one of the true contenders for that title has just started. Saddam is already arguing with the judge. He is refusing to confirm his name...this is going to be 'fun'.
The phrase 'trial of the century' is overused but...
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
I agree the guy is obviously a madman so it's going to make for some good stories -
-
The judges need to remind him of his name and move onOriginally posted by sarah_webincone of the true contenders for that title has just started. Saddam is already arguing with the judge. He is refusing to confirm his name...this is going to be 'fun'.
But yea.. gonna be fun and little doubt many diversions opened up by the defense which could get "sensitive" in places.
Milosovich is kinda the same - they all appear to be in denial.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains
Adult News
KRL's Newsletter
Biz Tips
Just Listed DomainsComment
-
Originally posted by WebbyThe judges need to remind him of his name and move on
But yea.. gonna be fun and little doubt many diversions opened up by the defense which could get "sensitive" in places.
Milosovich is kinda the same - they all appear to be in denial.
I don't know if it was just the translator but I am sure I heard him say 'Mr. Saddam what is your name?'Comment
-
he had some seriously funny remarks like "this is falsh tribunal" etc..Originally posted by WebbyThe judges need to remind him of his name and move on
But yea.. gonna be fun and little doubt many diversions opened up by the defense which could get "sensitive" in places.
Milosovich is kinda the same - they all appear to be in denial.Daddy Strokes - mature men stroking their meat
Mature Gay Movies - mature men fucking everyone!
Pleasing Daddy - young girls fucking mature men
Looking for submitter accounts for older men niche content (both gay and straight) so hit me up if you run a tube and offer submitter accounts for paysites.Comment
-
hehehe thats great!Originally posted by KRL

tonyComment
-
Yea.. you're right - he did! Damn these formalities!Originally posted by sarah_webincI don't know if it was just the translator but I am sure I heard him say 'Mr. Saddam what is your name?'
Ya know... from the little so far, this looks like a shambles for court proceedings of this scale.
I don't mean the judges, but the apparent lack of facilities ranging from translators onwards. There is even an avoidance in showing faces of other judges, court staff or others present on the basis of them not living thru the trial.
It's understandable that Iraqi people may wish to have their say and the hearing talk place within Iraq, but sure screams out of something along the lines of the ICC.
The other factor is the incredible "guidance" given to this tribunal by the US - it's even US Marshall's doing court security - and judges who were "trained" by US legal "consultants".
Anyone know why broadcasts from the court are delayed 30 mins or so? Is this another amazing technical non-feat on the Iraqi side or are the tapes being monitored prior to broadcasting?
Overall, tho understandable to degrees, - it sure is no place near the level of an international criminal court in either quality/experience of judges or facilities.XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Originally posted by WebbyYea.. you're right - he did! Damn these formalities!
Ya know... from the little so far, this looks like a shambles for court proceedings of this scale.
I don't mean the judges, but the apparent lack of facilities ranging from translators onwards. There is even an avoidance in showing faces of other judges, court staff or others present on the basis of them not living thru the trial.
It's understandable that Iraqi people may wish to have their say and the hearing talk place within Iraq, but sure screams out of something along the lines of the ICC.
The other factor is the incredible "guidance" given to this tribunal by the US - it's even US Marshall's doing court security - and judges who were "trained" by US legal "consultants".
Anyone know why broadcasts from the court are delayed 30 mins or so? Is this another amazing technical non-feat on the Iraqi side or are the tapes being monitored prior to broadcasting?
Overall, tho understandable to degrees, - it sure is no place near the level of an international criminal court in either quality/experience of judges or facilities.
There was somebody on the BBC saying that the translators weren't translating it correctly. They were saying there were some things where Saddam said one thing and the translator said something slightly different but that changed the meaning.Comment

Comment