Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fetishblog
Reckless is defined as "marked by defiant disregard for danger or consequences"
Endangerment is defined as "hazard: a source of danger; a possibility of incurring loss or misfortune"
While the shotgun being discharged accidently was a source of danger and had the possibility of inccuring loss or misfortune, I hardly think that the person who did said act did it with a defiant disregard for the consequences. It's not like the person who did said act looked that carpet and said "DIE MOTHERFUCKER DIE" and pulled the trigger. 
BTW I love Max's content. Long live Max Hardcore. |
Sorry but if you give a gun to a highly trained law enforcement officer and he fires it unintentionally, then that is reckless. Reckless because he either ignored established procedure or he forgot/was unaware of it.
If he ignored it then I would say that definitely showed "defiant disregard for danger or consequences" on the officer's part
If he forgot/was unaware of it then I would say that definitely showed "defiant disregard for danger or consequences" on the part of whoever issued him with the gun.
However you look at it "reckless endangerment" seems a reasonable description to me.
