I started a Yahoo gorup for LA some time ago and the lelvel of members has reached a stupid amount in such a short time.
They have debated every fucking thing including that LA is in fact 3 models !!!!!
do you think this is useful info for the guy at Tripple X
This post was just made;
That's good to know. Perhaps they will get this, then.
First, April is hot. There is no rational reason to be a part of this group if one does not think so.
However, in looking at her promo videos, there are some obvious flaws. In one, there is far too much
footage of her in non-sexual activities. Seriously, footage of April in an arcade will not induce anyone to
pay for her site. In another, the demo with her getting it on with another girl, there are too many jump cuts.
This greatly decreases the ambience of the footage. Also, the production value is quite low. In several
shots, one can see a sound guy's foot, or example. Another member of the list pointed out that, in the
entire video, we do not see April going down on the other girl (and we know she is quite willing to go down
on girls because there are pics of her doing just that), so the video does a better job of promoting
how hot the other girl is, and I don't even know who she is. (If anyone can point me to her other work,
muchos gracias.)
Also, regarding her lesbianism, to me that is an excellent selling point. I would not pay for any
site that did not offer ample lesbian material. However, in looking at her site's updates, it would seem she
has not added any lesbian content in months, hence my non-subscriber status. Also, if the photographer
thought that girls leaving their pink caps on while making out with each other would add anything to
the pics, he was mistaken. And, like many porn photographers, he does not know when to take a shot
from close up or when to take it from a distance and use a zoom lens to achieve the close-up. This
is why so many porn shots that have a girl's foot closer to the camera than her face, for example, lead to
her foot being disproportionately large in the photograph.
There's one thing about her braces that maked me uncomfortable, too. Yes, she's over 18,
but at first view they made it seem like she was aiming for the pedophile crowd, and
I'd rather not be associated with that demographic. If the braces are a touch to make her seem
younger, well, my first impression was that they made her seem a little *too* young, and
it took me a while to be at ease in looking at them.
I hope it will be recognized that this is not just a bunch of complaining, but rather, as my subject header
connotes, it is intended as constructive criticism.
They have debated every fucking thing including that LA is in fact 3 models !!!!!
do you think this is useful info for the guy at Tripple X
This post was just made;
That's good to know. Perhaps they will get this, then.
First, April is hot. There is no rational reason to be a part of this group if one does not think so.
However, in looking at her promo videos, there are some obvious flaws. In one, there is far too much
footage of her in non-sexual activities. Seriously, footage of April in an arcade will not induce anyone to
pay for her site. In another, the demo with her getting it on with another girl, there are too many jump cuts.
This greatly decreases the ambience of the footage. Also, the production value is quite low. In several
shots, one can see a sound guy's foot, or example. Another member of the list pointed out that, in the
entire video, we do not see April going down on the other girl (and we know she is quite willing to go down
on girls because there are pics of her doing just that), so the video does a better job of promoting
how hot the other girl is, and I don't even know who she is. (If anyone can point me to her other work,
muchos gracias.)
Also, regarding her lesbianism, to me that is an excellent selling point. I would not pay for any
site that did not offer ample lesbian material. However, in looking at her site's updates, it would seem she
has not added any lesbian content in months, hence my non-subscriber status. Also, if the photographer
thought that girls leaving their pink caps on while making out with each other would add anything to
the pics, he was mistaken. And, like many porn photographers, he does not know when to take a shot
from close up or when to take it from a distance and use a zoom lens to achieve the close-up. This
is why so many porn shots that have a girl's foot closer to the camera than her face, for example, lead to
her foot being disproportionately large in the photograph.
There's one thing about her braces that maked me uncomfortable, too. Yes, she's over 18,
but at first view they made it seem like she was aiming for the pedophile crowd, and
I'd rather not be associated with that demographic. If the braces are a touch to make her seem
younger, well, my first impression was that they made her seem a little *too* young, and
it took me a while to be at ease in looking at them.
I hope it will be recognized that this is not just a bunch of complaining, but rather, as my subject header
connotes, it is intended as constructive criticism.
Comment