Yo punkworld - regarding that article

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirty F
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2001
    • 59204

    #1

    Yo punkworld - regarding that article

    Volkskrant mailed me back that placed several letters sent to them already. Did you see/read them?
  • xlogger
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2004
    • 9507

    #2
    Heard of icq...old man?


    ----------
    XLOGGER [REFLECTED] [OH]

    Comment

    • Dirty F
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jul 2001
      • 59204

      #3
      Originally posted by xlogger
      Heard of icq...old man?


      I dont have him on icq nig and this is interesting for more people than just me. Dutch people.

      Comment

      • Marie
        Confirmed User
        • May 2003
        • 3024

        #4
        Oh shit, I didn't think about it anymore and I used last weeks' newpapers for in the cage of my bunnies. Damn.
        Maria - maria at photorama.nl - Photorama International
        CONTENT LOADS of content in various niches - many photo/video combinations! CONTENT

        Comment

        • Dirty F
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jul 2001
          • 59204

          #5
          Originally posted by Marie
          Oh shit, I didn't think about it anymore and I used last weeks' newpapers for in the cage of my bunnies. Damn.

          Comment

          • Libertine
            sex dwarf
            • May 2002
            • 17860

            #6
            Didn't see it, but I'll take a look now.
            /(bb|[^b]{2})/

            Comment

            • Libertine
              sex dwarf
              • May 2002
              • 17860

              #7
              Saw two letters about it, one saying he shouldn't have included the addresses of such horrible sites and one attacking his lack of statistics and such. Furthermore, the ombudsman dealt with the issue of publishing the URLs of extreme sites or not.

              Basically, they didn't publish a word concerning the outright lies in the article.
              /(bb|[^b]{2})/

              Comment

              • Dirty F
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Jul 2001
                • 59204

                #8
                Originally posted by punkworld
                Saw two letters about it, one saying he shouldn't have included the addresses of such horrible sites and one attacking his lack of statistics and such. Furthermore, the ombudsman dealt with the issue of publishing the URLs of extreme sites or not.

                Basically, they didn't publish a word concerning the outright lies in the article.
                Damn that blows. I wonder if the author got to see any of the letters.

                Comment

                • Libertine
                  sex dwarf
                  • May 2002
                  • 17860

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Franck
                  Damn that blows. I wonder if the author got to see any of the letters.
                  I honestly don't think he's the type of guy who really cares about the facts. He wrote the article mainly to sell books, and I have the suspicion that he included as many links as he did simply to draw people interested in kiddy porn and such.
                  /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                  Comment

                  Working...