Model's I.D. Visible in Photograph

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • neewwman
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2002
    • 1737

    #1

    Model's I.D. Visible in Photograph

    Someone submitted a free site to my link list where an obviously amateur model was holding up her driver's license to prove she was of age. I was shocked to see that you could clearly read the name on the i.d. and not only that, but it was an unusual name (not Jennifer Smith).

    So I Googled the model's name and it turns out she's now a musician with her own web site. I wrote her to let her know there are pics of her on the Internet that identify her.

    She's mortified. She says the pics were taken several years ago and she was told they were for a book.

    What kind of a-hole would sell, as content, a picture that identifies the model by name?

    Porn Wealth Everything the newbie adult webmaster needs to know. Buy it, or sell it through our 50% affiliate program!
  • Sharky
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2002
    • 4938

    #2
    it seems like the webmaster who submitted it to you is a fucking idiot.
    Sharky

    Comment

    • EscortBiz
      Fuck Checks, CASH only!
      • May 2002
      • 19422

      #3
      Originally posted by neewwman


      She's mortified. She says the pics were taken several years ago and she was told they were for a book.

      What kind of a-hole would sell, as content, a picture that identifies the model by name?

      For one shes mostlikly lieing like most of them do "oh I didnt know that the pic of me taking cock up my ass was for porn"

      For the second part I agree we need to protect the ID of models lots of psychos out there.

      Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING

      Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts

      ICQ# 158802076

      Comment

      • detoxed
        vip member
        • Jan 2003
        • 17798

        #4
        Uh there have been several galleries like that, and lots of content providers include these with sets... people have automatic gallery builders that pulls the pics, they never see them.

        Comment

        • detoxed
          vip member
          • Jan 2003
          • 17798

          #5
          BTW post her pics and contact info please, I'd love to meet a sexy musician babe...

          Comment

          • Bigjohn
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2003
            • 1118

            #6
            Not good.... the guy may or may not have rights to post her pics, but he's definitely an idiot for posting the ID!

            Comment

            • neewwman
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2002
              • 1737

              #7
              Originally posted by EscortBiz
              For one shes mostlikly lieing like most of them do "oh I didnt know that the pic of me taking cock up my ass was for porn"
              I don't think she's lying. Her I.D. says she was born in 1975 but she looks very young in the picture, maybe as young as 18. If the pictures were taken in 1993 Internet porn was probably the last thing on her mind.

              Also, she had pimples, an imperfect body, etc. so clearly she wasn't thinking she was going to have a big career in porn.

              Porn Wealth Everything the newbie adult webmaster needs to know. Buy it, or sell it through our 50% affiliate program!

              Comment

              • neewwman
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2002
                • 1737

                #8
                Originally posted by detoxed
                Uh there have been several galleries like that, and lots of content providers include these with sets...
                I can understand a picture that shows the driver's license, but where the name is clearly readable? Haven't seen that before.

                Porn Wealth Everything the newbie adult webmaster needs to know. Buy it, or sell it through our 50% affiliate program!

                Comment

                • Mike Okitch
                  Confirmed User
                  • May 2004
                  • 4126

                  #9
                  Originally posted by neewwman
                  I can understand a picture that shows the driver's license, but where the name is clearly readable? Haven't seen that before.
                  I have seen some.

                  And it's scary that some gallery submitter wouldn't have the intelligence to pick up on that.

                  Goes to show that not everybody actually look at what they're buying.
                  SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                  Comment

                  • vixm
                    Confirmed User
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 605

                    #10
                    Weird. That's all I can say.

                    I agree with the post above where the chicks are lying; makes a LOT of sense.
                    [sig offline]

                    Comment

                    • mardigras
                      Bon temps!
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 14194

                      #11
                      Content providers shouldn't include the ID shot in the same folder with the content pics. Webmasters who use automatic gallery creating software should look at those galleries at least once after they go online. Heck, there could be something wrong that interferes with your sponsor link
                      .

                      Comment

                      • TheSenator
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 13330

                        #12
                        Originally posted by EscortBiz
                        For one shes mostlikly lieing like most of them do "oh I didnt know that the pic of me taking cock up my ass was for porn"

                        For the second part I agree we need to protect the ID of models lots of psychos out there.
                        I strongly agree with protecting a model's identity.


                        The model's identity should be kept away from the public eye.
                        ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                        Comment

                        • foolio
                          ICQ: 178725656
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 12366

                          #13
                          Originally posted by neewwman
                          Someone submitted a free site to my link list where an obviously amateur model was holding up her driver's license to prove she was of age. I was shocked to see that you could clearly read the name on the i.d. and not only that, but it was an unusual name (not Jennifer Smith).

                          So I Googled the model's name and it turns out she's now a musician with her own web site. I wrote her to let her know there are pics of her on the Internet that identify her.

                          She's mortified. She says the pics were taken several years ago and she was told they were for a book.

                          What kind of a-hole would sell, as content, a picture that identifies the model by name?
                          So did you take the time to email the submitter and ask if he knew it was posted?

                          Comment

                          • Sophmaster
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 310

                            #14
                            Ok , here's a question for you all ! If a model sign all papers and do porn pics and videos(and you pay her) and then come back 1 year later to ask to remove all her vids and pics from your site because she think it was a mistake ..... you remove or what ?

                            I ask that cuz happened to me several times !
                            AIM : webcashmaker Email: infoATwebcashmaker.com
                            WebCashMaker Program

                            Comment

                            • foolio
                              ICQ: 178725656
                              • Nov 2002
                              • 12366

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Sophmaster
                              Ok , here's a question for you all ! If a model sign all papers and do porn pics and videos(and you pay her) and then come back 1 year later to ask to remove all her vids and pics from your site because she think it was a mistake ..... you remove or what ?
                              Depends if you are a nice guy or not. There are some girls that pay to get them taken down, but once they go up -- they are out there.

                              Comment

                              • DWB
                                Registered User
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 31779

                                #16
                                $1000 to stop me from using it. But once it's up and out there, all that means is that I will no longer use it. I think that's letting her off the hook VERY cheap.

                                FYI... I have had a few girls want this but none of them came up with the $1000 within the 30 day window I give them.

                                Porn is forever. Think it through ladies.

                                Comment

                                • Mike Okitch
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2004
                                  • 4126

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Sophmaster
                                  Ok , here's a question for you all ! If a model sign all papers and do porn pics and videos(and you pay her) and then come back 1 year later to ask to remove all her vids and pics from your site because she think it was a mistake ..... you remove or what ?

                                  I ask that cuz happened to me several times !
                                  A contract is a contract.

                                  So she should bite the bullet.

                                  Maybe it was a mistake. But generally, after one year, thousands of folks are already jerking off to that mistake.

                                  That being said, I would be happy to remove all pics of the whiny model. But it wouldn't come without a price.
                                  SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                                  Comment

                                  • Sophmaster
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jul 2004
                                    • 310

                                    #18
                                    Well ... I removed all for some girls (for money of course) but for some girls its too impossible to do that ! You know what i am talking about .... Real bombs , incredible beauties that make me do lot of cash !
                                    AIM : webcashmaker Email: infoATwebcashmaker.com
                                    WebCashMaker Program

                                    Comment

                                    • Paul Markham
                                      Too old to care
                                      • Jun 2001
                                      • 52942

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by mardigras
                                      Content providers shouldn't include the ID shot in the same folder with the content pics. Webmasters who use automatic gallery creating software should look at those galleries at least once after they go online. Heck, there could be something wrong that interferes with your sponsor link
                                      Not 100% right. You include it in a seperate folder marked "Documents" with the content in another folder marked "Images".

                                      It needs to be that clear as obviously there are a lot of morons out there. How someone can automate this fro a promotional site is beyond me. Seems that it would pull up the wrong pictures for a TGP site all the time and needs checking. Problem is some people know how to write/run program that will do everything, but know diddlysquat about porn.

                                      as for supplying IDs, it's the law. You have to know the model is over 18 when the images were shot.
                                      Last edited by Paul Markham; 10-30-2004, 10:23 PM.



                                      Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                      PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                      Comment

                                      • stev0
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2003
                                        • 6801

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Mike Okitch
                                        A contract is a contract.

                                        So she should bite the bullet.

                                        Maybe it was a mistake. But generally, after one year, thousands of folks are already jerking off to that mistake.

                                        That being said, I would be happy to remove all pics of the whiny model. But it wouldn't come without a price.
                                        Yeah, exactly... people have to live with their mistakes.

                                        However, posting a model's ID and info is totally retarded and the idiot that did it deserves to be charged.

                                        Comment

                                        • FilthyRob
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Feb 2004
                                          • 6741

                                          #21
                                          Am I the only one who actually wants to see the pics or the gallery?
                                          AKA - Clubsexy

                                          Comment

                                          • The Oracle Porn
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Oct 2004
                                            • 720

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by EscortBiz
                                            "oh I didnt know that the pic of me taking cock up my ass was for porn"
                                            Yes, I am the real Oracle Porn Unban me Lens!
                                            ICQ: 94399723
                                            Find out everything about David Stodghill
                                            IL4L

                                            Comment

                                            • TheMob
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jan 2003
                                              • 8584

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by neewwman
                                              Someone submitted a free site to my link list where an obviously amateur model was holding up her driver's license to prove she was of age. I was shocked to see that you could clearly read the name on the i.d. and not only that, but it was an unusual name (not Jennifer Smith).

                                              So I Googled the model's name and it turns out she's now a musician with her own web site. I wrote her to let her know there are pics of her on the Internet that identify her.

                                              She's mortified. She says the pics were taken several years ago and she was told they were for a book.

                                              What kind of a-hole would sell, as content, a picture that identifies the model by name?
                                              Yeah, I've seen that too. That's fucking retarded.

                                              Comment

                                              • ry0t
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Feb 2003
                                                • 4160

                                                #24
                                                This goes to show how much of a moron you are. Yes the person who owned the gallery was also a moron for posting that pic. But you are a moron for thinking they sold it as content. This is to identify her for the 2257 model releases. You are suppose to keep it on file. I cant believe you have a porn wealth sig and you dont even know that.

                                                Comment

                                                • TheMob
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jan 2003
                                                  • 8584

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by ry0t
                                                  This goes to show how much of a moron you are. Yes the person who owned the gallery was also a moron for posting that pic. But you are a moron for thinking they sold it as content. This is to identify her for the 2257 model releases. You are suppose to keep it on file. I cant believe you have a porn wealth sig and you dont even know that.
                                                  well, she's naked on that picture. so i guess it qualifies as porn.

                                                  Comment

                                                  Working...