Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crockett
... a fucking Acacia blackmail letter .....
|
since snail mail spam is profitable for the US Post office, people could show their disapproval of receiving such junk by writing "return to sender" and having the USPS have to send it back..
if a large quantity of people did this, then the backfire could be that USPS then justifies a stamp increase, that while the spammers have to pay it, everyone else who sends mail would be caught up in it. on the flipside, they could raise the bulk rate to cover the additional costs if people did the "return to sender" thing.
Fight the unsolicited offline mail!