Monolith vs Nats

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • D-Money
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Feb 2002
    • 9716

    #51
    50 NATS rule
    Still Ballin'

    Comment

    • TheDoc
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jul 2001
      • 13827

      #52
      We use proudly use NATS!

      http://www.evilgeniuscash.com
      ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
      It's all disambiguation

      Comment

      • Lange
        Confirmed User
        • Apr 2002
        • 472

        #53
        Originally posted by PBucksJohn
        I don't think it's safe to say that. Find me someone who has had a bad experience with us. Please don't go posting that people have had bad experiences with us when you don't know a single person who has Thank you.
        I think you took this the wrong way there pal...

        relax

        Comment

        • aiken
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2003
          • 204

          #54
          Originally posted by Lensman
          Yeah, I bought their stuff. That's all I'll say.
          We paid for Monolith and abandoned it after they went unresponsive for weeks during the install process.

          I couldn't be happier with NATS.

          Cheers
          -b
          ICQ: 12005327

          Comment

          • bigdog
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2001
            • 6964

            #55
            Originally posted by Pornkings
            We use River Styx on our smaller projects and programs

            Pornkings is all built in-house and proprietary


            River styx kicks ass
            last i checked there was a shaving feature in that script

            Comment

            • TMM_John
              Confirmed User
              • May 2004
              • 6665

              #56
              Originally posted by Lange
              I think you took this the wrong way there pal...

              relax
              I'm relaxed. I just don't appreciate people saying there are parties who have had bad experiences with my company when in fact there aren't any. I'm sure you can understand that.


              Too Much Media - Makers of the Industry's Leading Payite Management Platform, NATS!

              Comment

              • Manowar
                jellyfish  
                • Dec 2003
                • 71528

                #57
                Originally posted by Trax
                For various reasons: NATS all the way!

                Comment

                • fletcher
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 698

                  #58
                  Originally posted by aiken
                  We paid for Monolith and abandoned it after they went unresponsive for weeks during the install process.

                  I couldn't be happier with NATS.

                  Cheers
                  -b
                  I figured I'd chime in on this one. This was back in the spring and the setup was on Windows machines, using Microsoft SQL server. I notified the company from the beginning we'd never set it up on Windows before, or even tested it. It was designed for UNIX and MySQL. All that was ever paid was a $495 setup fee. I was on the phone everyday for weeks with you as well as your techs, so don't say we were unresponsive.

                  I was even on your machines through VPN trying to set it up with you guys. It was known Windows was unsupported from the beginning. If you still have any issues, feel free to contact me.

                  I've heard good things about NAT and I'm sure they have a great product. It's up to the person using the software to test both out and pick what fits your company best. If anyone wants to try out Monolith, feel free to talk to me and I'll get you a demo and even a live demo on your servers for no cost so you can see what it's like.

                  -Fletcher
                   
                  [email protected]
                  ICQ: 6411138

                  Comment

                  • MichaelP
                    Registered User
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 7123

                    #59
                    A bump for John (NATS)

                    Comment

                    Working...