Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals to develop products and medicines that benefit human beings?
Is it morally acceptable to experiment on animals?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by TeenGodFather
No. They should use homeless people.
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.
RochardComment
-
You already have three? Cool.Originally posted by bringer
i dont really care who its tested on
id rather have lab rats die then grow a 4th nippleComment
-
Unfortunately, the majority of people feel it is better to sacrifice animals for the sake of humans.
I don't think this opinion will be changing anytime soon.
Most animal experimentation is dramatically better regulated now and things have gotten better. The US government, primarily our military, still conducts gruesome and horrific biowarfare WMD experiments at Ft. Meade on animals including intelligent primates, dogs, and cats.
More and more companies are using computer models thankfully, however many chemicals are still tested on animals prior to their commercial introduction. Rats and Rabbits get the worst tests, often having chemicals inserted into their eyes, on their skin, and into their stomachs to test toxicity levels.
Is it morally acceptable? No.
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains
Adult News
KRL's Newsletter
Biz Tips
Just Listed DomainsComment
-
i am a animal lover, but i agree that sometimes is necessary, i am totally agains testing skin products and shampoo and stuff like that on animals, but in cases like cancer research and aids research i agree with that, i rather have a rat dead than my mother.SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
-
Agreed. It just shows how far along we really are.Originally posted by KRL
Unfortunately, the majority of people feel it is better to sacrifice animals for the sake of humans.
I don't think this opinion will be changing anytime soon.
Most animal experimentation is dramatically better regulated now and things have gotten better. The US government, primarily our military, still conducts gruesome and horrific biowarfare WMD experiments at Ft. Meade on animals including intelligent primates, dogs, and cats.
More and more companies are using computer models thankfully, however many chemicals are still tested on animals prior to their commercial introduction. Rats and Rabbits get the worst tests, often having chemicals inserted into their eyes, on their skin, and into their stomachs to test toxicity levels.
Is it morally acceptable? No.Comment
-
No, it's not morally acceptable, but it's better then the alternative, which is not doing these tests. Not doing these tests would result in medical progress almost completely halting. Millions of lives have been saved just from insulin treatments that were developed through animal testing. It's a rotten deal, but it's better to do animal testing then not to.Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!
Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training
"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."Comment
-
One of them is really just chewing gum.Originally posted by project_naughty
You already have three? Cool.Comment


Comment