What do you think of the new XXXpushers TGP

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RogerV
    Banned!
    • Jul 2002
    • 12591

    #1

    What do you think of the new XXXpushers TGP

    new version http://www.xxxpushers.com/tgp/
  • xclusive
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Apr 2004
    • 35218

    #2
    looking good

    I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


    Comment

    • RogerV
      Banned!
      • Jul 2002
      • 12591

      #3
      Originally posted by xclusive
      looking good
      Thanks! its starting to do some serious sales now

      Comment

      • UltraSonic
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2004
        • 1728

        #4
        What's the traffic like?
        Your Blend, Your Product

        Comment

        • RogerV
          Banned!
          • Jul 2002
          • 12591

          #5
          Anyone wanting to trade traffic we only do hard link trades nothing off the gallery thumbs or blind..

          Comment

          • RogerV
            Banned!
            • Jul 2002
            • 12591

            #6
            Originally posted by UltraSonic
            What's the traffic like?
            Its been building off our exits ,TGP, SEO, exit a mix from everywhere

            Comment

            • UltraSonic
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2004
              • 1728

              #7
              Originally posted by RogerV
              Its been building off our exits ,TGP, SEO, exit a mix from everywhere
              Daily hits?
              Your Blend, Your Product

              Comment

              • xclusive
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Apr 2004
                • 35218

                #8
                Nice sales is what it's all about

                I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


                Comment

                • broke
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 4501

                  #9
                  Went with ap|tgp I see...

                  Perfect Gonzo

                  Comment

                  • RogerV
                    Banned!
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 12591

                    #10
                    Originally posted by UltraSonic
                    Daily hits?
                    Not sure but I think about 20k a day right now without trades

                    Comment

                    • Dalai lama
                      Strength and Honor
                      • Jul 2004
                      • 16540

                      #11
                      Looks great roger. Much better then your old version

                      A program you can trust.
                      Gallerybooster Run multiply TGPs of 1 script

                      Comment

                      • RogerV
                        Banned!
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 12591

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Dalai lama
                        Looks great roger. Much better then your old version

                        Thanks alot. We decided to add nav bar with catagories and many other features like send to a friend to build bookmarks.

                        it gets alot of traffic daily about 50k a day but the bookmarks were lacking. it's still doing great sales though since its an exit off our sites but I expected more bookmarks and return surfers

                        so we gave it a cleaner face lift hope it helps

                        what else would you TGP gurus do?

                        Comment

                        • Fletch XXX
                          GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                          • Jan 2002
                          • 60840

                          #13
                          very slow loading for me here in california

                          Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                          Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                          Comment

                          • RogerV
                            Banned!
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 12591

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Fletch XXX
                            very slow loading for me here in california
                            Really how many seconds would you say
                            its about 4sec for me on the eastcoast.


                            Is it our Site or do I need to give NatNet a ring

                            Comment

                            • Fletch XXX
                              GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                              • Jan 2002
                              • 60840

                              #15
                              Originally posted by RogerV
                              Really how many seconds would you say
                              its about 4sec for me on the eastcoast.


                              Is it our Site or do I need to give NatNet a ring
                              i am on very fast cable, and it took 13 seconds (thats just me c-ounting while it loads) it is a bunch of thumbs so the load could be expected.

                              i live by the rule if your page doesnt load in 8 seconds you lose half your visitors. (dont know where i read that)

                              Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                              Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                              Comment

                              • RogerV
                                Banned!
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 12591

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Fletch XXX
                                i am on very fast cable, and it took 13 seconds (thats just me c-ounting while it loads) it is a bunch of thumbs so the load could be expected.

                                i live by the rule if your page doesnt load in 8 seconds you lose half your visitors. (dont know where i read that)

                                LOL I go by the 10 second rule.. Thanks for the info I will have my guys look into it for sure. shouldn't be that difficult to fix

                                Comment

                                • Fletch XXX
                                  GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                                  • Jan 2002
                                  • 60840

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by RogerV
                                  LOL I go by the 10 second rule.. Thanks for the info I will have my guys look into it for sure. shouldn't be that difficult to fix
                                  well the 8 second rule is true, if you pyush it to 10 you are already hurting yourself.

                                  http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol5/load_time_no23.htm

                                  Slow-loading pages are the bane of the Web. In fact, surveys routinely cite slow pages as the #1 complaint about the Internet. A study by Zona Research found that 1/3 of visitors will leave a Web site that doesn't load within 8 seconds. With figures like that, load time should be a major design consideration for your pages.
                                  i take this very very serious.

                                  Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                                  Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                                  Comment

                                  • RogerV
                                    Banned!
                                    • Jul 2002
                                    • 12591

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Fletch XXX
                                    well the 8 second rule is true, if you pyush it to 10 you are already hurting yourself.

                                    http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol5/load_time_no23.htm



                                    i take this very very serious.
                                    I used to tell my designers 10 seconds or under before they had all these test out LOL

                                    this is why alot of the old school designs convert better than the new ones they load super fast

                                    thanks for the link I will forward it to my guys because I also take it very serious

                                    Comment

                                    • u-Bob
                                      there's no $$$ in porn
                                      • Jul 2005
                                      • 33063

                                      #19
                                      looks good. loads fine here (within 8 seconds)

                                      Comment

                                      • jayeff
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • May 2001
                                        • 2944

                                        #20
                                        I haven't checked your code properly, but a quick look made me wonder whether the load thingy may be because the page is a series of tables contained within a single table. If that is the case, the page likely doesn't load until all the tables are loaded. The way the background loaded before everything else popped up a few seconds later, suggested that too.

                                        If you don't want to (or cannot) do away with tables altogether, you could get around that by making the overall container a div. Things would improve further if you used table-layout:fixed (within a style sheet) for your main tables.

                                        None of these will actually reduce the total load time, but they will make the page begin to display quicker and create the illusion of better speed.

                                        Comment

                                        • GoLiaT
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Mar 2002
                                          • 1130

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by RogerV
                                          i can put up some hardlinks to you on
                                          http://www.interracialpornotgp.com
                                          and
                                          http://www.bigboobcollection.com

                                          if you do the same for me

                                          let me know
                                          webmaster at gorillalinks.com
                                          "where ever you go..there you are."

                                          Comment

                                          • slapass
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Nov 2002
                                            • 14625

                                            #22
                                            Ugly looking women. Pretty cool it is making sales.

                                            Comment

                                            • Basic_man
                                              Programming King Pin
                                              • Oct 2003
                                              • 27360

                                              #23
                                              Looks good.
                                              UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
                                              Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

                                              Comment

                                              • bdld
                                                $100,000
                                                • Dec 2001
                                                • 11452

                                                #24
                                                the design is alright, the thumbs though are not.

                                                Comment

                                                • RogerV
                                                  Banned!
                                                  • Jul 2002
                                                  • 12591

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by slapass
                                                  Ugly looking women. Pretty cool it is making sales.
                                                  I agree we added so many new gals for some reason the ugly ones are on top but they look like real girls that anyone can bang .. Plus its always changing and we are always adding new

                                                  Comment

                                                  • RogerV
                                                    Banned!
                                                    • Jul 2002
                                                    • 12591

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by GoLiaT
                                                    i can put up some hardlinks to you on
                                                    http://www.interracialpornotgp.com
                                                    and
                                                    http://www.bigboobcollection.com

                                                    if you do the same for me

                                                    let me know
                                                    webmaster at gorillalinks.com
                                                    Sounds good hit me up on ICQ tomorrow

                                                    Comment

                                                    • RogerV
                                                      Banned!
                                                      • Jul 2002
                                                      • 12591

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by jayeff
                                                      I haven't checked your code properly, but a quick look made me wonder whether the load thingy may be because the page is a series of tables contained within a single table. If that is the case, the page likely doesn't load until all the tables are loaded. The way the background loaded before everything else popped up a few seconds later, suggested that too.

                                                      If you don't want to (or cannot) do away with tables altogether, you could get around that by making the overall container a div. Things would improve further if you used table-layout:fixed (within a style sheet) for your main tables.

                                                      None of these will actually reduce the total load time, but they will make the page begin to display quicker and create the illusion of better speed.
                                                      Thanks for taking the time and giving advice

                                                      we will be improving it like everything else

                                                      Comment

                                                      • tranza
                                                        ICQ: 197-556-237
                                                        • Jun 2003
                                                        • 57559

                                                        #28
                                                        looks good roger
                                                        I'm just a newbie.

                                                        Comment

                                                        Working...