I voted against gay marriage in my state.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • coolfuck
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2004
    • 2440

    #51
    man why do u care about that?
    WANT TO PLACE YOUR TEXT/BANNER HERE?
    MSG ME:ICQ Number :43-420-088

    Comment

    • detoxed
      vip member
      • Jan 2003
      • 17798

      #52
      Originally posted by GatorB
      UM No you don't vote on that your state legislator does. marriage is a STATES issue. Anyone that wants teh FEDERAL govermnet to deal with marriage is anti-American. Does the FEDERAL governent do ANYTHING well?
      Really? You do realize that they have state elections on the same ballot as federal? And if the STATE wants to pass a law banning gay marriage they can let the population of the state vote on that? Clueless stupid fuck.

      Comment

      • detoxed
        vip member
        • Jan 2003
        • 17798

        #53
        Originally posted by Dildozer
        Yep, let's ignore the REAL current problems and try to hide our biggotry behind an increase in insurance that "could" happen.

        And then you say you're not threatened

        I HATE you. Theres some bigotry for ya.

        Comment

        • detoxed
          vip member
          • Jan 2003
          • 17798

          #54
          MISSISSIPPI
          Proposed Amendment: "Marriage may take place and may be valid under the laws of this state only between a man and a woman. A marriage in another state or foreign jurisdiction between persons of the same gender, regardless of when the marriage took place, may not be recognized in this state and is void and unenforceable under the laws of this state." (link to official text)
          Appears on Mississippi's statewide ballot: NOV. 2

          Comment

          • ColBigBalls
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2003
            • 1733

            #55
            Originally posted by detoxed
            MISSISSIPPI
            Proposed Amendment: "Marriage may take place and may be valid under the laws of this state only between a man and a woman. A marriage in another state or foreign jurisdiction between persons of the same gender, regardless of when the marriage took place, may not be recognized in this state and is void and unenforceable under the laws of this state." (link to official text)
            Appears on Mississippi's statewide ballot: NOV. 2
            cause mississippi is the golden poster boy for civil rights in america for the last 100 years

            Comment

            • Holly
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Jun 2003
              • 10017

              #56
              Originally posted by Afrekete
              Even if both girls are hot?
              If Jenna Jameson and Briana Banks wanted to get married it would be a non-issue. Not only would the vote pass by a landslide, you'd have every man in California lined up half way across the state to pay 39.99 to watch the honeymoon. ;-}
              War National Damn Champions Eagle

              Comment

              • detoxed
                vip member
                • Jan 2003
                • 17798

                #57
                Originally posted by ColBigBalls
                cause mississippi is the golden poster boy for civil rights in america for the last 100 years
                So? Tons of other states have these laws.

                Comment

                • detoxed
                  vip member
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 17798

                  #58
                  Originally posted by detoxed
                  So? Tons of other states have these laws.
                  And if you've never been to the South, you have no idea how it really is. In California a normal suburb white person might see 1-2 black people a week. In Mississippi, you see about 50% or more. Of course there will be more conflict.

                  Comment

                  • ColBigBalls
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 1733

                    #59
                    Originally posted by detoxed
                    So? Tons of other states have these laws.
                    you missed the point

                    go watch mississippi burning

                    Comment

                    • detoxed
                      vip member
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 17798

                      #60
                      Originally posted by ColBigBalls
                      you missed the point

                      go watch mississippi burning
                      I know your point, but its ignorant, like I explained.

                      Comment

                      • BRISK
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 12240

                        #61
                        A legal denial of rights or benefits afforded to others, directly contradicts the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution which provides for equal protection and substantive due process under the law, meaning that rights conferred to one person cannot be denied to another.
                        Discuss
                        I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
                        I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

                        Comment

                        • Nightraven
                          Confirmed User
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 314

                          #62
                          Originally posted by detoxed
                          Hmm.. I guess that just shows your maturity level.
                          Nope - shows how much brains you have.. Sorry the lack there of
                          The Bondage Blog --> Fetish-gals.com/blogger.html

                          Comment

                          • SongRider
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2001
                            • 651

                            #63
                            Well I voted "no" against banning gay marriages. The LAST thing we need is MORE rules from the government telling people how to live.

                            Plus I think the only reason it was ever an issue to begin with this time around was another Bush decoy to get people bitching about that instead of looking at the mess he made after 911.

                            Comment

                            • ColBigBalls
                              Confirmed User
                              • Aug 2003
                              • 1733

                              #64
                              Originally posted by detoxed
                              I know your point, but its ignorant, like I explained.
                              no you said it had the same laws as many other states.. that only shows how many other stats are as backward a mississippi..

                              this isent 1845 more then half the laws in effect today are outdated.

                              Hell hre in canada.. its still illegal to park your carrage on young street in toronto between 8 pm and 8 am..

                              have a look at your public charter you might have a good laugh and get the point

                              Comment

                              • Dawgy
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2001
                                • 5856

                                #65
                                Originally posted by SongRider
                                Well I voted "no" against banning gay marriages. The LAST thing we need is MORE rules from the government telling people how to live.

                                Plus I think the only reason it was ever an issue to begin with this time around was another Bush decoy to get people bitching about that instead of looking at the mess he made after 911.
                                thank you for that bit of reason & logic.

                                people have the right to vote how they wish, and id never hold it against anyone for voting their beliefs.

                                its just sad that in this day & age people are still trying to base laws and constitutional ammendments on personal beliefs and religion, rather than logic & equal rights in their purest form.
                                the revolution is coming.

                                Comment

                                • UnclePecker
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Jun 2004
                                  • 266

                                  #66
                                  I guess I'm just not arrogant enough to think I should control what others do with their life.
                                  I could care less if Bob/Don get married. WTF does it matter to me....

                                  And BTW, I live in Mississippi. We aren't all backward rednecks.
                                  But there are more than enough here I will admit.
                                  Last edited by UnclePecker; 11-02-2004, 12:54 PM.

                                  Comment

                                  • BRISK
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Feb 2003
                                    • 12240

                                    #67
                                    In most of the southern states, various laws were passed making it illegal for members of different races to marry; these were known as miscegenation laws, like the South African Immorality Act. Interracial marriage was prohibited by state laws, the constitutonality of which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in "Pace v. Alabama" (1883). That decision was not overturned until the United States Supreme Court ruled in "Loving v. Virginia" (1967). At that time, 16 states still had laws prohibiting interracial marriage.

                                    While miscegenation laws were ruled unconstitutional in the United States by the Supreme Court in 1967, those laws were not completely repealed in individual states until November 2000 when Alabama became the last state to repeal its law.

                                    "In November 2000, after a statewide vote in a special election, Alabama became the last state to overturn a law that was an ugly reminder of America's past, a ban on interracial marriage. The one-time home of George Wallace and Martin Luther King Jr. had held onto the provision for 33 years after the Supreme Court declared anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional. Yet as the election revealed -- 40 percent of Alabamans voted to keep the ban -- many people still see the necessity for a law that prohibits blacks and whites from mixing blood."
                                    I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
                                    I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

                                    Comment

                                    • ColBigBalls
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Aug 2003
                                      • 1733

                                      #68
                                      Originally posted by UnclePecker
                                      I guess I'm just not arrogant enough to think I should control what others do with their life.
                                      I could care less if Bob/Don get married. WTF does it matter to me....

                                      And BTW, I live in Mississippi. We aren't all backward rednecks.
                                      But there are more than enough here I will admit.
                                      im not trying to lable any one person or even a group for that matter. like i said the same issue is everywhere.. its just to bad

                                      Comment

                                      • detoxed
                                        vip member
                                        • Jan 2003
                                        • 17798

                                        #69
                                        Originally posted by Dawgy
                                        thank you for that bit of reason & logic.

                                        people have the right to vote how they wish, and id never hold it against anyone for voting their beliefs.

                                        its just sad that in this day & age people are still trying to base laws and constitutional ammendments on personal beliefs and religion, rather than logic & equal rights in their purest form.
                                        wrong! it has nothing to do with personal beliefs or religion. marriage has been between man and woman for thousands of years. have you heard of a marriage of man / man anytime in history? A marriage. NO. Because thats not marriage!

                                        Comment

                                        • BRISK
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Feb 2003
                                          • 12240

                                          #70
                                          Originally posted by detoxed
                                          wrong! it has nothing to do with personal beliefs or religion. marriage has been between man and woman for thousands of years. have you heard of a marriage of man / man anytime in history? A marriage. NO. Because thats not marriage!
                                          Because of course, religion hasn't had any influence over people's personal beleifs anytime in the past thousands of years.

                                          I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
                                          I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

                                          Comment

                                          • detoxed
                                            vip member
                                            • Jan 2003
                                            • 17798

                                            #71
                                            Originally posted by BRISK
                                            Because of course, religion hasn't had any influence over people's personal beleifs anytime in the past thousands of years.


                                            since i dont believe in god or any religion, i dont see how religion would influence my decision? You arent giving any arguments against me.

                                            Comment

                                            • BRISK
                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                              • Feb 2003
                                              • 12240

                                              #72
                                              Originally posted by detoxed
                                              since i dont believe in god or any religion, i dont see how religion would influence my decision? You arent giving any arguments against me.
                                              You're likely a product of your environment/society where you've been conditioned to think the way you do. You might not be religious, but the other 99% of people around you might be, and their beliefs surround you every day.

                                              Conditioning is a powerful force. Ask Pavlov.
                                              I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
                                              I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

                                              Comment

                                              • ColBigBalls
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Aug 2003
                                                • 1733

                                                #73
                                                Originally posted by detoxed
                                                wrong! it has nothing to do with personal beliefs or religion. marriage has been between man and woman for thousands of years. have you heard of a marriage of man / man anytime in history? A marriage. NO. Because thats not marriage!
                                                because the though of same sex marrage over the last 5000 years was enough for the religous comunity to strap you to a tree and strech your neck

                                                moron.

                                                Comment

                                                • BRISK
                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                  • Feb 2003
                                                  • 12240

                                                  #74
                                                  Originally posted by detoxed
                                                  have you heard of a marriage of man / man anytime in history? A marriage. NO. Because thats not marriage!
                                                  So because same-sex marriage hasn't existed in the past, it should therefore be denied from existing in the future?
                                                  I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do,
                                                  I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • detoxed
                                                    vip member
                                                    • Jan 2003
                                                    • 17798

                                                    #75
                                                    Originally posted by BRISK
                                                    So because same-sex marriage hasn't existed in the past, it should therefore be denied from existing in the future?

                                                    yes. thats not the reason, but your statement in whole is true.

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...