Internet customers.

    The combined company would be called AT&T Comcast Corp.
    Last edited by goBigtime; 11-05-2004, 03:32 PM.
  • AndrewKanuck
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2004
    • 6706

    #2
    And?

    Comment

    • goBigtime
      Confirmed User
      • Nov 2002
      • 7761

      #3
      Originally posted by AndrewKanuck
      And?
      And now you know.

      Comment

      • AndrewKanuck
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2004
        • 6706

        #4
        Originally posted by goBigtime
        And now you know.
        I knew that long ago

        Comment

        • Jace
          FBOP Class Of 2013
          • Jan 2004
          • 35562

          #5
          who the fuck cares?

          unless you doing something illegal you don't have to worry

          Comment

          • playa
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2001
            • 6432

            #6
            all ISP's do it,, i guess they just publiclly admit it

            Comment

            • bangman
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2004
              • 5283

              #7
              yeah, not a big deal.
              - David Hall
              ICQ: 312744199

              Comment

              • goBigtime
                Confirmed User
                • Nov 2002
                • 7761

                #8
                ::shakes head::

                You guys amaze me.



                You don't have to be doing something illegal for this to be bad.

                All this goverment profiling of it's citizens is just... creepy.


                I would think in an industry that could be destroyed (in the US anyway) on the outcome of a single censorship case would be able to see and understand that.
                Last edited by goBigtime; 11-05-2004, 04:07 PM.

                Comment

                • oldnewbie
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 394

                  #9
                  Originally posted by goBigtime
                  ::shakes head::

                  You guys amaze me.



                  You don't have to be doing something illegal for this to be bad.

                  All this goverment profiling of it's citizens is just... creepy.


                  I would think in an industry that could be destroyed (in the US anyway) on the outcome of a single censorship case would be able to see and understand that.
                  Sheople are being de-sensitized to this sort of thing. Like the frog heated in the pot until boiling. A little bit at a time, so it never seems like a big enough deal to care.

                  Where's my tin foil hat, I need to block some of those government apathy rays.

                  Comment

                  Working...