The phrase 'trial of the century' is overused but...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sarah_Jayne
    Now with more Jayne
    • Dec 2002
    • 40077

    #1

    The phrase 'trial of the century' is overused but...

    one of the true contenders for that title has just started. Saddam is already arguing with the judge. He is refusing to confirm his name...this is going to be 'fun'.
  • xclusive
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Apr 2004
    • 35218

    #2
    I agree the guy is obviously a madman so it's going to make for some good stories

    I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


    Comment

    • 8 Characters
      So Fucking Banned
      • Jan 2005
      • 2336

      #3
      Saddam in AMERICA

      Comment

      • Webby
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Oct 2002
        • 14956

        #4
        Originally posted by sarah_webinc
        one of the true contenders for that title has just started. Saddam is already arguing with the judge. He is refusing to confirm his name...this is going to be 'fun'.
        The judges need to remind him of his name and move on

        But yea.. gonna be fun and little doubt many diversions opened up by the defense which could get "sensitive" in places.

        Milosovich is kinda the same - they all appear to be in denial.
        XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

        Comment

        • KRL
          Entrepreneur
          • Oct 2002
          • 31429

          #5


          If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
          from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!

          *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
          Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains

          Comment

          • Sarah_Jayne
            Now with more Jayne
            • Dec 2002
            • 40077

            #6
            Originally posted by Webby
            The judges need to remind him of his name and move on

            But yea.. gonna be fun and little doubt many diversions opened up by the defense which could get "sensitive" in places.

            Milosovich is kinda the same - they all appear to be in denial.

            I don't know if it was just the translator but I am sure I heard him say 'Mr. Saddam what is your name?'

            Comment

            • Turf
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2001
              • 1865

              #7
              Originally posted by Webby
              The judges need to remind him of his name and move on

              But yea.. gonna be fun and little doubt many diversions opened up by the defense which could get "sensitive" in places.

              Milosovich is kinda the same - they all appear to be in denial.
              he had some seriously funny remarks like "this is falsh tribunal" etc..
              Daddy Strokes - mature men stroking their meat
              Mature Gay Movies - mature men fucking everyone!
              Pleasing Daddy - young girls fucking mature men

              Looking for submitter accounts for older men niche content (both gay and straight) so hit me up if you run a tube and offer submitter accounts for paysites.

              Comment

              • reynold
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Oct 2002
                • 51271

                #8
                Originally posted by sarah_webinc
                Saddam is already arguing with the judge. He is refusing to confirm his name...this is going to be 'fun'.
                now this is the trial of the century. a trial that will last a century.

                Comment

                • juve20
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 2542

                  #9
                  Originally posted by KRL


                  hehehe thats great!

                  tony
                  Monetize your site with AdBrite! Monetize your site with AdBrite!

                  Comment

                  • pietpiet
                    Registered User
                    • Oct 2005
                    • 6

                    #10
                    They should just shoot him.

                    Comment

                    • Antonio
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Oct 2001
                      • 14136

                      #11
                      Originally posted by pietpiet
                      They should just shoot him.
                      agreed, and Bush after him since Bush killed even more innocent people than Saddam

                      Comment

                      • GoBig
                        Registered User
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 43

                        #12
                        surprise! It's october!

                        Notice his attorney is trying to postpone it for 3 months.
                        UPDATEM - Automates members areas w/different members on different updates!

                        Comment

                        • Webby
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 14956

                          #13
                          Originally posted by sarah_webinc
                          I don't know if it was just the translator but I am sure I heard him say 'Mr. Saddam what is your name?'
                          Yea.. you're right - he did! Damn these formalities!

                          Ya know... from the little so far, this looks like a shambles for court proceedings of this scale.

                          I don't mean the judges, but the apparent lack of facilities ranging from translators onwards. There is even an avoidance in showing faces of other judges, court staff or others present on the basis of them not living thru the trial.

                          It's understandable that Iraqi people may wish to have their say and the hearing talk place within Iraq, but sure screams out of something along the lines of the ICC.

                          The other factor is the incredible "guidance" given to this tribunal by the US - it's even US Marshall's doing court security - and judges who were "trained" by US legal "consultants".

                          Anyone know why broadcasts from the court are delayed 30 mins or so? Is this another amazing technical non-feat on the Iraqi side or are the tapes being monitored prior to broadcasting?

                          Overall, tho understandable to degrees, - it sure is no place near the level of an international criminal court in either quality/experience of judges or facilities.
                          XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                          Comment

                          • Webby
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 14956

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Turf
                            he had some seriously funny remarks like "this is falsh tribunal" etc..
                            Ya could have taken the exact same words out of Milosovich's trial as well
                            XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.

                            Comment

                            • Sarah_Jayne
                              Now with more Jayne
                              • Dec 2002
                              • 40077

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Webby
                              Yea.. you're right - he did! Damn these formalities!

                              Ya know... from the little so far, this looks like a shambles for court proceedings of this scale.

                              I don't mean the judges, but the apparent lack of facilities ranging from translators onwards. There is even an avoidance in showing faces of other judges, court staff or others present on the basis of them not living thru the trial.

                              It's understandable that Iraqi people may wish to have their say and the hearing talk place within Iraq, but sure screams out of something along the lines of the ICC.

                              The other factor is the incredible "guidance" given to this tribunal by the US - it's even US Marshall's doing court security - and judges who were "trained" by US legal "consultants".

                              Anyone know why broadcasts from the court are delayed 30 mins or so? Is this another amazing technical non-feat on the Iraqi side or are the tapes being monitored prior to broadcasting?

                              Overall, tho understandable to degrees, - it sure is no place near the level of an international criminal court in either quality/experience of judges or facilities.

                              There was somebody on the BBC saying that the translators weren't translating it correctly. They were saying there were some things where Saddam said one thing and the translator said something slightly different but that changed the meaning.

                              Comment

                              Working...