Bush..
Steadfast and resolute with the fact that Saddam had WMD which he ultimatly didnt find however he did pose a threat.
I say fair enough to that, we all know Saddam was a fucktard.
Kerry..
Voted for the invasion of Iraq because he also beleived there were WMDs in the country, ultimatly it was discovered that there werent any however, he stil beleived Saddam posed a threat. However, upon gettin further intelligence about just how bad things are over there, he changed his mind.
Now here is the kicker..
As the President of the USA shouldnt you CHANGE YOUR MIND based upon current intelligence?
I thought being the President meant that if new information arises, you need to re-evaluate the actions you took based on the original bad information?
Why hasnt Kerry told Bush this? He [ Bush ] is still set on making Iraq a deocracy which we all know is a good thing but at what cost? To prove a point?
Bush needs to start doing some 'flip-flopping' of his own and realize he made a correct decision in sending our troops to Iraq based on the information he had when the war started however, simply ignoring the lastest information and beleiving he is still right IMHO is going to lose him the presidency.
The President, no matter who it is, needs to make and, if necessary, change his decisions based on the current climate anywhere.
Thats like any of us going to Best Buy to buy a new stereo system, finding one we like that costs $1000, going back home with some information about that system and subsequently finding out the same stere system can be purchased at Circuit City for only $500.
Instead of going to Circuit City to buy the new stereo tomorrow, we go back to Best Buy because at the time, we thought that was the best price.
Just my
on it all 
Regards,
Lee
Steadfast and resolute with the fact that Saddam had WMD which he ultimatly didnt find however he did pose a threat.
I say fair enough to that, we all know Saddam was a fucktard.
Kerry..
Voted for the invasion of Iraq because he also beleived there were WMDs in the country, ultimatly it was discovered that there werent any however, he stil beleived Saddam posed a threat. However, upon gettin further intelligence about just how bad things are over there, he changed his mind.
Now here is the kicker..
As the President of the USA shouldnt you CHANGE YOUR MIND based upon current intelligence?
I thought being the President meant that if new information arises, you need to re-evaluate the actions you took based on the original bad information?
Why hasnt Kerry told Bush this? He [ Bush ] is still set on making Iraq a deocracy which we all know is a good thing but at what cost? To prove a point?
Bush needs to start doing some 'flip-flopping' of his own and realize he made a correct decision in sending our troops to Iraq based on the information he had when the war started however, simply ignoring the lastest information and beleiving he is still right IMHO is going to lose him the presidency.
The President, no matter who it is, needs to make and, if necessary, change his decisions based on the current climate anywhere.
Thats like any of us going to Best Buy to buy a new stereo system, finding one we like that costs $1000, going back home with some information about that system and subsequently finding out the same stere system can be purchased at Circuit City for only $500.
Instead of going to Circuit City to buy the new stereo tomorrow, we go back to Best Buy because at the time, we thought that was the best price.
Just my
on it all Regards,
Lee
Comment