2257 Stipulated Agreement Extended Again

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xxxjay
    Tube groupie.
    • Aug 2002
    • 13482

    #1

    2257 Stipulated Agreement Extended Again

    DENVER, CO -- The stipulated agreement between the parties for a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Free Speech Coalition et al v. Alberto Gonzales has been extended for another month. The extension is now scheduled to terminate November 30, 2005, or whenever the court rules on plaintiffs? motion for preliminary injunction. Under the agreement, the Justice Department is restrained from inspecting or enforcing U.S.C. 18 ยง 2257 against plaintiffs in the case, which includes all members of the Free Speech Coalition as of June 23, 2005. It remains the expectation of the FSC attorneys that a decision will come soon from U.S. District Court Judge Walker D. Miller on the plaintiff?s motion for a preliminary injunction.
    ?We understand that the adult entertainment community is as eager as we are to have a ruling on our motion for a preliminary injunction,? said FSC Executive Director Michelle L. Freridge, ?but sometimes the wheels of justice revolve very slowly, and we simply must be patient. But make no mistake, we are as confident as ever that our arguments challenging these abusive regulations will win out at the end of the day. We appreciate your patience, and look forward to ultimate victory in this significant battle to protect your free speech rights.?
    http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
  • Big Red Machine
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2005
    • 9586

    #2
    Originally posted by xxxjay
    ?We understand that the adult entertainment community is as eager as we are to have a ruling on our motion for a preliminary injunction,? said FSC Executive Director Michelle L. Freridge, ?but sometimes the wheels of justice revolve very slowly, and we simply must be patient. But make no mistake, we are as confident as ever that our arguments challenging these abusive regulations will win out at the end of the day. We appreciate your patience, and look forward to ultimate victory in this significant battle to protect your free speech rights.?

    Thanks for the Info Jay

    ICQ:475437214

    Comment

    • Drake
      Hello world!
      • Mar 2003
      • 12508

      #3
      Thanks for the update Jay

      Comment

      • gornyhuy
        Chafed.
        • May 2002
        • 18041

        #4
        Sigh....

        Thanks. IN the mean time I'll just keep shitting bricks.

        icq:159548293

        Comment

        • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
          best designer on GFY
          • Mar 2003
          • 30307

          #5
          Sniveling bitches do not want to hand down a knock out punch to the FSC during Bushes all time low in popularity.

          Why it would show Gonzales and the DOJ are barking up the wrong tree chasing little pornographers when they should be chasing down terrorists that want to kill us.

          Comment

          • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
            best designer on GFY
            • Mar 2003
            • 30307

            #6
            Another thing I was kinda curious about...

            How is it that the DOJ makes it's own laws to prosecute people when it is there job to uphold the law, not make law. Didnt this whole 2257 proposal come from Asscrack?

            Comment

            Working...